House of Commons Procedure and Practice

Second Edition, 2009

House of Commons Procedure and Practice - 10. The Daily Program - Adjournment Proceedings

 

The final category of business conducted on a sitting day is the Adjournment Proceedings. This period enables Members to seek further information from the government on questions raised in Question Period.[408]

At the start of this maximum 30-minute period, from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, a motion to adjourn the House is deemed to have been moved and seconded.[409] No more than three brief exchanges are allowed on predetermined topics.[410] Each of these topics may be debated for at most 10 minutes of the 30-minute period set aside for Adjournment Proceedings.[411] No later than 5:00 p.m., the Speaker must tell the House which matter or matters are to be raised that day.[412] At the outset of each 10-minute period, the Member raising the matter and the Minister or Parliamentary Secretary replying may each speak for not more than four minutes. Each may then make a subsequent one-minute intervention.[413]

Points of order and questions of privilege may not be raised during this period, although the Speaker may read any messages from the Senate.[414] After 30 minutes or on completion of debate, whichever comes first, the motion to adjourn is deemed to have been adopted, and the House is adjourned to the next sitting day.[415] If a Member scheduled to raise a question during Adjournment Proceedings fails to appear, the adjournment notice shall be deemed withdrawn and the Member loses the opportunity to raise the question.[416] On Fridays and on days where there are no questions scheduled for debate during the Adjournment Proceedings, the Speaker adjourns the House at the conclusion of the sitting.

*   Historical Perspective

In a review of the Standing Orders in 1964, the House adopted a procedure committee proposal for the first‑ever Standing Order to regulate Question Period. At the same time, the House agreed to the committee’s suggestion that a rule on the Adjournment Proceedings be adopted to complement the Question Period Standing Order. The committee proposed a procedure whereby Members who felt dissatisfied with an answer given by the government to their question during Question Period could give notice that they wished to speak further on the subject matter of the question during the Adjournment Proceedings.[417]

In addition, since 1991, any Member concerned that a written question he or she submitted for the Order Paper has remained unanswered after 45 calendar days may give notice of his or her intention to transfer the question to the Adjournment Proceedings.[418] The question is then removed from the Order Paper and the Member’s name is placed on a list along with the names of other Members who have given notice of their intention to proceed in the Adjournment Proceedings.

Since 2001, Members are no longer required to speak from their assigned seat during the Adjournment Proceedings.[419] The four‑minute time limit for the initial response from a Minister or a Parliamentary Secretary and the one‑minute right of reply date from the same period.[420]

Despite the requirement for the Speaker to inform the House by 5:00 p.m. of the order in which questions are to be raised that day during the Adjournment Proceedings, Members raising questions would sometimes fail to appear for the adjournment debate.[421] In September 2003, in order to discourage this practice, the House adopted a new Standing Order, stipulating that Members who failed to appear to raise their question during the time provided for the Adjournment Proceedings would not have their question taken up and the notice would be deemed withdrawn.[422]

*   Suspension or Delay of the Adjournment Proceedings

Occasionally, the Adjournment Proceedings are suspended because of other House orders specifying the completion or continuation of other business on a given sitting day. Adjournment Proceedings are suspended primarily when the sitting has been extended for an emergency debate,[423] a take-note debate,[424] when closure has been moved on an item,[425] during proceedings for the election of the Speaker,[426] and on the day designated for the presentation of the budget.[427] When the House adopts a motion to adjourn early, Adjournment Proceedings do not take place.

The Adjournment Proceedings may be delayed when a sitting is extended due to a ministerial statement,[428] a question period on a time allocation motion,[429] the resumption of debate on concurrence in a committee report,[430] when Private Members’ Business has been extended on the second sitting day set aside for the consideration of the report and third reading stages of a bill,[431] and when a recorded division is deferred to the conclusion of Oral Questions.[432] The Adjournment Proceedings may also be delayed on the last allotted day in the supply periods ending December 10, March 26 and June 23.[433]

If a motion has been adopted to extend the hours of sitting during the last 10 sitting days in June, the Adjournment Proceedings are delayed until the agreed upon hour of adjournment.[434] If a motion has been adopted to continue a sitting pursuant to Standing Order 26, the Adjournment Proceedings take place at the conclusion of the sitting.[435] On occasion, the Adjournment Proceedings have been interrupted by Royal Assent and resumed upon the return of the House from the Senate following the ceremony.[436] On other occasions, when the sitting of the House has been extended for the consideration of legislation or for a special debate, the House has opted to preserve the adjournment debate at its normal time; after the Adjournment Proceedings have concluded, instead of being automatically adopted, the motion to adjourn the House has been deemed withdrawn.[437] The same applies to the provision that the Adjournment Proceedings must have been held before the House resolves into Committee of the Whole to consider the estimates designated by the Leader of the Opposition.[438]



[408] For further information, see Chapter 11, “Questions”.

[409] Standing Order 38(1). Since the Adjournment Proceedings are customarily held at the conclusion of the sitting day, this segment of the day is informally known as the “late show”.

[410] In 2001, Mauril Bélanger (Ottawa–Vanier) rose on a question of privilege in response to a Speaker’s ruling preventing him from asking a representative of the Board of Internal Economy a question during Adjournment Proceedings. He was told that this was because, under the Standing Orders, only Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries may answer questions raised during this item in the daily program. A few days later, following consultations with the House Leaders, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Government House Leader received the unanimous consent of the House to move that Mr. Bélanger’s question be raised during Adjournment Proceedings and that a representative of the Board of Internal Economy be permitted to respond. The motion was adopted (Debates, September 28, 2001, pp. 5721-2; Journals, October 2, 2001, p. 677, Debates, p. 5883).

[411] Standing Order 38(2).

[412] Standing Order 38(4). The Standing Orders allow the Speaker to decide the order in which notices relating to questions to be debated during Adjournment Proceedings are to be raised. Standing Order 38(3) also instructs the Chair to consider “the order in which notices were given, to the urgency of the matters raised, and to the apportioning of the opportunities to debate such matters among the Members of the various parties in the House”.

[413] Standing Order 38(5).

[414] See, for example, Journals, March 23, 2005, p. 558.

[415] Standing Order 38(5).

[416] Standing Order 38(2)(b). See, for example, Debates, September 24, 2003, p. 7780; February 13, 2007, p. 6804.

[417] Standing Order 37(3). See also Journals, April 20, 1964, pp. 224‑5, Debates, p. 2342.

[418] Standing Order 39(5)(b). See Journals, April 11, 1991, pp. 2905, 2909‑10. For examples of Members requesting that written questions be transferred to the Adjournment Proceedings, see Debates, November 20, 1992, pp. 13720‑1; September 25, 1995, p. 14819.

[419] Standing Order 17. The Special Committee on the Modernization and Improvement of the Procedures of the House of Commons believed “that it would facilitate greater dialogue and exchange of views if Members were not required to be at their assigned desks in the chamber during adjournment proceedings”. See the First Report of the Special Committee on the Modernization and Improvement of the Procedures of the House of Commons, par. 19, presented to the House on June 1, 2001 (Journals, p. 465), and concurred in on October 4, 2001 (Journals, pp. 691-3), pursuant to an Order made on October 3, 2001 (Journals, p. 685).

[420] Journals, October 3, 2001, p. 685; October 4, 2001, pp. 691-3.

[421] Debates, April 25, 2002, pp. 10800, 10843-4.

[422] Standing Order 38(2)(b). See the Fourth Report of the Special Committee on the Modernization and Improvement of the Procedures of the House of Commons, par. 50, presented to the House on June 12, 2003 (Journals, p. 915), and concurred in on September 18, 2003 (Journals, p. 995). For examples of Members having failed to appear to raise their question during the Adjournment Proceedings as previously scheduled, see Debates, November 3, 2004, p. 1186; March 7, 2005, p. 4072.

[423] Standing Order 52(12).

[424] Standing Order 53.1(2).

[425] There have been two exceptions to this rule: on June 20, 1995 (Journals, p. 1822), pursuant to a Special Order adopted June 12, 1995 (Journals, pp. 1639-40), and on December 9, 2002, following the deferred division, pursuant to a Special Order, on a subamendment to an item being closured (Journals, pp. 280-1, 285).

[426] Standing Order 2(3).

[427] Standing Order 83(2).

[428] Standing Order 33(2).

[429] Standing Order 67.1(2).

[430] See, for example, Journals, October 31, 2006, pp. 605-6.

[431] Standing Order 98(3) and (5).

[432] Standing Order 45(7.1).

[433] Standing Order 81(17) and (18).

[434] Standing Order 27(1). See, for example, Journals, June 9, 2005, p. 858; June 13, 2005, pp. 874-5; June 20, 2005, p. 936; June 22, 2005, p. 971; June 9, 2006, p. 259; June 21, 2006, p. 342.

[435] See, for example, Journals, May 11, 1998, pp. 772-4. However, whenever a sitting is extended pursuant to Standing Order 26, it is not always possible for those Members scheduled in the Adjournment Proceedings to be present, since the start time for that debate is unknown. See Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, Transcript of unpublished meeting, May 3, 1994, p. 12:18. An announcement by the Speaker may be made, but the Adjournment Proceedings will lapse if Members do not proceed with their questions. See, for example, Journals, March 13, 1997, pp. 1277-8, 1281, Debates, pp. 9036, 9058; Journals, October 22, 2003, p. 1155, Debates, pp. 8611, 8632.

[436] See, for example, Debates, November 6, 1990, p. 15236.

[437] See, for example, Journals, November 26, 1992, p. 2242; March 18, 1996, pp. 104, 111.

[438] Standing Order 81(4)(a). See the First Report of the Special Committee on the Modernization and Improvement of the Procedures of the House of Commons, par. 36, presented to the House on June 1, 2001 (Journals, p. 465), and concurred in on October 4, 2001 (Journals, pp. 691‑3), pursuant to an Order made on October 3, 2001 (Journals, p. 685). See also Journals, November 16, 2004, pp. 225-6; November 23, 2004, p. 253.

Top of Page