Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations
In 1971, pursuant to the Statutory
Instruments
Act, [13]
the House and the Senate established the Standing Joint Committee for the
Scrutiny of
Regulations. [14]
It
sat a few times between 1973 and 1974 for organizational purposes and began to
scrutinize statutory instruments in earnest in 1974 during the First Session of
the Thirtieth Parliament (September 1974 to October
1976). [15]
Mandate
The Committee’s mandate is defined by
the Statutory Instruments Act, the Statute Revision Act and the
Standing Orders. Pursuant to the Statutory Instruments Act, the Committee
can scrutinize any statutory instrument made on or after January 1,
1972. [16]
A statutory
instrument is “any rule, order, regulation, ordinance, direction, form,
tariff of costs or fees, letters patent, commission, warrant, proclamation,
by-law, resolution or other instrument issued, made or established … in the
execution of a power conferred by or under an Act of Parliament. …” [17]
The
Statutory Instruments Act further requires that regulations (with certain
exceptions) be published in the Canada Gazette and referred to the
parliamentary committee charged with the scrutiny of delegated
legislation. [18]
The Statute Revision Act authorizes
the Committee to scrutinize any regulation found in the 1978 Consolidated
Regulations of Canada or other Consolidated Regulations prepared pursuant to
that Act, even if that regulation were made prior to the coming into force of
the Statutory Instruments Act in
1972. [19]
The Standing
Orders expand on the mandates found in these two Acts by authorizing the
Committee to examine any other matter referred to it by both
Houses. [20]
Since 1979, the House and the Senate have
routinely renewed at the beginning of each session an additional order of
reference authorizing the Committee to:
… study the means by which Parliament
can better oversee the government regulatory process and in particular to
enquire into and report upon:
- the appropriate principles and practices to be observed
- in the drafting powers enabling delegates of Parliament to make subordinate laws;
- in the enactment of statutory instruments;
- in the use of executive regulation — including delegated powers and subordinate laws;
and the manner in which parliamentary control should be effected in respect of the same;
- the role, functions and powers of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of
Regulations. [21]
Membership
The Standing Joint Committee for the
Scrutiny of Regulations is composed of eight Senators and a proportionate number
of Members of the
House. [22]
There are
two Joint Chairs. Traditionally, one Joint Chair has been from the Senate
representing the government party and one Joint Chair has been from the House
representing the Official
Opposition. [23]
The
Committee’s Vice-Chair is usually a Member of the House from the government
benches.
Powers
The Committee enjoys the same powers other
standing committees have. It may sit while the House is
sitting [24]
and when
the House stands adjourned; print papers and evidence; send for persons, papers
and records; and delegate to a subcommittee all or any of its powers (except the
power to report directly to the House). It may also table reports in the House
and request government responses to
them. [25]
In addition,
the Committee has the “power to engage the services of such expert staff,
and such stenographic and clerical staff as may be
required.” [26]
Finally, the Committee has the power to initiate the revocation of a statutory
instrument. [27]
This
power is discussed in greater detail below.
Review Criteria
The Committee reviews only matters of
legality and the procedural aspects of regulations — their merits and the
policies they reflect are
disregarded. [28]
The Committee reviews all statutory
instruments referred to it on the basis of 13 criteria which it provides to both
Houses at the beginning of each session in its first
report. [29]
The
criteria found in the report are as
follows: [30]
Your Committee informs both Houses of
Parliament that the criteria it will use for the review and scrutiny of
statutory instruments are the following:
Whether any regulation or statutory
instrument within its terms of reference, in the judgement of the
Committee,
- is not authorized by the terms of the
enabling legislation or has not complied with any condition set forth in the
legislation; [31]
- is not in conformity with the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or the Canadian Bill of
Rights; [32]
- purports to have retroactive effect
without express authority having been provided for in the enabling
legislation; [33]
- imposes a charge on the public
revenues or requires payment to be made to the Crown or to any other authority,
or prescribes the amount of any such charge or payment, without express
authority having been provided for in the enabling
legislation; [34]
- imposes a fine, imprisonment or other
penalty without express authority having been provided for in the enabling
legislation;
- tends directly or indirectly to
exclude the jurisdiction of the courts without express authority having been
provided for in the enabling legislation;
- has not complied with the Statutory
Instruments Act with respect to transmission, registration or
publication;
- appears for any reason to infringe
the rule of law; [35]
- trespasses unduly on rights and
liberties; [36]
- makes the rights and liberties of
the person unduly dependent on administrative discretion or is not consistent
with the rules of natural
justice; [37]
- makes some unusual or unexpected use
of the powers conferred by the enabling
legislation; [38]
- amounts to the exercise of a
substantive legislative power properly the subject of direct parliamentary
enactment; [39]
- is defective in its drafting or for
any other reason requires elucidation as to its form or
purport. [40]
The Committee’s scrutiny criteria are very
similar to those used by the Clerk of the Privy Council to verify proposed
regulations [41]
and
those recommended by the Special Committee on Statutory Instruments in
1969. [42]