|
Q-1417
|
Thursday, September 17, 2026 |
With regard to documents prepared by government departments or agencies about cyber-sex trafficking, organ trafficking, human trafficking, slavery, modern slavery, forced labour, sex trafficking, the Chief Advisor to Combat Human Trafficking, or prostitution, since April 20, 2021: for any such document, what is the (i) date, (ii) title or subject matter, (iii) type of document (routine correspondence, directive, options to consider, etc.), (iv) department’s internal tracking number, (v) sender and recipient, if applicable, (vi) summary of the contents? |
Awaiting response |
Wednesday, November 4, 2026 |
|
Q-1416
|
Thursday, September 17, 2026 |
With regard to medical assistance in dying and Veterans Affairs Canada, since September 2022: (a) has Veterans Affairs Canada received any information, confirmed or unconfirmed, through internal reports, complaints, audits or other channels indicating that a (i) Veterans Affairs Canada employee, (ii) third-party contractor, may have discussed, suggested or advised a veteran on medical assistance in dying; (b) if the answer to (a) is affirmative, what was the (i) date, (ii) internal briefing note, (iii) participant, (iv) tracking number; (c) in the event of medical assistance in dying being offered or suggested to a veteran by a Veterans Affairs Canada employee or contractor, what procedures does the government have to (i) discipline or provide corrective action for the employee or contractor, (ii) compensate the veteran; and (d) does the government have in place a safe and appropriate channel that a veteran may use to file a complaint that medical assistance in dying has been (i) offered, (ii) discussed, (iii) suggested, by either a Veterans Affairs Canada employee or contractor, and, if so, what is the channel and how may veterans access it? |
Awaiting response |
Wednesday, November 4, 2026 |
|
Q-1415
|
Thursday, September 17, 2026 |
With regard to Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada and the Canadian Intellectual Property Office, and the transition from paper to electronic patent filing and the development of the MyCIPO Patents platform: (a) what was the original projected total cost and implementation deadline for the initiative; (b) broken down by fiscal year since April 1, 2020, what were the (i) budgeted, (ii) actual, expenditures for the initiative; (c) what is the current estimated final cost and implementation deadline for the initiative, and if these differ from the original projections in (a), what are the documented causes; (d) has the initiative undergone any (i) independent review, (ii) audit, (iii) Treasury Board gating assessment, and, if so, when, by whom, and what were the findings and tracking numbers for the documents; (e) broken down by fiscal year and month since April 1, 2016, (i) how many patent applications were filed by paper versus electronically in each fiscal year, (ii) how many were approved respectively, (iii) what was the average delay for patent applications, (iv) what is the longest delay, in terms of time, for a patent application; and (f) what are the details of all contracts signed in relation to the transition, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) value, (iv) description of the goods or services provided, (v) file number? |
Awaiting response |
Wednesday, November 4, 2026 |
|
Q-1414
|
Thursday, September 17, 2026 |
With regard to government measures to stop the importation of goods made using forced labour from countries other than China, since 2016, and broken down by year: (a) how many times have such goods been intercepted or seized at points of entry by the Canada Border Services Agency or the Royal Canadian Mounted Police; and (b) what are the details of each instance in (a), including (i) the date, (ii) the description of the goods, including the quantity, (iii) the estimated value of the goods, (iv) the point of entry or location, (v) the source country of the goods, (vi) what happened to the intercepted or seized goods, (vii) the charges laid related to the interception or seizure? |
Awaiting response |
Wednesday, November 4, 2026 |
|
Q-1120
|
Thursday, April 23, 2026 |
With regard to the announcement on March 16, 2026 by the Minister of National Defence to lease land from Maritime Launch Services through a 10-year, $200-million agreement: (a) what are the details of all emails, memorandums, notes, or other documents related to the topic since October 1, 2016, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) title, (v) form (email, memorandum, etc.); (b) what was the criteria used to determine that Maritime Launch Services met the defence and security priorities of the government; (c) did any other applicants apply and what are the details around each application; (d) on what date did the minister learn that Maritime Launch Services was leasing the same land from the province of Nova Scotia for $13,500 per year; (e) what was the rationale for Maritime Launch Services being exempt from a federal impact assessment of the dedicated space-launch pad; (f) what was the rational for backdating the $200 million lease to April 1, 2025 and providing Maritime Launch Services with $20 million for the existing undeveloped concrete pad for the first year of the term ending March 31, 2026; (g) what are the details of all documents outlining the government’s plans to ensure Maritime Launch Services provides a dedicated launch pad and associated services at an initial operational capability state by the end of 2026, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) title, (v) form (email, memorandum, etc.), (vi) file number; and (h) on what date did the minister receive the report from Canada’s Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization and what was the response to the finding that Maritime Launch Services' current Chair of the Board had his membership suspended and later revoked for misconduct? |
Answered |
Wednesday, June 10, 2026 |
|
Q-1109
|
Thursday, April 23, 2026 |
With regard to the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise: (a) on what date did the Ombudsperson position become vacant; (b) has the position remained vacant since that date; (c) how many complaints and investigations were open at the time the position became vacant, broken down by sector and country of alleged harm; (d) what is the current status of each case in (c) and which official or office is responsible for managing them; (e) what is the government's timeline and current stage for appointing a new Ombudsperson; (f) how many Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise investigations have resulted in recommendations to companies, broken down by year, sector, and country; (g) in how many cases were recommendations implemented in full, in part, or not at all; (h) how many investigations have been discontinued, suspended, or delayed due to company non-cooperation, broken down by year and sector, and what percentage of total investigations does this represent; and (i) what is the reason the final Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise report submitted to the Minister of International Trade was not tabled in Parliament as required by Order in Council? |
Answered |
Wednesday, June 10, 2026 |
|
Q-1108
|
Thursday, April 23, 2026 |
With regard to the Memorandum of Understanding signed between the Government of Canada and the Government of Alberta: (a) what actions has the government taken to advance pipeline projects identified, contemplated, or enabled under the Memorandum of Understanding, including, but not limited to, regulatory approvals, project designations, or intergovernmental negotiations; (b) has the government entered into any discussions with pipeline proponents, investors, or provincial officials regarding the approval, expansion, or construction of pipeline infrastructure pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding, and, if so, what were the details of each of those discussions, including the (i) dates, (ii) participants, (iii) subject matter; (c) has the government issued, or prepared any orders, directives, exemptions, or regulatory amendments to facilitate pipeline development under the Memorandum of Understanding, and, if so, what are the details of each; (d) has the government designated, or is it preparing to designate, any pipeline projects as being in the “national interest” or subject to expedited review processes as referenced in the Memorandum of Understanding, and, if so, which projects and under what authority; (e) what are the details of any (i) internal analyses, (ii) briefing notes, (iii) memoranda, (iv) communications which have been prepared since November 27, 2025, regarding pipeline development under the Memorandum of Understanding, including assessments of economic, environmental, and legal implications; (f) has the government engaged with Indigenous communities, rights holders, or organizations regarding pipeline-related components of the Memorandum of Understanding, and, if so, what consultations or discussions have taken place and what issues were raised; (g) what timelines, if any, has the government established to operationalize pipeline-related commitments under the Memorandum of Understanding; (h) how much funding has been allocated to the implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding and from what funding envelope; (i) has the government appointed individuals to the Implementation Committee, and, if so, who has been appointed and on what date was each individual appointed; and (j) for the four agreements to be delivered by the Implementation Committee by April 1, 2026, what are the details of all internal analyses, briefing notes, memoranda, or communications prepared on the agreements, and on what date was each agreement completed? |
Answered |
Wednesday, June 10, 2026 |
|
Q-1077
|
Friday, April 17, 2026 |
With regard to reports that the government is purchasing Canadian flags and Canadian flag pins made outside of Canada: (a) what are the details of all purchases of Canadian flags, Canadian flag pins and similar types of products by Canadian Heritage or Public Services and Procurement Canada, since January 1, 2022, including, for each, the (i) vendor, (ii) amount spent, (iii) types of products (full size flags, desktop flags, paper flags, etc.), (iv) volume of each type of product, (v) date, (vi) country where each product was manufactured; and (b) for each instance in (a) where the products purchased were manufactured outside of Canada, why wasn't a Canadian manufacturer chosen? |
Answered |
Wednesday, June 3, 2026 |
