Skip to main content
Parliament of Canada
Visit Parliament
Visit
Français
FR
Menu
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Career opportunities
Current Opportunities
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Youth Opportunities
Canada's Top Employers for Young People
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working at the House
Who we are and what we Offer
Canada's Capital Region
City of Ottawa
City of Gatineau
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Share this page
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Historical information
This a previous edition. For the latest publication, consult
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
, Third Edition, 2017
.
Table of Contents
Home Page
Introductory Pages
Parliamentary Institutions
Parliaments and Ministries
Privileges and Immunities
The House of Commons and Its Members
Parliamentary Procedure
The Physical and Administrative Setting
The Speaker and Other Presiding Officers of the House
The Parliamentary Cycle
Sittings of the House
The Daily Program
Questions
The Process of Debate
Rules of Order and Decorum
The Curtailment of Debate
Introduction
The Previous Question
Closure
Time Allocation
“Routine Motion” by a Minister
Suspension of Standing Orders for Matter of Urgent Nature
Notes 1-50
Notes 51-100
Notes 101-150
Notes 151-156
Special Debates
The Legislative Process
Delegated Legislation
Financial Procedures
Committees of the Whole House
Committees
Private Members’ Business
Public Petitions
Private Bills Practice
The Parliamentary Record
Appendices
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
Edited by Robert Marleau and Camille Montpetit
2000 Edition
—
More information …
14. The Curtailment of Debate
Print this section
|
Open/print full chapter
[101]
Journals
, April 11, 1991, pp. 2915-6.
[102]
For a procedural definition of a recognized party, see
Chapter 1, “Parliamentary Institutions”
. See also
Journals
, December 30, 1971, pp. 1013-4;
Debates
, April 2, 1993, p. 18052.
[103]
Standing Order 78(1).
[104]
See, for example,
Debates
, July 22, 1977, p. 7916.
[105]
There are times when, rather than resorting to the written rule, party representatives agree on an allocation of time, which the House then adopts by unanimous consent. See, for example
Journals
, October 26, 1978, pp. 69-70 (timetable for the consideration of a bill, including number of committee meetings, instruction to amend, and committee reporting deadline); March 10, 1987, p. 568 (agreement to complete consideration of two bills at all stages); March 20, 1992, p. 1192 (agreement to consider all stages of a bill).
[106]
Standing Order 78(2).
[107]
Debates
, August 16, 1988, pp. 18380-1. On this occasion, the two parties in opposition contended that an agreement had been reached pursuant to the rule, to which the government was not a party; however, the Chair ruled that the initiative of announcing any agreement or lack thereof is clearly with the government (i.e., a Minister), who must be party to any agreement and whose support is signified by his or her rising under the terms of the Standing Order.
[108]
Standing Order 76.1(10).
[109]
Standing Order 78(2)(
a
). See, for example,
Journals
, June 21, 1994, pp. 633-7, when no less than four motions were moved and adopted to allocate time in respect to four bills.
[110]
Standing Order 78(2)(
b
).
[111]
Standing Order 78(3).
[112]
See, for example,
Debates
, December 1, 1971, pp. 10050-1.
[113]
Standing Order 76.1(10).
[114]
Written notice of a motion for the allocation of time is acceptable when given in addition to oral notice (see Speaker Bosley’s ruling,
Debates
, May 16, 1985, pp. 4821-2).
[115]
See, for example,
Debates
, April 2, 1990, pp. 10102-3; April 3, 1990, p. 10124.
[116]
Standing Order 78(3). The Speaker has ruled that oral notice of an intention to move a motion for time allocation is not covered by the rule pertaining to notice (Standing Order 54(1)) and that 48 hours’ written notice is therefore not required (
Journals
, December 1, 1971, p. 948).
[117]
See, for example,
Debates
, March 7, 1983, p. 23511; October 19, 1983, pp. 28127-9; June 3, 1988, pp. 16127-8.
[118]
Standing Order 78(3). See, for example,
Debates
, December 1, 1982, p. 21172;
Journals
, December 1, 1982, p. 5408.
[119]
See Speaker Fraser’s ruling,
Debates
, August 16, 1988, pp. 18380-1.
[120]
In this case, 0.1 hour was allocated to the report stage and 0.25 hour to third reading (all-party agreement) (
Journals
, April 2, 1993, pp. 2791-2).
[121]
Standing Order 78.
[122]
Standing Order 78(2)(
a
), (3)(
a
).
[123]
Standing Order 78(3)(
b
).
[124]
For example, consideration of Bill C-85 (
Canagrex Act
) was resumed several months after a time allocation motion for both report stage and third reading had been adopted by the House (
Journals
, December 13, 1982, p. 5458 (notice of time allocation given); December 16, 1982, pp. 5470-1 (time allocation motion adopted); June 7, 1983, pp. 5972-87 (report stage); June 13, 1983, pp. 6000-2 (third reading)).
[125]
Standing Order 45(3).
[126]
In 1987, for example, the question on the motion for third reading of a bill, under an order for time allocation adopted on June 15 (
Journals
, pp. 1094-5), was put on June 17 and deferred to June 18, pursuant to a special order adopted on June 16 (
Journals
, p. 1175).
[127]
Standing Order 45(6)(
a
). See, for example,
Journals
, November 27, 1992, p. 2252; December 1, 1995, p. 2199; March 12, 1999, p. 1601.
[128]
Standing Order 45(7).
[129]
Standing Order 45(5). See, for example,
Journals
, November 29, 1996, p. 939.
[130]
Debates
, April 4, 1990, pp. 10183-5; December 9, 1992, pp. 14917-23; March 31, 1993, pp. 17854-62.
[131]
Debates
, June 6, 1988, pp. 16139, 16142-9; August 16, 1988, pp. 18380-1; March 29, 1990, pp. 9916-7; October 1, 1990, p. 13622.
[132]
Standing Order 56.1.
[133]
Standing Order 56.1(1)(
b
).
[134]
See, for example,
Journals
, March 22, 1999, p. 1645.
[135]
See, for example,
Journals
, March 16, 1995, p. 1226; April 24, 1997, pp. 1524-5.
[136]
See, for example,
Journals
, March 23, 1995, p. 1265.
[137]
See, for example,
Journals
, June 15, 1995, p. 1754.
[138]
See, for example,
Journals
,April 12, 1999, p. 1687.
[139]
See, for example,
Journals
,December 1, 1997, pp. 290-1.
[140]
See, for example,
Journals
,April 12, 1999, p. 1687.
[141]
See, for example,
Journals
,June 9, 1998, p. 954.
[142]
Journals
, April 11, 1991, p. 2913.
[143]
Practically unused during the Thirty-Fifth Parliament, Standing Order 56.1 was moved six times between September 1997 and June 1999. It could be argued that, because of the 25-Member provision, Standing Order 56.1 is particularly attractive when there are many officially recognized opposition parties.
[144]
See, for example,
Debates
, March 26, 1991, p. 19044.
[145]
Debates
, April 9, 1991, pp. 19233-7, especially p. 19236.
[146]
Standing Order 53.
[147]
In 1992, Standing Order 53(1) was used to waive the 48-hour notice requirement for the beginning of the report stage of a government bill (
Journals
, June 1, 1992, pp. 1560-1).
[148]
In 1992, Deputy Speaker Champagne ruled the motion out of order because, contrary to the terms of Standing Order 53(2), the Minister had not stated the reasons for the urgency of the motion when he presented it to the House. See
Debates
, December 11, 1992, pp. 15132-3.
[149]
See, for example,
Debates
, June 10, 1999, pp. 16227-30.
[150]
See, for example,
Journals
, March 15, 1995, p. 1219.