Skip to main content
Parliament of Canada
Visit Parliament
Visit
Français
FR
Menu
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Career opportunities
Current Opportunities
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Youth Opportunities
Canada's Top Employers for Young People
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working at the House
Who we are and what we Offer
Canada's Capital Region
City of Ottawa
City of Gatineau
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Share this page
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Historical information
This a previous edition. For the latest publication, consult
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
, Third Edition, 2017
.
Table of Contents
Home Page
Introductory Pages
Parliamentary Institutions
Parliaments and Ministries
Privileges and Immunities
The House of Commons and Its Members
Parliamentary Procedure
The Physical and Administrative Setting
The Speaker and Other Presiding Officers of the House
The Parliamentary Cycle
Sittings of the House
The Daily Program
Introduction
Daily Proceedings
Routine Proceedings
Government Orders
Private Members’ Business
Adjournment Proceedings
Weekly Business Statement
Notes 1-50
Notes 51-100
Notes 101-150
Notes 151-200
Notes 201-250
Notes 251-300
Notes 301-350
Notes 351-354
Questions
The Process of Debate
Rules of Order and Decorum
The Curtailment of Debate
Special Debates
The Legislative Process
Delegated Legislation
Financial Procedures
Committees of the Whole House
Committees
Private Members’ Business
Public Petitions
Private Bills Practice
The Parliamentary Record
Appendices
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
Edited by Robert Marleau and Camille Montpetit
2000 Edition
—
More information …
10. The Daily Program
Print this section
|
Open/print full chapter
[251]
Standing Order 39(3)(
a
).
[252]
This procedure began on July 17, 1963 (see
Debates
, July 17, 1963, p. 2295). Prior to this, the procedure was very time-consuming: the Speaker went through the entire list of questions each Monday and Wednesday, with the Minister or Parliamentary Secretary interrupting on occasion to say “Answered” when they wished to table a reply (see
Stewart
, p. 65).
[253]
See, for example,
Debates
, June 16, 1992, pp. 12116-7; March 14, 1995, pp. 10430-1; February 2, 1998, pp. 3195-6; October 28, 1998, pp. 9522-3.
[254]
See, for example,
Debates
, May 15, 1989, p. 1694; May 14, 1990, pp. 11372-3; February 2, 1998, p. 3196; September 21, 1998, pp. 8174-7; April 30, 1999, p. 14549.
[255]
Standing Order 39(7). See, for example,
Journals
, September 23, 1994, p. 725; December 13, 1996, pp. 1018-9. See
Journals
, April 2, 1998, p. 664, for an example of a revised return being tabled.
[256]
See, for example,
Debates
, March 13, 1995, p. 10397; March 17, 1995, p. 10671.
[257]
Standing Order 42(1).
[258]
Standing Order 39(5)(
b
).
[259]
Journals
, April 29, 1910, pp. 536-7.
[260]
Journals
, July 12, 1955, pp. 888-9.
[261]
Journals
, September 26, 1961, pp. 949-50, 953; September 27, 1961, p. 957.
[262]
Journals
, April 10, 1962, pp. 338-9; April 12, 1962, p. 350.
[263]
For examples of notices of motions (papers) placed on the Order of Precedence for Private Members’ Business, debated and adopted, see
Journals
, October 2, 1998, p. 1115; November 2, 1998, p. 1221. See also
Chapter 21, “Private Members’ Business”
.
[264]
Prior to 1876, all motions for papers were Addresses to the Governor General (
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., p. 245).
[265]
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., p. 249.
[266]
Journals
, February 15, 1960, pp. 137-40, in particular p. 138.
[267]
Up until April 1964, when the rubric “Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers” was called, the Speaker would go through the list of motions seriatim. If a motion for papers was adopted, the government would then compile (“produce”) the information ordered for presentation on a later date in the House. (See
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., pp. 248-9). In 1964, a procedure committee proposed that “Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers” be called on Wednesday and be handled in a manner similar to that being practised with respect to written questions, namely by an announcement that certain ones be accepted, certain ones be accepted subject to qualifications, certain ones might be called and the rest be allowed to stand (
Journals
, April 15, 1964, pp. 213-4; April 20, 1964, pp. 223-6).
[268]
As with the tabling of documents and replies to questions on the
Order Paper
, today’s practice is usually for the Parliamentary Secretary to the Government House Leader to reply on behalf of the government.
[269]
Standing Order 97(1). See, for example,
Debates
, December 10, 1980, p. 5594; February 4, 1981, pp. 6888-9; June 15, 1983, p. 26414. On at least one occasion, a recorded division was requested after the government had agreed to produce a document (see
Debates
, December 14, 1994, p. 9072) while in another instance a revised return was tabled (
Debates
, October 28, 1981, p. 12281).
[270]
The procedure by which these motions are debated is examined in
Chapter 21, “Private Members’ Business”
.
[271]
Standing Order 97(1). See, for example,
Debates
, February 4, 1981, p. 6888; February 2, 1983, p. 22431; February 18, 1998, p. 4078; February 25, 1998, p. 4409; April 22, 1998, p. 5964. The Minister’s reservation about producing certain documents because of their confidential nature becomes a matter of record (see
Journals
, February 27, 1961, pp. 295-7). In 1981, Speaker Sauvé ruled that the expression “confidential documents” had never been defined and that it would be improper for the Speaker to attempt to do so. She underlined that it is the government’s prerogative to decide which documents are of a confidential nature (
Debates
, June 18, 1981, p. 10738).
[272]
The procedure by which these motions are debated is examined in
Chapter 21, “Private Members’ Business”
.
[273]
See, for example,
Debates
, December 17, 1980, p. 5854; March 18, 1981, pp. 8377-8.
[274]
Standing Order 97(1). See, for example,
Debates
, February 17, 1982, pp. 15107-8; July 14, 1982, p. 19331; February 4, 1998, p. 3328; December 2, 1998, p. 10793. See also ruling of Deputy Speaker Milliken,
Debates
, November 25, 1998, pp. 10436-7. The procedure by which these motions are debated is examined in
Chapter 21, “Private Members’ Business”
.
[275]
See, for example,
Debates
, May 6, 1992, p. 10239.
[276]
Standing Order 97(1). See, for example,
Debates
, December 9, 1981, p. 13891; December 16, 1981, pp. 14129-30; February 24, 1982, p. 15350; March 31, 1982, pp. 16015-6; August 4, 1982, pp. 20020-1; December 1, 1982, p. 21175; May 30, 1984, pp. 4197-8; April 29, 1998, p. 6297; May 6, 1998, p. 6608; June 3, 1998, pp. 7537-8; November 25, 1998, pp. 10436-7. The procedure by which these motions are debated is examined in
Chapter 21, “Private Members’ Business”
.
[277]
Standing Order 97(1). See, for example,
Debates
, March 31, 1982, p. 16015.
[278]
Standing Order 42(1). See, for example,
Debates
, March 25, 1998, p. 5341; June 10, 1998, p. 7936.
[279]
Journals
, March 15, 1973, p. 187.
[280]
Debates
, March 15, 1973, p. 2288. This document was referred to the Standing Joint Committee on Regulations and other Statutory Instruments on March 29, 1973 (
Journals
, p. 226). See also
Debates
, March 29, 1973, pp. 2745-50. In 1974, the President of the Privy Council tabled the guidelines again and they were subsequently referred to the same committee (
Journals
, December 19, 1974, pp. 229, 231). The Committee did not report back to the House on this matter on either occasion.
[281]
See, for example, ruling of Speaker Sauvé,
Debates
, November 16, 1982, pp. 20702-3.
[282]
See, for example,
Debates
, November 21, 1979, pp. 1557-8.
[283]
See, for example,
Debates
, July 15, 1982, pp. 19361-2.
[284]
Standing Order 49.
[285]
Standing Order 30(5) and (6). The time for Government Orders may be increased if a Member moves a motion, without notice, to continue or to extend a sitting beyond the fixed hour of daily adjournment in order to continue the consideration of a particular government order, and the motion is adopted (see Standing Order 26). In addition, as the House moves towards the summer adjournment, a Minister may propose a motion during Routine Proceedings to extend the hours of sitting of the House in the last 10 sitting days of June (see Standing Order 27). These longer hours are typically used for the consideration of government business. See
Chapter 9, “Sittings of the House.”
[286]
See
Rules, Orders and Forms of Proceeding of the House of Commons of Canada
, 1868, Rule No. 19.
[287]
Journals
, April 10, 1962, pp. 338-9; April 12, 1962, p. 350.
[288]
See the Third Report of the Special Committee on Standing Orders and Procedure,
Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence
, November 4, 1982, Issue No. 7, pp. 14-5, presented on November 5, 1982 (
Journals
, p. 5328), and the motion adopted by the House on November 29, 1982 (
Journals
, p. 5400).
[289]
See the First Report of the Special Committee on Standing Orders,
Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence
, December 15, 1983, Issue No. 2, pp. 3-4, presented December 15, 1983 (
Journals
, p. 47), and the motion adopted by the House on December 19, 1983 (
Journals
, pp. 55-6).
[290]
The amount of time available daily to the government for the consideration of its business has fluctuated over the years depending on the hours of sitting and adjournment of the House. For example, in 1990, 18 hours a week were set aside for Government Orders; this grew to 25 hours the following year. In 1994, time available for Government Orders was readjusted when the ordinary hour of daily adjournment was altered and the daily midday interruption for the lunch hour was removed.
[291]
See
Stewart
, pp. 71-2, for a history of the term “Orders of the Day”.
[292]
Standing Order 66. Prior to 1965, resumed debate on motions moved during Routine Proceedings took place under that rubric on the next sitting day. On several occasions, motions to concur in committee reports were debated at length over a number of days, thus preventing the House from considering any further items on the
Order Paper
. In 1965, the Standing Orders were amended in such a way that the government was obliged to call resumed debate on adjourned or interrupted motions as the first item under Government Orders on the next sitting day. This change prevented continued debate on a motion from keeping the House from considering other items of Routine Proceedings or from having a Question Period (
Journals
, June 11, 1965, pp. 224, 226). Three years later, the House concurred in a report from a special committee which recommended that the government be permitted to call such business in the order it chooses without restriction (
Journals
, December 20, 1968, p. 571).
[293]
See Standing Order 41.
[294]
Standing Order 40(2). However, in order to be considered, any government business must meet the necessary notice requirement (Standing Order 54). This Standing Order was first included in the rules of the House in 1906 (
Debates
, July 9, 1906, cols. 7477-80;
Journals
, July 10, 1906, pp. 579-80).
[295]
In 1987, the Speaker cited this rule when the Opposition challenged the right of the government to call a bill for debate even though, as they claimed, its text was in imperfect form. Despite the charge, the Speaker agreed to allow debate without prejudice to any ruling that might be rendered because, as he stated, under the terms of the rule, the government was within its right to carry on with the debate. See
Debates
, January 23, 1987, pp. 2651-3. See also
Debates
, October 29, 1987, pp. 10508-9; May 25, 1988, pp. 15773-5; April 2, 1993, p. 18002; June 1, 1994, pp. 4709-10.
[296]
See “Weekly Business Statement” later in this chapter.
[297]
The hybrid nature of Supply motions, which are formulated by Members of the opposition yet considered under Government Orders, gave rise to one of the few instances in recent years where the Speaker invoked Standing Order 40(2) to resolve a dispute. On February 11, 1982, the Government House Leader announced that a Supply day set for the following day would be postponed by one week. When the opposition objected, the Speaker ruled that as Supply motions fall under Government Orders, they can be “called and considered in sequence as the government determines” (
Debates
, pp. 14896-9).
[298]
Standing Order 81(1).
[299]
Standing Order 81(2).
[300]
At the beginning of a session, Private Members’ Business does not take place until the establishment of an Order of Precedence (Standing Order 91).