Skip to main content
Parliament of Canada
Visit Parliament
Visit
Français
FR
Menu
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Career opportunities
Current Opportunities
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Youth Opportunities
Canada's Top Employers for Young People
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working at the House
Who we are and what we Offer
Canada's Capital Region
City of Ottawa
City of Gatineau
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Share this page
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Historical information
This a previous edition. For the latest publication, consult
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
, Third Edition, 2017
.
Table of Contents
Home Page
Introductory Pages
Parliamentary Institutions
Parliaments and Ministries
Privileges and Immunities
The House of Commons and Its Members
Parliamentary Procedure
The Physical and Administrative Setting
The Speaker and Other Presiding Officers of the House
The Parliamentary Cycle
Sittings of the House
The Daily Program
Questions
The Process of Debate
Rules of Order and Decorum
The Curtailment of Debate
Introduction
The Previous Question
Closure
Time Allocation
“Routine Motion” by a Minister
Suspension of Standing Orders for Matter of Urgent Nature
Notes 1-50
Notes 51-100
Notes 101-150
Notes 151-156
Special Debates
The Legislative Process
Delegated Legislation
Financial Procedures
Committees of the Whole House
Committees
Private Members’ Business
Public Petitions
Private Bills Practice
The Parliamentary Record
Appendices
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
Edited by Robert Marleau and Camille Montpetit
2000 Edition
—
More information …
14. The Curtailment of Debate
Print this section
|
Open/print full chapter
[51]
See, for example,
Debates
, April 6, 1981, p. 9014.
[52]
See, for example,
Journals
, August 29, 1917, p. 605; in December 1988, notice of closure was given on the first day of debate at second reading, Committee of the Whole and third reading stages of Bill C-2,
Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
(
Journals
, December 15, 1988, pp. 36-7; December 20, 1988, p. 61;
Debates
, December 20, 1988, p. 500;
Journals
, December 22, 1988, pp. 72-3).
[53]
On March 1, 1926, after some 25 days of debate, the government gave notice of closure on the motion for the Address in Reply; the motion was moved and adopted on March 2 (
Journals
, pp. 121, 123).
[54]
See Speaker Fraser’s ruling,
Debates
, December 15, 1988, p. 78.
[55]
In 1969, three notices of closure were given in respect to a motion for concurrence in the report of a procedure committee (
Journals
, July 22, 1969, pp. 1383; July 23, 1969, p. 1386; July 24, 1969, p. 1393). The closure motion was moved on July 24, 1969 (
Journals
, p. 1396). In 1987, two notices of closure were given on a motion concerning capital punishment (
Journals
, June 18, 1987, p. 1200; June 26, 1987, p. 1263). The closure motion was moved during the following sitting (
Journals
, June 29, 1987, p. 1274).
[56]
Journals
, December 4, 1986, pp. 272, 274; August 26, 1987, p. 1384; August 28, 1987, pp. 1396-7.
[57]
Debates
, June 16, 1989, pp. 3146-8.
[58]
See Speaker Fraser’s ruling,
Debates
, December 15, 1988, pp. 76-8.
[59]
Following a question of privilege protesting the government’s intent to invoke closure on the motion relating to the reinstatement of capital punishment, Speaker Fraser ruled that the timing of closure in a debate is not a procedural matter and that the Chair has no discretionary power to refuse the motion and is without authority to intervene when a Standing Order is used according to the House’s rules and practices (
Debates
, June 29, 1987, pp. 7713-4). See also,
Journals
, July 24, 1969, pp. 1397-9;
Debates
, February 7, 1990, pp. 7953-4.
[60]
Standing Order 57.
[61]
Journals
, December 14, 1964, p. 1000.
[62]
Debates
, April 13, 1921, p. 2094; October 23, 1980, pp. 4049-53.
[63]
In 1969, Speaker Lamoureux delivered a ruling in which he reviewed the precedents and concluded that if the debate as a whole is to be closured, then any amendment or other motion applying to the main motion is included in the termination time set out in the closure rule (
Journals
, July 24, 1969, pp. 1393-6).
[64]
Standing Order 45(3).
[65]
On occasion, debate on a closured item has collapsed prior to the cut-off time. See, for example,
Journals
, June 26, 1989, pp. 450-3; March 4, 1996, pp. 33-5, 39-42; and
Debates
, March 4, 1996, pp. 270-3.
[66]
See
Journals
, December 6, 1995, pp. 2214-6; March 14, 1996, pp. 94-6.
[67]
Standing Order 45(7).
[68]
See, for example,
Debates
, April 1, 1932, p. 1609; May 31, 1956, pp. 4516-7; December 21, 1988, pp. 539-41.
[69]
Debates
, May 24, 1956, pp. 4286-93.
[70]
Debates
, April 28, 1919, p. 1796.
[71]
Debates
, May 15, 1956, pp. 3968-72.
[72]
Standing Order 78.
[73]
See, for example,
Journals
, November 28, 1996, p. 930.
[74]
Since time allocation can be used to curtail debate, it is commonly referred to as “closure” in debate.
[75]
Between May 15 and June 5, 1956, closure was used at all four stages of the legislative process as it was then: resolution (
Debates
, May 15, 1956, p. 3895); second reading (
Debates
, May 22, 1956, p. 4165); Committee of the Whole (
Debates
, May 31, 1956, p. 4498); and third reading (
Debates
, June 5, 1956, p. 4689).
[76]
As comments from that period suggest, Members were eager to see the time of the House used more efficiently. See, for example,
Debates
, May 9, 1960, pp. 3685, 3692; January 18, 1961, p. 1169; March 26, 1962, pp. 2162-6.
[77]
See comments by Finance Minister Donald Fleming (
Debates
, May 9, 1960, pp. 3685, 3687); by Opposition Leader Lester B. Pearson and CCF Leader Hazen Argue (
Debates
, January 18, 1961, pp. 1169-70); by Opposition Leader John G. Diefenbaker (
Debates
, October 23, 1963, pp. 3925-31) and by Stanley Knowles (Winnipeg North Centre) (
Debates
, May 20, 1965, pp. 1530-1).
[78]
Motions to appoint the special committees were adopted on May 9, 1960 (
Journals
, p. 434); January 18, 1961 (
Journals
, p. 163); March 26, 1962 (
Journals
, p. 277); October 23, 1963 (
Journals
, p. 482); March 9, 1964 (
Journals
, pp. 76-7); January 25, 1967 (
Journals
, pp. 1227-8); May 8, 1967 (
Journals
, p. 12).
[79]
Journals
, August 19, 1964, p. 633.
[80]
Journals
, May 19, 1965, pp. 128-9.
[81]
See
Journals
for May 19, 20, 21, 25, 26 and 27, and June 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 and 8, 1965.
[82]
Journals
, June 8, 1965, pp. 210-1.
[83]
Journals
, June 11, 1965, pp. 219-23.
[84]
Speaker Lamoureux noted that the provisional Standing Order “not only dispenses with the requirement for 48 hours’ notice with respect to a motion for time allocation; it also renders inoperative the ordinary machinery for putting a notice on the order paper” (
Debates
, April 20, 1967, pp. 15120-1).
[85]
Journals
, September 20, 1968, p. 58.
[86]
Journals
, September 24, 1968, p. 68
[87]
Journals
, December 6, 1968, pp. 439-40.
[88]
Journals
, December 20, 1968, p. 579.
[89]
The Third Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and Organization was presented on June 20, 1969 (
Journals
, pp. 1211-2), and adopted on July 24, 1969 (
Journals
, pp. 1393-402), after debate which continued over 12 sitting days and was brought to an end with the aid of closure.
[90]
On December 1, 1971, points of order were raised regarding the wording and interpretation of Standing Order 78(3). Speaker Lamoureux ruled that 48 hours’ written notice was not required to move a time allocation motion and, furthermore, that it was regular to move such a motion for the disposal of proceedings for the stage being considered by the House (
Journals
, pp. 947-8).
[91]
In 1971, Speaker Lamoureux ruled that, in essence, independent Members would not receive the recognition accorded to Members represented by a party spokesperson, according to the wording of Standing Order 78(1) (
Journals
, December 30, 1971, pp. 1013-4).
[92]
Debates
, November 13, 1975, p. 9022.
[93]
Standing Committee on Procedure and Organization,
Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence
, September 30, 1976, Issue No. 20, pp. 59-63.
[94]
Debates
, December 20, 1978, pp. 2317-20.
[95]
See pages 20 and 21 of “Position Paper: The Reform of Parliament”, tabled on November 23, 1979 (
Journals
, p. 260).
[96]
Debates
, March 7, 1983, pp. 23510-1.
[97]
Debates
, October 26, 1983, pp. 28357-8.
[98]
Debates
, May 16, 1985, pp. 4821-2.
[99]
Journals
, June 3, 1987, pp. 1026-7.
[100]
Debates
, August 15, 1988, pp. 18309-11; August 16, 1988, pp. 18352-5, 18380-1.