Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.
Honourable members of the committee, welcome to the first meeting of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs.
I see a quorum.
Pursuant to Standing Order 106(3)(a), as the clerk of the committee, I will preside over the elections of the chair and the vice-chairs.
I must inform members that the clerk of the committee can only receive motions for the election of the chair. The clerk cannot receive other types of motions, entertain points of order or participate in debate.
[Translation]
We can now proceed to the election of the chair.
Pursuant to Standing Order 106(2), the chair must be a member of the government party.
I would like to congratulate our two vice‑chairs and all the members of this committee, which plays a key role in the lives of a number of people. These people served our country, and they often come to share their stories and ask us to help them with some of the issues that they face.
[English]
Welcome to meeting number one of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs.
[Translation]
Before we begin, I would ask all in‑person participants to read the guidelines written on the updated cards on the table. These measures are in place to help prevent audio and feedback incidents, and to protect the health and safety of all participants, including the interpreters, whom I would like to thank.
You'll also notice a QR code on the card that links to a short awareness video.
[English]
I invite all of you to be very attentive to ensure the well-being of our interpreters.
[Translation]
Thank you in advance.
Today's meeting is taking place in a hybrid format.
[English]
I would like to remind participants of the following points.
[Translation]
Before speaking, please wait until I recognize you by name. Committee members, please raise your hand if you wish to speak. I'll do my best to stay on top of things.
[English]
To help me see—certainly, our clerk will help me—if you have comments that you would like to bring forward, please raise your hand.
[Translation]
The committee clerk and I will take care to keep track of the speaking order.
[English]
As a reminder, all comments should be addressed through the chair.
I hope you all had the chance to look at our routine motions. With the agreement of the committee, we can proceed to the consideration of the routine motions.
[Translation]
I know that the committee clerk has circulated a list of draft routine motions that were prepared by all the whips of the recognized parties.
As a reminder, a motion must be moved by a committee member. It's also easier to consider the routine motions one by one.
[English]
We'll do that if it's okay, and I have agreement.
The first one, I think, is very important. I'll invite a member to read the motion.
The first motion is about analyst services. I move:
That the committee retain, as needed and at the discretion of the Chair, the services of one or more analysts from the Library of Parliament to assist it in its work.
That the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure be established and be composed of four members; the chair and one member from each recognized party, as designated by each party's whip; and that the subcommittee work in a spirit of collaboration.
That the Chair be authorized to hold meetings to receive evidence and to have that evidence published when a quorum is not present, provided that at least four members are present, including two members of the opposition parties and two members of the government party.
That, when travelling outside the Parliamentary Precinct: (a) the meeting begin after 15 minutes, regardless of whether quorum is present; (b) no substantive motion may be moved during such meetings.
Concerning the time for opening remarks and questioning of witnesses, I move:
That witnesses be given five (5) minutes for their opening statements; that whenever possible, witnesses provide the committee with their opening statements 72 hours in advance; that, at the discretion of the Chair, during the questioning of witnesses, there be allocated six (6) minutes for the first questioner of each party as follows:
First Round:
Conservative Party
Liberal Party
Bloc Québécois
For the second and subsequent rounds, the order and time for questioning be as follows:
That only the clerk of the committee be authorized to distribute documents to members of the committee and only when the documents are in both official languages; and that all documents submitted to the committee in both official languages that do not come from a federal department or members' offices, or that have not been translated by the Translation Bureau, be sent for linguistic review by the Translation Bureau before being distributed to members, and that the witnesses be advised accordingly.
That the clerk of the committee, at the discretion of the Chair, be authorized to make the necessary arrangements to provide working meals for the committee and its subcommittees.
Concerning the travel, accommodation and living expenses of witnesses, I move:
That, if requested, reasonable travel, accommodation and living expenses be reimbursed to witnesses not exceeding two representatives per organization; and that in exceptional circumstances, payment for more representatives be made at the discretion of the Chair.
That, unless otherwise ordered, each committee member be allowed to be accompanied by one staff member at in camera meetings and that one additional person from each House officer's office be allowed to be present.
That, during in camera meetings, committee members may be informed by the committee Chair of the MPs who have been designated as substitutes for permanent members, in order to know which MPs are authorized to speak and vote during these committee meetings. That only those who have been recognized and identified as such be authorized to speak, in keeping with the usual agreed rules—
My colleague is reading the motion too quickly and the interpreters don't have the same documents. It's necessary to either give them the documents or to speak more slowly, so that we can get an accurate interpretation.
That, during in camera meetings, committee members may be informed by the committee Chair of the MPs who have been designated as substitutes for permanent members, in order to know which MPs are authorized to speak—
That, unless otherwise ordered, each committee member be allowed to be accompanied by one staff member at in camera meetings and that one additional person from each House officer's office be allowed to be present.
That, during in camera meetings, committee members may be informed by the committee Chair of the MPs who have been designated as substitutes for permanent members, in order to know which MPs are authorized to speak and vote during these committee meetings. That only those who have been recognized and identified as such be authorized to speak, in keeping with the usual agreed rules of order and decorum.
Regarding transcripts of in camera meetings, I move:
That one copy of the transcript of each in camera meeting be securely retained by the committee clerk for consultation by members of the committee or by their staff; and that the analysts assigned to the committee have access to the in camera transcripts.
That a 48‑hour notice, interpreted as two nights, be required for any substantive motion to be moved in committee, unless the substantive motion relates directly to business then under consideration, provided that:
(a) the notice be filed with the clerk of the committee no later than 4 p.m. from Monday to Thursday, and no later than 2:30 p.m. on Friday;
(b) the motion be distributed to members and the offices of the whips of each recognized party in both official languages by the clerk on the same day the said notice was transmitted if it was received no later than the deadline hour;
(c) notices received after the deadline hour or on non‑business days be deemed to have been received during the next business day.
On orders of reference from the House respecting bills, I move:
That in relation to orders of reference from the House respecting bills:
(a) the clerk of the committee shall, upon the committee receiving such an order of reference, write to each member who is not a member of a caucus represented on the committee to invite those members to file with the clerk of the committee, in both official languages, any amendments to the bill, which is the subject of the said order, which they would suggest that the committee consider;
(b) suggested amendments filed, pursuant to paragraph (a), at least 48 hours prior to the start of clause-by-clause consideration of the bill to which the amendments relate shall be deemed to be proposed during the said consideration, provided that the committee may, by motion, vary this deadline in respect of a given bill; and
[Translation]
(c) During the clause‑by‑clause consideration of a bill, the Chair shall allow a member who filed suggested amendments, pursuant to paragraph (a), an opportunity to make brief representations in support of them.
That the clerk inform each witness who is to appear before the committee that the House Administration support team must conduct technical tests to check the connectivity and the equipment used to ensure the best possible sound quality; and that the Chair advise the committee, at the start of each meeting, of any witness who did not perform the required technical tests.
That, during meetings, the Chair, if necessary, use his or her prerogative to suspend the meeting to maintain the order and decorum necessary to ensure the application of the House of Commons’ policies on workplace health and safety.
Having had a chance to discuss a couple of motions with most of the members of the committee, there were a couple of members who mentioned to me....
I have two motions. One is related to the Persian Gulf War study, and the other one is related to the “Reforming Transition from Military to Civilian Life” report from the last Parliament. I was under the impression that neither of them had received a government response. Some members seem to believe that the transition to civilian life report had received a government response.
I move that, given the committee members, staff, the clerk, analysts and witnesses worked hard to produce the report entitled “The Persian Gulf War Was a War” during the first session of the 44th Parliament, and given that the government did not table a response because of the prorogation of Parliament, the committee deem that it has undertaken and completed a study on “The Persian Gulf War was a War” pursuant to Standing Order 108, and that it adopt that report as a report from this committee; pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee request the government to table a comprehensive response to the report; supplementary or dissenting reports that accompanied the report in the previous session of Parliament should be tabled with the main report; and the chair present the report to the House.
I'd like to propose an amendment to the motion. The motion suggests that the reason for its not being tabled was that the government prorogued Parliament. I'm not convinced that is the case, given the lengthy filibuster that tied up the House in the last few months.
As opposed to trying to point fingers about whose fault it was that it wasn't tabled, I would simply ask that the reference to prorogation be deleted. We'd then be happy to support the motion.
We'll consider that a friendly amendment. I believe that was the reason, but I'm not fussing over it. Let's consider it a friendly amendment. I'm fine with it.
I just want to make sure that we can share.... I think we have to share it in both official languages to each member, or is it okay?
We're going to be sharing this motion, and don't forget that we have a friendly amendment. Is everybody in agreement? Mr. Richards said yes, but I need the consensus of all members to do the friendly amendment.
(Amendment agreed to)
The Chair: That's excellent. We will be sharing the original.
The Chair: I do have the answer. Indeed, it was not.
Okay. I would move the following. It would be a very similar motion:
That, given the committee members, staff, the clerk, analysts, and witnesses worked hard to produce the report entitled “Reforming Transition from Military to Civilian Life” during the first session of the 44th Parliament, and given that the government did not table a response, the committee deem that it has undertaken and completed a study on “Reforming Transition from Military to Civilian Life” pursuant to Standing Order 108, and that it adopt that report from this committee; pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee request the government to table a comprehensive response to the report; supplementary or dissenting reports that accompanied the report in the previous session of Parliament be tabled with the main report; and the Chair present the report to the House.
It's in the same form as the other one. I did remove the portion that was not acceptable to the government members.