|
Q-1514
|
Monday, October 5, 2026 |
With regard to the $235 million loan provided by the Canada Development Investment Corporation, through the Large Enterprise Tariff Loan facility, to Arctic Canadian Diamond Company Ltd.: (a) what is the total amount actually disbursed to date; (b) on what exact date was the funding agreement signed, and on what dates was funding disbursed; (c) what are the details of the funding agreement, including the type of funding, the interest rate, the repayment schedule, the maturity date, the security or collateral provided, any guarantees, and any covenants or performance requirements; (d) what specific conditions or stipulations, if any, were attached to the funds regarding the protection or continuation of jobs, payments to contractors or suppliers, regulatory compliance, or payments under Impact and Benefit Agreements with Indigenous groups; (e) did the corporation require, as a condition of the funding, that Impact and Benefit Agreement payments to Indigenous nations or organizations and payments to contractors be maintained or prioritized, and, if so, what are the details of these stipulations and any monitoring or enforcement mechanisms; (f) what oversight, reporting requirements, or audits has the government put in place to ensure compliance with the funding terms; (g) as of the most recent date available, has the recipient been in compliance with all conditions, particularly regarding Impact and Benefit Agreement payments and contractor payments, and, if not, what actions has the government taken; (h) what is the current status of the funding (outstanding balance, any defaults, restructuring, or implications of the company entering creditor protection or Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings); (i) what analysis regarding the financial viability of the mine and the risks to taxpayers did the government conduct prior to approving the funds; and (j) are there any conditions or restrictions on executive compensation or management bonus payments in the agreement with the company, and, if so, what are the details of these restrictions? |
Awaiting response |
Friday, November 20, 2026 |
|
Q-1513
|
Monday, October 5, 2026 |
With regard to the government's conditional sale of 10 retired CC-130H Hercules aircraft to Coulson Aviation (Canada) Ltd., announced on August 7, 2026: (a) who approved the sale and on what date was the decision approved; (b) what was the process used by the government to select Coulson Aviation (Canada) Ltd. as the purchaser; (c) was the sale, or any portion of the opportunity to acquire and convert the aircraft for civilian aerial firefighting purposes, publicly tendered or otherwise made available to other Canadian companies, and, if so, how was it made available; (d) if the sale was not publicly tendered, why not; (e) what was the purchase price of the 10 aircraft, and what other financial or non-financial considerations formed part of the agreement; (f) were any other Canadian aerospace or aerial firefighting companies given an opportunity to propose the acquisition, conversion, maintenance and operation of the aircraft; and (g) does the government have plans to provide other Canadian aircraft operators or companies with an opportunity to acquire or otherwise access surplus military aircraft for civilian aerial firefighting purposes in the future, and, if so, what are the details of such plans? |
Awaiting response |
Friday, November 20, 2026 |
|
Q-1267
|
Monday, June 8, 2026 |
With regard to the Assault Style Firearms Compensation Program and the related Amnesty Order: (a) when the program began, how many individuals does the government estimate were in possession of impacted firearms; (b) how many individuals have communicated an intent to comply by October 30, 2026, by (i) turning in a firearm for compensation, (ii) rendering the firearm inoperable, (iii) otherwise disposing of the firearm; (c) for those who have not yet communicated an intent to comply, has the government undertaken plans to increase compliance, including further incentives to comply, an extension of the amnesty period to encourage compliance or enforcement actions against those who are non-compliant; and (d) has the National Weapons Enforcement Support Team communicated with Chief Firearms Officers or police of local jurisdiction to identify targets for enforcement action, and, if so, what are the details, including the dates of all such communication? |
Answered |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1208
|
Thursday, May 21, 2026 |
With regard to government loans and other financial support provided since January 1, 2025, to Arctic Canadian Diamond Company Ltd. : (a) what is the total amount of funding approved or disbursed through (i) the Large Enterprise Tariff Loan facility, (ii) other federal programs, broken down by each; (b) on what exact date was each agreement for the funding signed, and on what dates was funding disbursed; (c) what are the details of each funding agreement, including the amount of funding, the type of funding, the interest rates, the repayment schedule, the maturity date, the security or collateral provided, any guarantees, and any covenants or performance requirements; (d) what specific conditions or stipulations, if any, were attached to the funds regarding the protection or continuation of jobs, payments to contractors or suppliers, regulatory compliance, or payments under Impact and Benefit Agreements with Indigenous groups; (e) did the government require, as a condition of the funding, that Impact and Benefit Agreement payments to Indigenous nations or organizations and payments to contractors be maintained or prioritized, and, if so, what are the details of these stipulations and any monitoring or enforcement mechanisms; (f) what oversight, reporting requirements, or audits has the government put in place to ensure compliance with the funding terms; (g) as of the most recent date available, has the recipient been in compliance with all conditions, particularly regarding Impact and Benefit Agreement payments and contractor payments, and, if not, what actions has the government taken; (h) what is the current status of the funding (outstanding balance, any defaults, restructuring, or implications of the company entering creditor protection or Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings); (i) what analysis regarding the financial viability of the mine and the risks to taxpayers did the government conduct prior to approving the funds; and (j) are there any conditions or restrictions on executive compensation or management bonus payments in any of the agreements with the company, and, if so, under what agreements do these restrictions exist? |
Answered |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1162
|
Wednesday, April 29, 2026 |
With regard to the Giant Mine remediation project and the statement sent by Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada to Cabin Radio that the project is regularly reviewed through audits, evaluations, and financial checks: what are the details of each such audit, evaluation and financial check on the project since 2016, including (i) the date, (ii) the type of assessment, (iii) the scope, (iv) who conducted it, (v) the findings? |
Answered |
Monday, June 15, 2026 |
|
Q-1161
|
Wednesday, April 29, 2026 |
With regard to the Giant Mine remediation project: (a) how much has been spent to date; (b) how much has been budgeted for the project; (c) what are the estimated annual costs for the post-remediation maintenance of the project; and (d) what are the details of all the contracts signed for the post-remediation phase, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) value, (iv) summary of the goods or services, (v) duration, (vi) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid)? |
Answered |
Monday, June 15, 2026 |
|
Q-997
|
Monday, March 23, 2026 |
With regard to contracts signed by the government with NVision Insight Group Inc., Nunavut Holdings Inc., and Carvings Nunavut Inc. since September 20, 2021, broken down by department or agency and by year: (a) what is the total value of the contracts; (b) what are the details of each contract, including the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) value, (iv) description of the goods or services provided, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid); and (c) for each contract, did the government do a value-for-money assessment, and, if so, what was the result? |
Answered |
Friday, May 8, 2026 |
|
Q-996
|
Monday, March 23, 2026 |
With regard to the repeal of the federal consumer fuel charge effective April 1, 2025, and the treatment of fuel inventory purchased prior to the repeal: (a) what measures, if any, has the government developed to address carbon charges embedded in fuel inventory held by retailers or Indigenous communities as of March 31, 2025; (b) which department or agency is responsible for designing and implementing any such measure; (c) what policy options were assessed in relation to refunding or crediting carbon charges embedded in unsold inventory; (d) did the government consider an inventory-based refund or credit mechanism, and, if so, what conclusions were reached; (e) what timeline has been established for providing guidance or implementing a corrective mechanism, including target dates; and (f) what engagement has occurred with industry or Indigenous representatives regarding this matter, and what feedback was received? |
Answered |
Friday, May 8, 2026 |
