Skip to main content
Parliament of Canada
Visit Parliament
Visit
Français
FR
Menu
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Career opportunities
Current Opportunities
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Youth Opportunities
Canada's Top Employers for Young People
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working at the House
Who we are and what we Offer
Canada's Capital Region
City of Ottawa
City of Gatineau
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Share this page
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Historical information
This a previous edition. For the latest publication, consult
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
, Third Edition, 2017
.
Table of Contents
Home Page
Introductory Pages
Parliamentary Institutions
Parliaments and Ministries
Privileges and Immunities
The House of Commons and Its Members
Parliamentary Procedure
The Physical and Administrative Setting
The Speaker and Other Presiding Officers of the House
The Parliamentary Cycle
Sittings of the House
The Daily Program
Questions
The Process of Debate
Rules of Order and Decorum
The Curtailment of Debate
Special Debates
The Legislative Process
Delegated Legislation
Financial Procedures
Introduction
The Business of Supply
Borrowing Authority
Governor General’s Special Warrants
The Business of Ways and Means
The Accounts of Canada
Notes 1-50
Notes 51-100
Notes 101-150
Notes 151-200
Notes 201-250
Notes 251-300
Notes 301-350
Notes 351-400
Notes 401-434
Committees of the Whole House
Committees
Private Members’ Business
Public Petitions
Private Bills Practice
The Parliamentary Record
Appendices
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
Edited by Robert Marleau and Camille Montpetit
2000 Edition
—
More information …
18. Financial Procedures
Print this section
|
Open/print full chapter
[351]
Standing Order 40(2).
[352]
Standing Order 81(11). This has never occurred.
[353]
Prior to 1955, only one Budget debate did not terminate with a decision by the House. The Twentieth Parliament dissolved on April 30, 1949, without votes being held on the sub-amendment, amendment or main motion.
[354]
Journals
, April 10, 1962, p. 344.
[355]
Journals
, April 21, 1966, p. 428; June 5, 1969, p. 1121.
[356]
On May 8, 1974, following the sub-amendment being agreed to (
Journals
, pp. 175-6), Prime Minister Trudeau sought a dissolution; the Twenty-Ninth Parliament was dissolved the next day. On December 13, 1979, following the sub-amendment being agreed to (
Journals
, pp. 345-6), Prime Minister Clark sought a dissolution; the Thirty-First Parliament was dissolved the next day.
[357]
Journals
, February 28, 1991, pp. 2639-40; March 4, 1991, pp. 2653-4.
[358]
Journals
, April 28, 1993, pp. 2874-5.
[359]
Journals
, July 12, 1955, p. 926.
[360]
Standing Order 84(3).
[361]
Standing Order 84(7). See also
Debates
, February 20, 1990, pp. 8578-9.
[362]
Standing Order 85.
[363]
See, for example, the debates on the Budgets presented on June 13, 1963, and March 29, 1966.
[364]
Amendments to the Budget motion are rarely disallowed, the most recent example occurring in 1978 when a sub-amendment “modif[ied] the first proposition completely” (see
Debates
, November 17, 1978, p. 1250). Other amendments deemed inadmissible include those dealing with matters before the House or already decided upon by the House (see, for example,
Journals
, May 15, 1934, pp. 332-3; July 1, 1942, pp. 454-6) or one of its committees (see, for example,
Journals
, May 7, 1934, pp. 311-2) and those which are not relevant to the question on which the amendment is proposed (see, for example,
Journals
, March 8, 1937, p. 208).
[365]
Standing Order 84(4).
[366]
Standing Order 84(5).
[367]
Standing Order 84(6).
[368]
See
Journals
, April 23, 1970, p. 711; November 27, 1974, p. 150; July 4, 1975, p. 685; June 10, 1976, p. 1341; April 20, 1978, p. 668; November 24, 1978, p. 184.
[369]
Journals
, March 7, 1986, p. 1777.
[370]
Journals
, May 15, 1930, p. 318; April 11, 1933, p. 401; May 27, 1948, p. 485; March 31, 1949, p. 290 (Parliament was dissolved before the amendment came to a vote); December 21, 1960, p. 138; June 22, 1961, pp. 707-8; May 7, 1974, p. 169; April 19, 1977, p. 680; June 29, 1982, p. 5101; February 16, 1984, p. 180.
[371]
Journals
, May 8, 1974, pp. 175-6; December 13, 1979, pp. 345-6.
[372]
May
, 22
nd
ed., pp. 777-82. See also rulings of Speaker Parent,
Debates
, February 12, 1998, p. 3765, and December 2, 1998, pp. 10789-91.
[373]
See ruling of Speaker Michener,
Journals
, December 9, 1957, p. 254; ruling of Speaker Lamoureux,
Journals
, March 27, 1972, p. 223. See also
May
, 22
nd
ed., p. 781.
[374]
Standing Order 83(1). See, for example,
Debates
, January 30, 1985, p. 1832. While the Standing Orders explicitly permit the tabling of notices of Ways and Means motions at any time during a sitting regardless of the business then before the House, the Speaker has clearly indicated that such tabling is more appropriate during certain proceedings than others. For instance, it would not be appropriate during Question Period or when another Member is speaking unless the House was about to adjourn. (See ruling of Speaker Bosley,
Debates
, September 11, 1985, p. 6498.) Prior to 1968, the practice was for notices of Ways and Means motions to be given only during the Budget speech. It is now procedurally acceptable for a Minister to introduce Ways and Means legislation based on Budget proposals presented in a previous session. (See ruling of Speaker Lamoureux,
Journals
, March 20, 1972, p. 202, and
Debates
, March 20, 1972, pp. 963-5.)
[375]
Standing Order 83(2). See, for example, October 7, 1997 (
Debates
, p. 569, and
Journals
, p. 83), and December 2, 1998 (
Debates
, p. 10791, and
Journals
, p. 1357).
[376]
Standing Order 83(1). This restriction has been circumvented with the consent of the House. (See, for example,
Debates
, January 19, 1987, pp. 2368-70).
[377]
Standing Order 83(3).
[378]
See, for example,
Journals
, October 22, 1997, p. 136.
[379]
Standing Order 83(4). (See, for example,
Journals
, April 8, 1997, pp. 1354-5, and April 9, 1997, pp. 1362-3.) On occasion, two or more Ways and Means motions were adopted and a single bill was introduced. (See, for example,
Journals
, February 16, 1971, p. 334, and April 3, 1973, p. 237.)
[380]
See, for example,
Journals
, December 11, 1996, p. 992 (Sessional Paper 8570-352-14).
[381]
See, for example,
Journals
, October 23, 1996, p. 763 (Sessional Paper 8570-352-8).
[382]
May
, 22
nd
ed., p. 794.
[383]
See, for example, rulings of Speaker Jerome,
Journals
, July 15, 1975, p. 710; May 19, 1978, p. 786;
Debates
, June 7, 1978, p. 6155.
[384]
Speaker Jerome,
Journals
, December 18, 1974, p. 224. See also
Journals
, July 14, 1975, p. 707; May 19, 1978, p. 784.
[385]
See ruling of Speaker Jerome,
Debates
, June 7, 1978, p. 6155.
[386]
See ruling of Speaker Jerome,
Journals
, May 19, 1978, p. 786.
[387]
See ruling of Speaker Lamoureux,
Journals
, December 13, 1973, pp. 746-7; ruling of Speaker Fraser,
Debates
, January 29, 1990, pp. 7546-9.
[388]
Standing Order 83(4). This allows for debate on Ways and Means bills to begin one sitting day earlier than the debate on other government bills.
[389]
See, for example, rulings of Speaker Jerome,
Journals
, December 18, 1974, pp. 224-5; July 14, 1975, pp. 706-7; May 19, 1978, pp. 784-6.
[390]
On one occasion, a Ways and Means bill was introduced and read the first time without prior concurrence in the Ways and Means motion, and the proceedings on the bill were declared null and void. (See ruling of Speaker Fraser,
Debates
, October 9, 1986, p. 246.)
[391]
See
Chapter 16, “The Legislative Process”
.
[392]
Speaker Parent ruled that a Senate bill imposed a tax and thus should have been preceded by a Ways and Means motion. The bill was deemed to be improperly presented before the House and the first reading proceedings were declared null and void. ( See
Debates
, December 2, 1998, p. 10791, and
Journals
, December 2, 1998, p. 1360.)
[393]
See
Chapter 16, “The Legislative Process”
.
[394]
See, for example,
Debates
, December 19, 1984, p. 1380; Standing Committee on Consumer and Corporate Affairs and Government Operations,
Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence
, December 3, 1991, Issue No. 29, pp. 16-35, and in particular pp. 30-1. On occasion, with the unanimous consent of the House, a new Ways and Means motion has been concurred in, and a Minister of the Crown has proposed amendments to bills which went beyond the provisions of the original Ways and Means motion. Consent to move these amendments was usually requested either in a Committee of the Whole or during report stage. (For examples of where the House has proceeded by way of unanimous consent in a Committee of the Whole, see
Debates
, April 9, 1973, p. 3121, and January 7, 1974, p. 9115. For an example of where the House has proceeded by unanimous consent at report stage, see
Debates
, May 26, 1981, pp. 9931-2, 9948.)
[395]
See, for example,
Journals
, November 5, 1976, p. 114; October 20, 1978, p. 42; April 9, 1997, pp. 1362-3.
[396]
See ruling of Speaker Fraser,
Debates
, June 8, 1988, pp. 16254-5. Despite the fact that two different procedures are invoked, such bills are acceptable providing the notice provision is respected (see rulings of Speaker Sauvé,
Debates
, January 19, 1981, p. 6319, and February 16, 1982, p. 15053; ruling of Speaker Francis,
Debates
, January 18, 1984, p. 526).
[397]
See ruling of Speaker Francis,
Debates
, January 18, 1984, p. 526.
[398]
As early as 1341, Edward III had conceded the principle that grants to the Crown should be audited to ensure they were spent for the purposes intended (
Dreidger
, p. 30).
[399]
Standing Order 108(3)(
e
). See also the Final Report of the Royal Commission on Financial Management and Accountability (Lambert Commission), March 1979 (Supply and Services Canada), and especially Part V, “Accountability to Parliament: Closing the Loop”, pp. 367-419.
[400]
The Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada also serves as Receiver General for Canada (
Department of Public Works and Government Services Act
, S.C. 1996, c. 16, s. 3(3)).