|
Q-838
|
Wednesday, February 4, 2026 |
With regard to the Canada Carbon Rebate fund and the carbon tax: (a) are reports that there are $141 million in cheques for the Canada Carbon Rebate which have not yet been cashed accurate, and, if not, what is the value of Canada Carbon Rebate cheques which have not yet been cashed; (b) does the government know why the cheques have not been cashed, and, if so, what is the breakdown by reason, including the government's estimates on the value of the cheques associated with each reason (wrong address, wrong name, deceased, etc.); (c) for each year between 2020 and 2025, how much was collected through the carbon tax; (d) for each year between 2020 and 2025, how much was paid out through the Canada Carbon Rebate; and (e) if the revenue collected in (c) is higher than the amount paid out in (d), will the government be returning that carbon tax revenue to Canadians, and, if so, how, or will it be kept as general revenue? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, March 23, 2026 |
|
Q-789
|
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
With regard to costs paid by the government in relation to public servants working from home since January 1, 2022, broken down by department or agency, and by year: (a) what is the total amount spent by the government related to public servants working from home; and (b) what is the breakdown of these expenditures by category, including (i) internet or telecommunications costs, (ii) electricity or utility reimbursements, (iii) office furniture such as desks and chairs, (iv) computer equipment and peripherals, (v) office supplies, (vi) any other related expenses? |
Awaiting response |
Friday, March 13, 2026 |
|
Q-501
|
Tuesday, October 21, 2025 |
With regard to the agreements entered into by the government with Volkswagen related to the establishment of an electric vehicle battery manufacturing facility in St. Thomas, Ontario: (a) do any of the agreements include a requirement for the facility to use, and be built with, Canadian steel, as opposed to foreign steel; (b) if a requirement to use Canadian steel is included, what are the details of that part of the agreement; and (c) if there is no requirement to use Canadian steel, why did the government not include such a requirement? |
Answered |
Monday, December 8, 2025 |
|
Q-446
|
Wednesday, October 8, 2025 |
With regard to the Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program: (a) who are the external service providers contracted as part of the program; (b) what is the total amount of funding provided to each service provider; and (c) what services is each service provider providing? |
Answered |
Monday, November 24, 2025 |
|
Q-438
|
Wednesday, October 8, 2025 |
With regard to the Housing Accelerator Fund in the province of Ontario, broken down by community
or municipality: how many homes (i) are currently under construction, (ii) have been completed,
with money provided through the fund? |
Answered |
Monday, November 24, 2025 |
|
Q-424
|
Tuesday, October 7, 2025 |
With regard to reports that some municipalities have spent money received through the Housing Accelerator Fund on general needs, repairs, or operating costs, rather than on housing projects: (a) how, specifically, is the government ensuring that Housing Accelerator Fund recipients are using the money received for housing and not as general revenue; and (b) how many instances has the government identified where municipalities used the Housing Accelerator Fund for purposes other than directly for housing, including, for each, (i) the municipality, (ii) the amount received, (iii) a description of the project for which the money was used, (iv) any penalty issued for not using the money for housing, if applicable? |
Answered |
Monday, November 24, 2025 |
|
Q-118
|
Thursday, June 5, 2025 |
With regard to the government’s announcement in budget 2024 that they will create a new “capstone research funding organization”: (a) what will be the purpose of this organization; (b) how much money has been allocated to, or is projected to be required by, this organization to date and over each of the next five fiscal years; (c) what specific gaps, deficiencies, or coordination challenges in the current federal research support system is this new capstone organization intending to address; (d) what is expected to be achieved by the organization in the (i) short, (ii) medium, (iii) long, term; (e) how will capstone fit in organizationally with the (i) Canadian Institutes of Health Research, (ii) Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, (iii) Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; (f) will the new capstone organization have any funding authority or influence over any of the entities in (e), and, if so, what are the details; (g) how will the government avoid duplication between the work of capstone and the other entities in (e); (h) what impact, if any, will the establishment and funding of capstone have on the funding of the other entities in (e); (i) what metrics will be used to assess the impact of the new capstone organization, and whether or not the government is receiving value for its money; (j) how often will the assessments in (i) take place, and how will the results be made public; (k) what will be the composition of the board, or other governing body of the capstone, and how much will they be paid; and (l) on what date is capstone expected to be fully operational? |
Answered |
Monday, September 15, 2025 |
|
Q-39
|
Tuesday, May 27, 2025 |
With regard to the government's response to Order Paper Question Q-3051 of the first session of the 44th Parliament showing the number of taxpayers in each riding that received the Canada Carbon Rebate rural supplement: what is the government's explanation for why certain individuals in completely urban ridings, such as Winnipeg Centre, Ottawa Centre and numerous completely urban ridings in the Greater Toronto Area, are receiving the rural supplement? |
Answered |
Monday, September 15, 2025 |
