Skip to main content
Parliament of Canada
Visit Parliament
Visit
Français
FR
Menu
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Career opportunities
Current Opportunities
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Youth Opportunities
Canada's Top Employers for Young People
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working at the House
Who we are and what we Offer
Canada's Capital Region
City of Ottawa
City of Gatineau
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Share this page
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Historical information
This a previous edition. For the latest publication, consult
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
, Third Edition, 2017
.
Table of Contents
Home Page
Introductory Pages
Parliamentary Institutions
Parliaments and Ministries
Privileges and Immunities
The House of Commons and Its Members
Parliamentary Procedure
The Physical and Administrative Setting
The Speaker and Other Presiding Officers of the House
The Parliamentary Cycle
Sittings of the House
The Daily Program
Questions
The Process of Debate
Rules of Order and Decorum
The Curtailment of Debate
Special Debates
The Legislative Process
Delegated Legislation
Financial Procedures
Committees of the Whole House
Introduction
Historical Perspective
Presiding Officers
Resolving into a Committee of the Whole
Conduct of Debate in a Committee of the Whole
Consideration of Bills in a Committee of the Whole
Consideration of Motions in a Committee of the Whole
Reporting of Proceedings
Notes 1-50
Notes 51-100
Notes 101-150
Notes 151-193
Committees
Private Members’ Business
Public Petitions
Private Bills Practice
The Parliamentary Record
Appendices
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
Edited by Robert Marleau and Camille Montpetit
2000 Edition
—
More information …
19. Committees of the Whole House
Print this section
|
Open/print full chapter
[151]
See, for example, the passage of the Bill C-74,
An Act respecting the supervision of longshoring and related operations at west coast ports
(
Journals
, March 15, 1995, pp. 1219-22). See also
Journals
, September 17, 1991, pp. 354-5; September 30, 1991, pp. 414, 417-9.
[152]
See
Chapter 16, “The Legislative Process”
, and
Chapter 20, “Committees”
.
[153]
This practice extends back to Confederation when consideration of the preamble was postponed while each clause was considered in its proper order; the preamble and title were considered last (see
Rules, Orders and Forms of Proceeding of the House of Commons of Canada
, 1868, Rule No. 46).
[154]
The Thirteenth Report of the Special Committee on Procedure and Organization recommended that consideration of Clause 1 should be postponed when it contained only a short title. See
Journals
, October 7, 1964, pp. 771-3. The recommendation was adopted on a provisional basis on October 9, 1964 (
Journals
, pp. 777-80), and the provisional changes were extended for the Twenty-Seventh Parliament (1966-68) (
Journals
, January 21, 1966, p. 34; April 26, 1967, pp. 1769-74). Permanent changes to the Standing Orders were adopted in December 1968 (
Journals
, December 20, 1968, pp. 554-62, in particular p. 560).
[155]
See, for example,
Debates
, September 30, 1991, pp. 2968-9.
[156]
See, for example,
Debates
, April 16, 1997, pp. 9843-4; November 24, 1997, pp. 2105-13. On one occasion, there was agreement in a Committee of the Whole for amendments to any of the clauses in the bill under consideration to be proposed on Clause 2. A general debate was held on all the amendments, but the question was not put on individual amendments until the clauses to which they applied were called. See
Debates
, March 15, 1995, pp. 10559, 10561.
[157]
Unanimous consent has been granted for the Chair to call a number of clauses as one group in order to expedite proceedings in a Committee of the Whole. See, for example,
Debates
, April 20, 1994, pp. 3291, 3294; May 25, 1994, p. 4416.
[158]
See, for example,
Debates
, October 6, 1998, pp. 8854-5.
[159]
See, for example,
Debates
, November 24, 1997, pp. 2107, 2112.
[160]
Beauchesne
, 6
th
ed., pp. 210, 250.
[161]
See, for example,
Debates
, September 30, 1991, pp. 2996-7.
[162]
In practice, if the presiding officer who has chaired the Committee of the Whole takes the Chair of the House as Speaker, he or she may simply invoke
pro forma
the name of another Member as presenting the report from the Committee of the Whole.
[163]
Standing Order 76.1(12). See, for example,
Debates
, April 20, 1994, p. 3291; December 2, 1997, p. 2618.
[164]
See, for example,
Journals
, April 20, 1994, pp. 375-6; June 20, 1994, pp. 617-8; March 12, 1997, p. 1262. This practice differs significantly for public bills reported back from standing, special or legislative committees. The Standing Orders require that every bill examined and reported by a committee be considered by the House at report stage. In the case of public bills reported back from a standing, special or legislative committee, report stage cannot begin sooner than the second day after the bill has been reported (see Standing Order 76.1(1)). At Confederation, amendments made in a Committee of the Whole were reported by the Chairman to the House which received the report forthwith (see
Rules, Orders and Forms of Proceeding of the House of Commons of Canada
, 1868, Rule No. 47). The rules then provided for debate and amendments to be moved to the bill before it was ordered for third reading. If the bill had not been amended in the Committee, it would be ordered for third reading at a time decided by the House. It was not until 1955 that the Standing Orders were amended to require a report from the Chairman of a Committee of the Whole to be received and the motion for concurrence in amendments to be disposed of forthwith (
Journals
, July 12, 1955, pp. 932-3).
[165]
Standing Order 76.1(11).
[166]
See Standing Order 71. See also
Journals
, February 24, 1969, pp. 738-9.
[167]
See, for example,
Debates
, April 20, 1994, p. 3291; June 18, 1996, p. 4039.
[168]
See, for example,
Debates
, December 21, 1988, p. 589; September 30, 1991, p. 2998.
[169]
An amendment to recommit to a Committee of the Whole a bill that had been considered previously by a standing committee was ruled out of order (see
Debates
, March 9, 1999, pp. 12645-6). For an example of a bill which was examined by a standing committee and recommitted to a Committee of the Whole by unanimous consent, see
Journals
, February 11, 1977, p. 464; July 25, 1977, p. 1441. Also refer to
Chapter 16, “The Legislative Process”
.
[170]
See, for example,
Journals
, April 3, 1882, pp. 248-9; March 27, 1933, pp. 343-4; April 25, 1952, pp. 231-2; June 27, 1952, pp. 604-5; March 1, 1962, pp. 182-3; July 25, 1977, p. 1441.
[171]
See, for example,
Journals
, February 17, 1928, p. 83; April 10, 1957, p. 445.
[172]
An instruction is a direction by the House to a committee, which has already received an order of reference, further defining its course of action or empowering it to do something. See
Chapter 16, “The Legislative Process”
, for more information.
[173]
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., pp. 395, 517. The object of a mandatory instruction is to define the course of action a committee must take. See also
Chapter 16, “The Legislative Process”
.
[174]
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., p. 398.
[175]
See, for example,
Journals
, May 20, 1971, p. 569; March 30, 1984, p. 324; December 2, 1997, pp. 313-4.
[176]
See, for example,
Journals
, March 19, 1948, pp. 268-9; July 30, 1956, pp. 942-3.
[177]
See, for example,
Journals
, April 15, 1920, p. 146.
[178]
Debate on the motion of instruction must be relevant to the object of the instruction and not the content of the bill. Amendments must be worded in such a way that if an amendment were adopted, the question would retain the form and effect of an instruction (
May
, 22
nd
ed., pp. 518-9).
[179]
See
Journals
, March 19, 1948, p. 269 (motion negatived); July 30, 1956, pp. 942-3 (motion negatived).
[180]
See
Journals
, April 15, 1920, p. 146.
[181]
See
Journals
, March 15, 1948, p. 255 (motion negatived).
[182]
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., p. 513. See, for example,
Journals
, May 2, 1872, p. 79; May 23, 1956, pp. 598-603.
[183]
Beauchesne
, 6
th
ed., p. 204.
[184]
A resolution is a motion adopted by the House in order to make a declaration of opinion or purpose. An address is a formal message to the Crown which may either express a wish or an opinion of the House or make a request. Addresses are used to express congratulations, etc., to the Royal Family and also to request the production of documents in the Crown’s possession.
[185]
In 1991, a Member sought to have the House sit as a Committee of the Whole during the debate on the crisis in the Persian Gulf to maximize the exchanges between Members. Consent was denied. See
Debates
, January 15, 1991, p. 16984.
[186]
For a brief period between 1975 and 1977, through provisional amendments to the Standing Orders on Supply proceedings, the House reinstated the former practice of referring selected items in the Estimates to a Committee of the Whole, where a resolution was subsequently agreed to and reported to the House for concurrence (
Journals
, March 14, 1975, pp. 372-6; March 24, 1975, p. 399). Though this provisional Standing Order was continued for another session through agreement (
Journals
, October 12, 1976, p. 12), it was not renewed thereafter. As an example, see
Journals
, May 9, 1975, pp. 533-4. This occurred again, most recently, in 1988 (
Journals
, January 28, 1988, p. 2076).
[187]
Motions which have been debated in a Committee of the Whole in the past have dealt with, among other matters, the naturalization of aliens (
Journals
, April 10, 1873, p. 147; April 5, 1875, p. 355), the establishment of provincial boundaries (
Journals
, April 29, 1889, pp. 383-5), the classification and organization of House of Commons Staff (
Journals
, June 5, 1913, pp. 785-8), and the ratification of agreements, conventions and treaties (
Journals
, March 20, 1925, pp. 148-9; June 8, 1942, p. 367).
[188]
See, for example,
Debates
, May 9, 1975, p. 5646; January 28, 1988, p. 12362. See
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., pp. 425-8, for a description of the consideration of resolutions in a Committee of Supply.
[189]
See, for example,
Debates
, May 9, 1975, p. 5670; January 28, 1988, p. 12371.
[190]
Standing Order 103. This Standing Order was adopted in 1955 to reflect a practice the House had previously followed for a number of years in connection with financial proceedings. For a recent example of the use of this Standing Order, see
Journals
, January 28, 1988, p. 2076. For a historical perspective on procedures relative to resolutions reported back from Committees of Supply and of Ways and Means, see
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., pp. 433-9; for reports from a Committee of the Whole, see
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., pp. 402-3. See also
Beauchesne
, 4
th
ed., pp. 207-8.
[191]
Beauchesne
, 5
th
ed., p. 150.
[192]
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., p. 399. Amendments and divisions have been recorded in the
Journals
, but the practice was exceptional. For an example of proceedings in a Committee of the Whole on a bill in the early years of Confederation, see
Journals
, April 22, 1870, pp. 230-1. Prior to 1968 when resolutions were adopted before the first reading of a bill, proceedings in regard to these resolutions in a Committee of the Whole were also recorded in the
Journals
(see, for example,
Journals
, June 21, 1965, p. 284). Proceedings of Committees of Supply and of Ways and Means were recorded in the
Journals
as were any resolutions providing for the expenditure of public money or the imposition of taxes. See, for example,
Journals
, October 19, 1962, pp. 124-5; May 28, 1965, p. 161. See also
Journals
, January 28, 1988, p. 2076, when the House resolved into a Committee of the Whole to consider an item in the Supplementary Estimates.
[193]
See, for example,
Journals
, August 27, 1987 pp. 1392-4; September 30, 1991, pp. 418-9; April 16, 1997, pp. 1478-9; December 2, 1997, p. 316; October 6, 1998, p. 2025. In 1971, proposed government amendments to a bill were tabled and printed as an Appendix to the
Votes and Proceedings
(
Journals
, October 13, 1971, p. 868; October 28, 1971, p. 895). The amendments were subsequently moved and printed in the
Debates
the following day (
Debates
, October 22, 1971, pp. 8934-61; October 29, 1971, pp. 9157-70). On another occasion, the Royal Recommendations covering amendments to be proposed in a Committee of the Whole were printed in the
Journals
(June 2, 1983, pp. 5954-7).