|
Q-1483
|
Wednesday, September 23, 2026 |
With regard to the Department of Finance and the Privy Council Office, since April 1, 2024: what are the details of all documents related to consultations with provinces or territories about equalization, the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act or similar topics, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) title, (iii) author, (iv) recipient, (v) type of document, (vi) file number? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, November 16, 2026 |
|
Q-1434
|
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
With regard to artificial intelligence-utilizing facial and licence plate recognition system technology used by the relevant governmental authorities including, but not limited to, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Canada Border Services Agency, the Canadian Armed Forces and Public Safety Canada: (a) has the government, or any department or agency acting on its behalf, purchased, leased, piloted, or deployed such technology's hardware or software, and, if so, what are the specific details, including the (i) date and duration of each pilot, procurement, or contract, (ii) total dollar value of each contract or agreement, (iii) specific federal departments, agencies, or divisions involved, (iv) geographic locations or jurisdictions where the cameras or software were deployed or tested, (v) summary of the terms of agreement, (vi) number of locations of deployment; (b) is the government currently conducting, or planning to conduct, feasibility studies, considerations, risk assessments, or policy reviews regarding the procurement or operational use of (i) facial recognition technology, (ii) Flock Safety camera networks, (iii) real-time artificial intelligence vehicle tracking, and, if so, what are the details of each; (c) has any privacy impact assessment or preliminary privacy evaluation been conducted regarding the potential or active deployment of Flock Safety technology or facial recognition systems, and, if so, what are the details, including who conducted the assessment or evaluation and what were the results? |
Awaiting response |
Friday, November 6, 2026 |
|
Q-1211
|
Thursday, May 21, 2026 |
With regard to the 2026 Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development's finding that the Public Health Agency of Canada secured 870,000 doses of human avian influenza vaccines but that over 95% of the doses were not used before expiring in February 2026, and that an additional 370,000 doses were purchased in March 2025 without a cost-benefit analysis: (a) what are the details of this procurement and inventory management, including (i) the total cost of the 870,000 doses, (ii) the cost per dose, (iii) the name of the supplier, (iv) the total value, date, and number of doses covered by each contract, agreement, amendment, option, or purchase order, (v) the title and name of the person who approved the June 2024 intention to acquire 800,000 doses, (vi) the title and name of the person who approved the March 2025 purchase of an additional 370,000 doses, (vii) the number of doses actually administered to individuals, (viii) the number of doses distributed to each province and territory, (ix) the number of doses donated to the research community, (x) the total cost of storing, handling, transporting, donating, destroying, or otherwise disposing of unused or expired doses, (xi) whether the Minister of Health or the minister's office was advised that most of the inventory could expire unused, and, if so, the date on which the minister or the minister's office was advised; (b) why was the first provincial and territorial order window opened 10 weeks after the first doses had been delivered into the federally-owned, supplier-managed warehouse; and (c) has the government sought or received any refund, credit, rebate, or other compensation for expired or unused doses, and, if so, what are the details, including the types and amounts of compensation? |
Answered |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1210
|
Thursday, May 21, 2026 |
With regard to Public Safety Canada's flood risk awareness portal and the Federally Identified Flood Risk Areas initiative, as examined in the 2026 Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development entitled “Flood Hazard Mapping”: (a) what are the details of the initiative, including (i) the total amount spent, committed, or authorized to date, (ii) the name of the private-sector vendor whose proprietary model was procured; (b) what are the details of all contracts or financial agreements signed in relation to the initiative or development of the portal, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) value, (iii) duration, (iv) description of the goods or services provided, (v) vendor, (vi) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid); (c) who approved the procurement of a proprietary model instead of an open-source or government-controlled model; (d) what intellectual property, data, inputs, outputs, assumptions, methodologies, source code, documentation, or other information is owned or controlled by the vendor, and what restrictions prevent the department from updating, adjusting, validating, publishing, or disclosing the model or its results; (e) who approved proceeding with flood risk ratings that did not incorporate climate change considerations; and (f) does the government plan to make the full portal, including all data, live at any point, and, if so, when? |
Answered |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1181
|
Friday, May 1, 2026 |
With regard to the Prime Minister's trip to India in February and March of 2026: (a) what was the total amount spent on hotel accommodations during the trip by the Canadian delegation, broken down by city the hotel was located in; (b) in each city, what was the number of hotel rooms booked, broken down by how many nights; and (c) in each city, what were the room rates paid, how many rooms were booked at each rate, and how many nights were stayed at each room rate? |
Answered |
Wednesday, June 17, 2026 |
|
Q-1136
|
Monday, April 27, 2026 |
With regard to revenue received from Canada Pension Plan payroll deductions in the time period between the creation of the Canada Pension Plan in 1966 to when the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board was formed in 1998: (a) what is the breakdown of the (i) amount, (ii) percentage, received during that period by province or territory; and (b) how does the government take the amounts and percentages paid between 1966 and 1998 into consideration when making calculations using the formula set out in subsection 113(2) of the Canada Pension Plan Act, which requires that the transfer amount be calculated based on provincial contributions and net investment income, less benefits not payable and administrative costs? |
Answered |
Friday, June 12, 2026 |
|
Q-904
|
Tuesday, February 24, 2026 |
With regard to the Canada Pension Plan: (a) what is the current total value of the funds in the plan; and (b) using the formula set out in subsection 113(2) of the Canada Pension Plan Act, which requires that the transfer amount be calculated based on provincial contributions and net investment income, less benefits not payable and administrative costs, what are the government's calculations respecting (i) the percentage share attributable to each province and territory, (ii) the corresponding dollar value of each province's and territory's share, as of the most recent data available? |
Answered |
Monday, April 13, 2026 |
|
Q-842
|
Friday, February 6, 2026 |
With regard to the Canada Infrastructure Bank since January 1, 2018: (a) what is the total number of project applications received by the Canada Infrastructure Bank, broken down by year; (b) for each application referenced in (a), what was the (i) project name and description, (ii) province or territory, (iii) sector, (iv) estimated project value at the time of the application, (v) date of the initial application submission, (vi) date of the final funding decision, (vii) current status of the project; (c) what is the average and median length of time, in days, between (i) application submission and initial review, (ii) initial review and conditional approval, (iii) conditional approval and final financial close, broken down by year; (d) how many applications experienced delays exceeding (i) six months, (ii) one year, (iii) two years, beyond the timelines originally communicated to applicants, broken down by year and sector; (e) what were the primary reasons for the delays identified in (d), including, but not limited to, internal review processes, changes in project requirements, financing negotiations, regulatory issues, or federal policy changes; (f) for projects that experienced delays, what was the cumulative increase in estimated project costs attributable to inflation, supply chain disruptions, labour cost increases, or other economic factors occurring after the original project cost estimates were submitted; (g) what mechanisms, if any, does the Bank have in place to compensate or adjust funding arrangements for applicants facing increased project costs resulting from Canada Infrastructure Bank-related delays; (h) how many applicants have formally requested compensation, funding adjustments, or renegotiation of financial terms due to cost increases associated with delays, and, for each request, what was the outcome, broken down by year; (i) what is the total additional funding approved by the Canada Infrastructure Bank to account for cost increases stemming from delayed approvals, broken down by type of funding, year and project sector; and (j) if no adjustment mechanisms exist, why not, and what steps, if any, is the government taking to address the financial impacts of Canada Infrastructure Bank delays on project proponents? |
Answered |
Wednesday, March 25, 2026 |
