You know what we demand of you, Mr. Speaker. Perfection! We want fairness, independence, decisiveness,
patience, common sense, good humour, upholding the traditions of the House, knowledge of the rules and an
intuition for the changing mood and tone of the House as we move through our days.
John N. Turner, Leader of the Opposition
(Debates, September 30, 1986, p. 9)
T
he Speaker of the House of Commons holds a position which is not only
one of historical significance but also one of important responsibility. The incumbent of the office
performs several functions falling into three main categories. First, the Speaker presides over debate in
the House and is responsible for enforcing and interpreting all rules and practices and for the preservation
of order and decorum in the proceedings of the House. Second, the Speaker is the chief administrative
officer of the House of Commons. Third, the Speaker is the representative or spokesperson for the House in
its relations with authorities or persons outside Parliament. This chapter describes the speakership from a
general point of view and enumerates the specific powers, duties and responsibilities attached to the
office of Speaker.
The Speaker of the House
Historical Perspective
No other office or position is more closely linked to the history of the House of Commons than that of the
Speaker. The office dates back at least 600 years, almost to the very beginnings of Parliament itself.
Great Britain
The first Speaker to be so designated was Sir Thomas Hungerford in 1377. [1]
His predecessor, Sir Peter de la Mare, was elected in 1376 and was the first Commons spokesperson known to
have been selected by the House membership. [2]
Originally, the Speaker’s principal function was to act as the spokesperson of the House in its
dealings with the House of Lords and the Crown. [3]
In an era when the influence and power of the King was great and that of the House still tentative and
subordinate, the Speaker was as much an agent of royal interests (seen as “the King’s man”)
as a servant of the House. [4]
The year 1642 marked the end of the Crown’s influence over the Speaker, when Charles I, accompanied
by an armed escort, crossed the Bar of the House, sat in the Speaker’s chair and demanded the
surrender of five parliamentary leaders on a charge of treason. Falling to his knees, Speaker William
Lenthall replied with these now famous words which have since defined the Speaker’s role in relation
to the House and the Crown:
May it please Your Majesty, I have neither eyes to see, nor tongue to speak in this place, but as the House
is pleased to direct me, whose servant I am here; and I humbly beg Your Majesty’s pardon that I cannot
give any other answer than this to what Your Majesty is pleased to demand of me. [5]
While Speaker Lenthall’s words heralded the end of the Crown’s influence over the Speakership,
it was the beginning of the government’s authority over the Chair. The Speakership then became an
appointment much coveted by members of the party in power and used to advance its policies. The House
allowed Speakers, who often held government posts, to participate routinely in debate and to set the agenda
of the sitting by selecting when and what bills should be considered. However, with his advent to the Chair,
Speaker Arthur Onslow (1728-61) loosened the ties to government and established the standards of
independence and impartiality which have come to be associated with the office of Speaker. Believing that
widespread corruption in government was destroying the dignity of Parliament, he became a strict
proceduralist and impartial arbiter of the House’s proceedings. By the mid-1800s and the tenure of
Speaker Shaw-Lefevre (1839-57), the principle of Speakers abstaining from all political activity became
established. Throughout the nineteenth century and into the twentieth, the House altered its rules to
invest the Speaker with considerable authority to curtail obstruction and disorder, thereby firmly
entrenching the tradition of a non-partisan Chair.
It was also during the Speakership of Shaw-Lefevre that the principle of continuity of office began. Upon
election, the Speaker renounces all party affiliation and, when seeking re-election to the House, runs as
Speaker. No Speaker of the British House of Commons seeking re-election in his or her constituency has
been defeated; it has happened that Speakers have faced one or more opponents nominated by other parties. [6]
Upon retirement, the Speaker is appointed to the House of Lords with a pension as compensation for the
sacrifice of active partisan political life. [7]
Canada
As in the British parliamentary system, the Speaker of the Canadian House of Commons functions as its
spokesperson and as the presiding officer of its proceedings. However, the historic position and character
of the British and Canadian speakerships are distinctly different.
In Canada, the relationship between the Crown, the Senate and the House of Commons was clearly established
by the time of Confederation. The Canadian Speaker has not, therefore, been involved in constitutional
disputes relating to the role of the Speaker, as took place in Britain over a period of several centuries.
The appointment and role of the Speaker were clearly defined in the Constitution Act, 1867 and
subsequently in the Parliament of Canada Act and the Standing Orders of the House of Commons. [8]
In addition, political parties and party government have always been a part of the Canadian House. The
British Commons, on the other hand, saw the development of the system of party government over 150 years of
its history, beginning in the late seventeenth century. [9]
By the end of the nineteenth century, it had conferred on its Speaker discretionary powers to overcome
determined obstruction by minorities in the House.
In contrast to the established British practice of continuity in the Speakership, the experience in Canada
has seen the length of tenure limited normally to one or two Parliaments. [10]
The issue of the continuity of the Speakership has often been raised in the House and its committees; [11]
only two of the more than 30 Speakers since Confederation have served more than two Parliaments (i.e.,
Speaker Lemieux (1922-30) and Speaker Lamoureux (1966-74) each served in three Parliaments). [12]
The longest tenure, that of Speaker Lamoureux, lasted nine years.
The Speaker has almost always been elected from among the Members of the governing party, [13]
and although the Speaker eschews partisan political activity, he or she does not make a complete break.
Only one Speaker has chosen to sever himself from all party affiliation and to present himself as an
independent candidate in general elections. Speaker Lamoureux (1966-74) resigned from the Liberal Party
and, as an independent candidate, ran and won in the general elections of 1968 and 1972. In 1968, the
Liberal Party and the Progressive Conservative Party did not nominate candidates to oppose him; the New
Democratic Party had already nominated a candidate prior to his decision to run as an independent. In 1972,
both the New Democratic Party and the Progressive Conservative Party ran candidates against him.
Certain developments in recent years have served to strengthen and enhance the office of Speaker. In 1968,
the official Order of Precedence of Canada [14]
was amended to move the Speaker of the House of Commons from tenth position to seventh, immediately after
the Governor General, the Prime Minister, the Chief Justice of Canada, former Governors General, former
Prime Ministers and the Speaker of the Senate. [15]
Since the mid-1970s, the salary and allowances attached to the office of Speaker have been comparable to
those of a Cabinet Minister. [16]
A long-standing rule providing for appeals to the House from decisions of the Speaker was removed from the
Standing Orders in 1965. [17]
Provisional rules, adopted on June 27, 1985, and made permanent in June 1987, provide for the election of
the Speaker by secret ballot. [18]
Governing Provisions
The Constitution Act, 1867 establishes the office of Speaker, the requirement for the election of
the Speaker, certain of the Speaker’s duties and the right of the Speaker to vote only in case of
a tie, referred to as a “casting vote”. [19]
The Parliament of Canada Act fixes the Speaker’s salary and enumerates certain
administrative responsibilities such as chairing the Board of Internal Economy, the body which is by
statute responsible for all matters of financial and administrative policy affecting the House of Commons. [20]
The Act also provides for the Deputy Speaker, or any other Member called upon by the Speaker, to preside
over the House during the Speaker’s absence. [21]
The Parliament of Canada Act further provides that following a dissolution of Parliament, the
Speaker and the other members of the Board of Internal Economy will remain in office, for administrative
purposes, until the opening of the new Parliament. [22]
A number of other statutes have an impact on the role and responsibilities of the Speaker of the House. For
example, the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act establishes the Speaker’s role in
appointing two members to each provincial Electoral Boundaries Commission, [23]
in tabling the reports of these commissions and in the filing of possible objections. [24]
The Official Languages Act provides that in the event of the absence or incapacity of the
Commissioner of Official Languages, the Governor in Council may appoint a replacement, following
consultation by the Prime Minister with the Speakers of both Houses. [25]
Certain statutes require the Speaker to receive reports and other documents and to table them in the
House. [26]
Other statutes, such as the Western Grain Transportation Act, the Emergencies Act, the
Energy Administration Act, the Energy Supplies Emergency Act, the Old Age Security
Act, the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act and the
Special Economic Measures Act, which provide for Parliament to confirm, revoke or amend instruments
of delegated legislation by means of resolutions adopted after debate in the House, also require the
Speaker to perform a specific role in this process. [27]
The Standing Orders provide for the Speaker’s duties as presiding officer in the House, and
outline further administrative duties, most of which are carried out by the Clerk and the
Sergeant-at-Arms under the direction of the Speaker. [28]
Procedural Role of the Speaker
The House devises its own rules, develops its own practices and is master of its own proceedings. The office
of the Speaker derives its authority from the House and the holder of the office can accurately be
described as its representative and authoritative counsellor in all matters of form and procedure. [29]
The office of the Speaker is to be distinguished from its incumbent, who requires the support and goodwill
of the House in order to carry out the duties of the office. The Speaker’s authority and
responsibilities as Presiding Officer in the House of Commons flow in large part from the Constitution and
from the written rules of the House.
The duties of the Speaker of the House of Commons require balancing the rights and interests of the majority
and minority in the House to ensure that the public business is efficiently transacted and that the
interests of all parts of the House are advocated and protected against the use of arbitrary authority. [30]
It is in this spirit that the Speaker, as the chief servant of the House, applies the rules. The Speaker
is the servant, not of any part of the House or any majority in the House, but of the entire institution
and the best interests of the House as distilled over many generations in its practices.
Despite the considerable authority the Speaker holds, he or she may exercise only those powers conferred by
the House, within the limits established by the House itself. In ruling on matters of procedure, the Speaker
adheres strictly to this principle, delineating the extent of the Speaker’s authority and in some
cases offering a suggestion as to matters which the House may see fit to pursue. [31]
Guardian of Rights and Privileges
It is the responsibility of the Speaker to act as the guardian of the rights and privileges of Members
and of the House as an institution. [32]
At the opening of each Parliament, the House is summoned to the Senate Chamber and the newly elected
Speaker addresses the Crown or its representative and claims for the Commons all its rights and privileges. [33]
The claim holds good for the life of the Parliament and is not repeated in the event of a new Speaker being
elected during the course of a Parliament. [34]
Freedom of speech may be the most important of the privileges accorded to Members of Parliament; it has
been described as:
… a fundamental right without which they would be hampered in the performance of their duties.
It permits them to speak in the House without inhibition, to refer to any matter or express any opinion as
they see fit, to say what they feel needs to be said in the furtherance of the national interest and the
aspirations of their constituents. [35]
The right to freedom of speech is not absolute; there are restrictions, derived from practice, convention,
and the rules agreed to by the House. For example, the Standing Orders provide for time limits on speeches,
and according to the sub judice convention, it is accepted that Members will restrict themselves
from discussion of matters which are under the consideration of a judge or court. [36]
The duty of the Speaker is to ensure that the right of Members to free speech is protected and exercised to
the fullest possible extent; this is accomplished in part by ensuring that the rules and practices of the
House are applied and that order and decorum are maintained. [37]
Whenever a Member brings to the attention of the House a possible breach of a right or privilege, the
responsibility of the Speaker is to determine whether or not prima facie a breach of privilege
has occurred. [38]
In practice the Speaker, in hearing an alleged question of privilege, may intervene to remind Members of
the Speaker’s role and to request that the Member’s remarks be directed to providing facts to
establish the existence of a prima facie case. [39]
At the Speaker’s discretion, other Members may be permitted to participate. Only when the Speaker has
ruled the matter to be a prima facie question of privilege is it before the House for its
consideration. [40]
Order and Decorum
As the arbiter of House proceedings, the Speaker’s duty is to preserve order and decorum in the House
and to decide any matters of procedure that may arise. When a decision on a matter of procedure or a
question of order is reached, the Standing Orders provide that the Speaker identify which Standing Order or
authority is being applied to the case. [41]
Sometimes, a ruling is given quickly and with a minimum of explanation. [42]
At other times, circumstances do not permit an immediate ruling. The Speaker may allow discussion of the
point of order before he or she comes to a decision. [43]
The Speaker might also reserve on a matter, returning to the House at a later time to deliver the ruling. [44]
Once the Speaker has ruled, the matter is no longer open to debate or discussion. On some occasions, the
Speaker has chosen to amend or clarify a previous ruling. [45]
The duty to maintain order and decorum in the House [46]
confers on the Speaker a wide-ranging authority extending to such matters as Members’ attire and
behaviour in the Chamber, the conduct of House proceedings, the rules of debate, and disruptions on the
floor of the House and in the galleries. There are a number of ways in which the Speaker ensures that order
and decorum are preserved:
- The rules governing the conduct of debate empower the Speaker to call a Member to order if the
Member persists in repeating an argument already made in the course of debate, or in addressing a subject
which is not relevant to the question before the House. [47]
The Speaker may intervene directly to address an individual Member or the House in general; [48]
or, the Speaker may respond to a point of order raised by another Member. [49]
The Speaker can call to order any Member whose conduct is disruptive to the order of the House. For
example, if it is a question of unparliamentary language, the Speaker requests an unequivocal withdrawal
of the word or expression. [50]
- If the Speaker has found it necessary to intervene in order to call a Member to order, he or she may
then choose to recognize another Member, thus declining to give the floor back to the offending Member. [51]
On occasion, a Member who is called to order by the Speaker may not immediately comply with the Speaker’s
instructions; in such a case, the Speaker has given the Member time to reflect on his or her position and
upon the duty of the Chair, exercising in the meantime the prerogative of the Chair not to “see”
the Member if he or she should rise to be recognized. [52]
- The strongest sanction available to the Speaker for maintaining order in the House is “naming”,
a disciplinary measure invoked against a Member who persistently disregards the authority of the Chair. [53]
If a Member refuses to heed the Speaker’s requests to bring his or her behaviour into line with
the rules and practices of the House, the Speaker has the authority to name that Member (i.e., address the
Member by name rather than by constituency or title, as is the usual practice) and, without putting the
question to the House, order his or her withdrawal from the Chamber for the remainder of the sitting day. [54]
During debate in a Committee of the Whole House, if a Member persists in disorderly conduct and refuses to
obey the warning of the Chair to discontinue his or her unparliamentary behaviour, the Chair of the
Committee rises and reports the conduct of the Member to the Speaker. The Chair may do this on his or her
own initiative without recourse to a motion from the Committee. [55]
The Speaker will then follow the procedure for naming the Member. [56]
The power to name a Member extends to the Deputy Speaker and Acting Speaker. [57]
- Another means of preserving order in the Chamber is the Speaker’s discretionary power to order
the withdrawal of strangers: [58]
that is, anyone who is not a Member or an official of the House of Commons (e.g., Senators, diplomats,
government officials, journalists or members of the general public). This has been used to clear the
galleries of individuals whose presence has been a cause of disruption. [59]
From time to time, the Speaker has also seen fit to remind spectators in the galleries of the expected
standard of behaviour. [60]
In addition, the rules provide that, should a Member take note of the presence of strangers (or should
the House wish to proceed in camera [61]),
the Speaker may put the question “That strangers be ordered to withdraw”. [62]
This motion is not debatable or amendable, and if decided in the affirmative, the Speaker — with the
help of the Sergeant-at-Arms, if necessary — then ensures that the galleries are cleared. [63]
No Appeals
The present Standing Orders prohibit any debate on decisions of the Speaker and prohibit any appeal of a
decision to the House. [64]
From Confederation until 1965, however, it was possible for any Member who disagreed with a Speaker’s
decision on a question of order to appeal it immediately to the House (i.e., to move a non-debatable motion
on the question of whether or not the House upheld the Speaker’s ruling). [65]
In the early years of Confederation, this was rarely done. [66]
After the turn of the century, however, Members began asserting their right to an appeal to the House. [67]
By the 1920s and thereafter, hardly a session passed that did not see at least one appeal. [68]
The practice reached a peak in the session of 1956 when 11 appeals were made, mostly during the very
contentious “Pipeline Debate”. [69]
Similar numbers of appeals were made in the Parliaments of 1962-63 and 1963-65. [70]
In 1965, as part of a series of amendments to the Standing Orders, the opportunity to appeal rulings of
the Speaker was abolished. [71]
Former Speaker Lambert supported the abolition of appeals because “one of the chief difficulties with
the business of Parliament over the past 10 years has been the somewhat indiscriminate use of appeals
against Speaker’s rulings, not on points of jurisprudence or points of procedure but for political
effect”. [72]
Before 1965, there were several instances where the decision of the Speaker was appealed and not sustained
by the House. The first of these came in 1873 when the House overruled the Speaker on the acceptability of
a petition. [73]
In 1926, another ruling was rejected, and three more in 1963 were not sustained. [74]
The vote on a fourth ruling in 1963 resulted in a tie and was sustained when the Speaker declined to give a
casting vote and ruled that his decision should stand “since the decision has not been negatived”. [75]
Impartiality of the Chair
When in the Chair, the Speaker embodies the power and authority of the office, strengthened by rule and
precedent. He or she must at all times show, and be seen to show, the impartiality required to sustain the
trust and goodwill of the House. The actions of the Speaker are not to be criticized in debate or by any
means except by way of a substantive motion. Such motions have been moved against the Speaker [76]
or other presiding officers [77]
on rare occasions. Reflections on the character or actions of the Speaker — an allegation of bias, for
example — could be taken by the House as breaches of privilege and punished accordingly.
On two occasions, newspaper editorials were found to contain libellous reflections on the Speaker and were
declared by the House, in one instance, to be a contempt of its privileges [78]
and, in the other, a gross breach of its privileges. [79]
In 1981, a Minister complained that remarks directed to the Speaker by the Leader of the Opposition
constituted an attack on the authority and impartiality of the Speaker. The following day, the Minister
tabled a motion in the House calling for the remarks to be referred to the Standing Committee on
Privileges and Elections. However, the Leader of the Opposition withdrew his remarks and the matter was
taken no further. [80]
In another incident, occurring in 1993, a question of privilege was raised concerning disparaging remarks
made by a Member about the impartiality of the Assistant Deputy Chairman of Committees of the Whole. When
the Member refused to withdraw the comments, the Speaker stated that the comments “affect[ed] the
dignity of [the] House” and were “an attack against the integrity” of an officer of the
House. He ruled that prima facie there was a case of privilege and the matter was referred to a
Committee. Two days later, the Member rose in the House and withdrew the remarks. [81]
In 1996, a private Member’s motion on the Order Paper alleged that another Member and his
party were guilty of a contempt of the House for attempting to rally public opinion with a view to
influencing an upcoming decision of the Speaker. The motion was selected for debate in the House but was
later withdrawn without having been considered. [82]
In 1998, a Member raised a question of privilege, alleging that statements attributed to other Members in a
newspaper article (concerning an upcoming ruling of the Chair) constituted an attempt to intimidate the
Speaker and the House itself. The Speaker found a prima facie case and the matter was referred to a
committee, which investigated and concluded that the statements attributed to the Members “were not
intended to be contemptuous of the House of Commons or the Speaker” and that “they did not
bring into question the integrity of the House of Commons and its servant, the Speaker”. [83]
In order to protect the impartiality of the office, the Speaker abstains from all partisan political
activity (for example, by not attending caucus meetings), does not participate in debate and will vote only
in the case of an equality of voices, normally referred to as the “casting vote” of the Chair. [84]
Since 1979, the Speaker, unlike all other Members, has not had an assigned desk in the Chamber; this is a
further indication that it has become an accepted practice that the Speaker has no role whatsoever in
debate, whether in the House or in a Committee of the Whole. [85]
Although the requirement that Speakers remain mute in debate has existed since 1867, it has not always been
applied when the House met in a Committee of the Whole. During the first 60 years after Confederation, there
were many instances of participation by the Speaker in this forum. [86]
By 1927, however, the practice had become rare, and when Speaker Lemieux spoke in Committee, Members
objected. [87]
After this, Speakers did not intervene in a Committee of the Whole except on occasion to defend their
Estimates. [88]
Since 1968, these Estimates have been referred to standing committees for study and the Speaker, as a
witness, continues to defend the Estimates of the House of Commons in this forum. [89]
In the past, Speakers have appeared before, and have sometimes chaired, House committees, usually when
matters of procedure and reform of the rules have been considered. [90]
In recent years, however, Speakers have limited themselves to appearing before standing committees as
witnesses on matters within their jurisdiction, such as the spending Estimates of the House.
Casting Vote
The Speaker does not participate in debate and votes only in cases of an equality of voices; in such an
eventuality, the Speaker is responsible for breaking the tie by casting a vote. [91]
In theory, the Speaker has the same freedom as any other Member to vote in accordance with his or her
conscience; however, the exercise of this responsibility could involve the Speaker in partisan debate, which
would adversely affect the confidence of the House in the Speaker’s impartiality. Therefore, certain
conventions have developed as a guide to Speakers (and Chairmen in a Committee of the Whole) in the
infrequent exercise of the casting vote. [92]
Concisely put, the Speaker would normally vote to maintain the status quo. This entails voting in
the following fashion:
- whenever possible, leaving the matter open for future consideration and allowing for further discussion
by the House;
- whenever no further discussion is possible, taking into account that the matter could somehow be
brought back in the future and be decided by a majority of the House;
- leaving a bill in its existing form rather than having it amended. [93]
In 1863, these conventions were acknowledged in the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada when the
Speaker was called upon to give a casting vote, and gave as his reason “that in the case of an equal
division, the practice was, that the Speaker should keep the question as long as possible before the House
in order to afford a further opportunity to the House of expressing an opinion upon it”. [94]
The application of this convention has not always been consistent and there are very few examples where
Speakers or Chairmen of Committees of the Whole gave reasons when casting a vote. For instance, on one
occasion, the Speaker voted in favour of a hoist amendment [95]
to the motion for third reading of a bill in order “to keep the Bill before the House”; [96]
on another, the Speaker voted against a hoist amendment for the same reason (“to give the House a
further opportunity for consideration”). [97]
The manner in which the Speaker casts a deciding vote is as follows: typically, a recorded vote is demanded,
taken and, when an equality of voices is discerned at the announcement of the result, the Speaker then
votes and may give reasons. Any given reasons are recorded in the Journals. On one occasion, an
equality of voices was announced, the Speaker cast his vote and it later came to light that no tie had
occurred. The next day, the Speaker made a brief statement and declared his vote invalidated. [98]
On another occasion, prior to the abolition of appeals from Speakers’ rulings, the voices were equal
on the motion to sustain the ruling of the Chair. The Speaker declined to vote, stating that “Since
the decision has not been negatived, I declare my ruling sustained” and no objection was raised. [99]
Specific Duties
Specific duties of the Speaker in the Chamber are described below; many of the procedural topics referred to
are explored in greater detail in other chapters.
- Opening the sitting:
- It is the Speaker’s responsibility to open the sittings of the House once it has been determined
that a quorum is present. [100]
When opening a sitting, the Speaker takes the Chair, calls the House to order, reads prayers, directs that
the doors to the public galleries be opened, and then calls the first item of business. If, as sometimes
happens, the Speaker is absent at the opening of a sitting, the House is so informed by the Clerk and the
Deputy Speaker takes the Chair. [101]
- Reading motions, putting questions, announcing results of votes:
- Before debate begins on a matter, the Speaker proposes the question by reading the motion on which the House is to decide. When
no Member rises to be recognized in debate, the Speaker asks if the House is “ready for the question”,
thus ascertaining whether or not the debate has concluded. When debate on a question is closed, it is the
Speaker’s responsibility to put the question, that is, to put the matter for a decision of the House,
and afterwards to announce the result to the House. [102]
- Recognizing Members to speak in the House:
- No Member may speak in the House until called or recognized by the Speaker; any Member so recognized may speak during debate,
questions and comments periods, Question Period, and other proceedings of the House. Various conventions and
informal arrangements exist to ensure the participation of all parties in debate; nevertheless, the
decision as to who may speak is ultimately the Speaker’s. [103]
- Deciding questions of order and questions of privilege:
- In presiding over the deliberations of the House, the Speaker is responsible for deciding questions of order and questions of
privilege, and for ensuring that the rules and practices of the House are respected. [104]
The Speaker rules on questions of order and questions of privilege as they occur and not in anticipation. [105]
A question of order may be brought to the Speaker’s attention by a Member, or the Speaker may
intervene when he or she observes an irregularity. [106]
In ruling on questions of order and questions of privilege, the Speaker cites the Standing Order or other
applicable authority. [107]
At times, the Speaker may be called upon to deal with situations not provided for in the Standing Orders
of the House; in such cases, the rules give authority to the Speaker to consider parliamentary tradition in
jurisdictions outside the House of Commons of Canada. [108]
- Decisions on motions:
- The Standing Orders confer on the Speaker certain responsibilities in connection with motions coming before the House for
consideration. The Speaker has the responsibility to act, in the event that he or she judges a motion to be
“contrary to the rules and privileges of Parliament”. [109]
In such a case, it is the Speaker’s responsibility to inform the House at the earliest opportunity,
before the question is put, and to refer to the applicable rule or authority. This is to be distinguished
from the Speaker’s general power to rule authoritatively on matters of procedure. While the Speaker
is guardian of the rules and privileges of the House, he or she is its servant as well; the Members of the
House retain control of their collective actions. Thus, if the Speaker were to inform the House that a
proposed motion, though correct as to its form, runs counter to established parliamentary principles,
customs or privileges, the House would then be in a position to take a decision on the matter, with the
benefit of the information provided and the authorities cited by the Speaker. This rule was first adopted
after Confederation [110]
and has never been invoked by the Speaker, although there have been attempts to persuade the Chair to
invoke it. [111]
Other rules of the House give the Speaker the power to select which report stage amendments will be
considered by the House, and to group these for purposes of debate and division. [112]
In addition, in the event that notice of more than one opposition motion is given when a Supply day has
been designated, the Speaker is responsible for selecting the one which will have precedence for
consideration by the House. [113]
- Conduct of Private Members’ Business:
- It is the overall responsibility of the Speaker to make all the necessary arrangements to ensure the orderly conduct of the
hour of each sitting day devoted to Private Members’ Business. [114]
This includes ensuring that the House has 24 hours’ notice of the item to be considered in each
sitting, [115]
seeing to the arrangement of exchanges when a sponsoring Member is unable to be present when his or her
item is scheduled for consideration, [116]
and refusing a notice of an item of Private Members’ Business which is deemed to be substantially
the same as another. [117]
- Private bills:
- When private bills [118]
are to be brought before Parliament, those wishing to act as parliamentary agents (i.e., employed in
promoting or opposing a private bill) must be granted authority to do so by the Speaker. [119]
The Speaker also has the power to issue a temporary or absolute prohibition on an individual acting as a
parliamentary agent, in cases where he or she has failed to act in accordance with parliamentary rules
and practice. [120]
- Tabling of documents:
- Statutory provisions, as well as rules of the House, state that the Speaker receives and tables certain reports and documents
in the House. When the Speaker tables a document, he or she may do so during the sitting; [121]
alternatively, the document may be deposited with the Clerk of the House. [122]
In either case, the tabling is noted in the Journals and the item tabled is deemed permanently
referred to the appropriate standing committee. [123]
The specific documents tabled by the Speaker are as follows:
- As Chair of the Board of Internal Economy (the body responsible for all financial and administrative
matters affecting the House of Commons) the Speaker is responsible for tabling reports of the Board’s
proceedings. [124]
The reports consist of minutes of the Board’s meetings, which are tabled as they are approved by the
Board. [125]
The Speaker is also responsible for tabling the annual reports of the Board’s decisions respecting
the budgets of parliamentary committees. [126]
In addition, the Parliament of Canada Act requires the Speaker to table any by-laws made by the
Board within 30 days of their making; typically, these are deposited with the Clerk. [127]
- Statutory requirements exist whereby designated officers of Parliament [128]
and the Canadian Human Rights Commission transmit their annual reports and any special or investigatory
reports to the Speaker, who then tables them in the House. [129]
- In the decennial process to readjust electoral boundaries, reports of the provincial and territorial
electoral boundaries commissions are transmitted by the Chief Electoral Officer to the Speaker, who tables
them when the House is sitting. [130]
- When election results are contested under the Dominion Controverted Elections Act, reports are
made to the Speaker, who then informs the House; typically, this is done at or shortly after the opening of
the sitting. [131]
The legislation also requires the Speaker to inform the House of amendments to the rules of the provincial
Supreme Courts, which are the courts of appeal in such cases. [132]
In accordance with the Corrupt Practices Inquiries Act (which provides for investigation of
alleged or suspected corrupt or illegal practices during elections), commissions of enquiry are appointed
and their reports are made to Parliament — that is, to the Speakers of both Houses — and it
would be the Speaker’s responsibility to inform the House of the reports. [133]
- Emergency debates:
- When a Member has made a request to move the adjournment of the House in order to debate a matter requiring urgent consideration
(an emergency debate), the Speaker is responsible for deciding whether or not the request will be granted. [134]
When the Speaker has granted an application for an emergency debate, the rules provide for it to take place
the same day, but the Speaker may also exercise a discretionary power to defer the debate to a specific
time on the next sitting day. [135]
An emergency debate ends at the times provided in the Standing Orders, but again, the Speaker has
discretion to declare the motion carried and adjourn the House to the next sitting day if, in his or her
opinion, debate has concluded before those times. [136]
Once it is underway, an emergency debate takes precedence over all other business; in the event of conflict
or incompatibility with regard to other rules or other business of the House, the Speaker has complete
discretion in reconciling the difficulty. [137]
- Recall of the House:
- When the House stands adjourned during a session, the Speaker has the power to recall the House to meet prior to the date it is
scheduled to reconvene. [138]
The request to recall the House is always initiated by a Minister (usually the Government House Leader),
and the Speaker has no authority to consider such a request from any other Member. In these circumstances
(or while Parliament stands prorogued, or prior to the first session of a new Parliament), upon receipt of
a written request from the government, the Speaker will cause to be published a Special Order Paper
which informs the House of any measure the government wishes the House to consider immediately. [139]
A notice for recall of the House is not usually withdrawn; but on one occasion, after receiving a request
from all the recognized parties in the House, the Speaker issued a formal statement cancelling an earlier
notice for recall. [140]
- Parliamentary publications:
- The official publications of the House of Commons are published under the authority of the Speaker. These include, among others,
the Journals, the Debates, the indexes to the Journals and Debates,
the Order Paper and Notice Paper, the Standing Orders of the House of Commons, bills and the
minutes and reports of parliamentary committees. [141]
- Chairs of Legislative Committees:
- The Speaker also has responsibilities with regard to Chairs of legislative committees. [142]
It is the Speaker’s duty at the start of each session, and thereafter as necessary, to select Members
to form a Panel of Chairmen. The Speaker exercises a certain amount of discretion in the choice of Members;
the rules specify only that a proportionate number of Members be appointed from the government and
opposition parties and that the other Presiding Officers of the House be members of the Panel. [143]
Whenever the House agrees to proceed with the appointment of a legislative committee, it is the Speaker’s
responsibility to select from the Panel of Chairmen a Member to chair that legislative committee. [144]
Administrative Role of the Speaker
The Speaker is the head of the House of Commons administration and is responsible for its overall direction
and management. [145]
The House administration supports Members of Parliament, individually and collectively, in their
parliamentary roles as well as the House itself as an institution.
One of the fundamental privileges of the House is to regulate its own internal affairs, holding exclusive
jurisdiction over its premises and the people within. [146]
By virtue of theParliament of Canada Act, all matters of administrative and financial policy
affecting the House of Commons are overseen by the Board of Internal Economy, [147]
which is composed of Members of the House from the government and opposition parties. The Speaker chairs
the Board of Internal Economy.
The day-to-day management of the staff of the House of Commons rests with the Clerk [148]
and the senior officials reporting to the Clerk, subject to orders of the House or of the Speaker. [149]
The Speaker, as Chair of the Board of Internal Economy and senior authority in matters of House management,
retains a major interest in issues of human resources management.
Spending Estimates [150]
for the House of Commons are prepared at the request of the Board of Internal Economy and once they have
been approved by the Board, it is the Speaker’s responsibility to transmit them to the President of
the Treasury Board for tabling with the government’s departmental Estimates for the fiscal year.
The Speaker also chairs the Executive Committee, which is established by the Board of Internal Economy. The
Executive Committee is responsible for management policy and major decision-making affecting general
administrative practices, security, and financial and human resources administration. [151]
The right of each House of Parliament to regulate its own internal affairs also extends to the management of
the premises “within the precincts and beyond thedebating Chamber …”. [152]
As guardian of the rights and privilege of the House, the Speaker ensures that they are respected within
and outside the House. [153]
Within the precincts, the Speaker oversees matters of security and policing. Security within the buildings
occupied by Members and staff of the House is the responsibility of the Sergeant-at-Arms, who acts under
the Speaker’s authority. [154]
For this purpose, the House maintains its own security service. Arrangements are in place whereby the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) is charged with
security of the grounds outside the buildings. There are occasions when the House security staff request
and receive assistance from outside police forces, whether the RCMP
or the local police. It is also well established that outside police forces wishing to enter the
parliamentary precincts must first have permission from the Speaker to do so, and that the authority to
grant or withhold permission rests with the Speaker, who exercises sole discretion in this regard. [155]
The Speaker as the chief administrator of the House oversees all its dealings with government departments in
matters of administration. Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) is the primary provider of
central and common services to the Government of Canada and to the Parliament of Canada. Officials of the
House of Commons, under the Speaker’s authority, work in close co-operation with PWGSC for the
delivery of professional and technical services such as translation and interpretation, printing and
publishing, as well as the management of the Parliament Buildings and leased properties. The National
Capital Commission (NCC) is a Crown corporation whose objective is to plan and assist in “the
development, conservation and improvement of the National Capital Region in order that the nature and
character of the seat of the Government of Canada may be in accordance with its national significance”. [156]
The NCC has the responsibility for maintaining the grounds on Parliament Hill [157]
and this historic site is the focal point of much other NCC-sponsored activity. The Speaker is naturally
interested to ensure that all such activity takes place with due regard to the dignity and authority of
the institution and the privileges of Members, such as the right to have access to the House of Commons
and the parliamentary precinct at all times.
Ceremonial /Diplomatic Role of the Speaker
Certain responsibilities of the Speaker may be categorized as being of a traditional, ceremonial or
diplomatic nature, highlighting the role of the Speaker as a representative of the Commons. The Speaker
is the representative and spokesperson for the House of Commons in its relations with the Senate, the
Crown and other bodies outside the House of Commons. Messages, correspondence and documents addressed to
the House of Commons are communicated to it by the Speaker. [158]
When entering or leaving the House, the Speaker is always preceded by the Sergeant-at-Arms, who carries the
Mace. [159]
The opening of a sitting of the House is preceded by a ceremonial event known as the Speaker’s parade,
in which the Speaker walks in procession through the halls of the Centre Block to the House of Commons
Chamber. [160]
Whenever the House is summoned to the Senate Chamber to attend the Queen, the Governor General, or the
representative of the Governor General, the Speaker leads the procession. This happens at the opening of a
Parliament and of a session, [161]
or whenever there is to be a ceremony to grant Royal Assent to bills. [162]
When a new Parliament or new session opens and a Speech from the Throne is read in the Senate Chamber, it
is then officially communicated to the House by the Speaker. When the House has debated the Address in
Reply to the Speech from the Throne, the text of the Address is engrossed, signed by the Speaker and
personally presented to the Governor General. [163]
The Parliament of Canada maintains relations with the provincial and territorial legislatures as well as
with most foreign parliaments. Many of these relationships are carried on by, or in the name of, the
Speaker of the House of Commons and the Speaker of the Senate. Contacts between the Parliament of Canada
and other parliaments and legislative assemblies may range from exchanges of correspondence, to formal
visits conducted on a reciprocal basis, to training and development sessions for parliamentary officers.
The Parliament of Canada is an active participant in the international exchange of ideas, information and
experiences among world parliaments, and holds membership in several inter-parliamentary associations and
friendship groups. [164]
The Speaker of the House is an honorary president of each of them and, with the Speaker of the Senate,
authorizes the budgetary allocations for each association. [165]
Parliamentarians (as delegates, members or participants) attend national, bilateral and international
meetings, conferences and seminars arranged through the parliamentary associations and friendship groups.
Outside the framework of the inter-parliamentary associations, the Parliament of Canada also participates in
exchanges and programs of parliamentary co-operation with other parliaments throughout the world,
authorized and overseen by both Speakers. Parliamentary exchanges offer parliamentarians the opportunity to
broaden their knowledge, to discuss problems of mutual interest and issues of the day. The Speaker’s
involvement may include accepting invitations from other parliaments, hosting visiting delegations of
parliamentarians, and participating in the meetings of Speakers from Canada and abroad.
During a sitting, the Speaker may draw the attention of the House to the presence of distinguished visitors
seated in the gallery of the House. [166]
Generally, this takes place immediately following Question Period, though the Speaker has also recognized
visitors prior to Question Period and even during Question Period. [167]
In most cases, the visitors recognized are seated in the Speaker’s Gallery. [168]
No written rules or formal guidelines exist to define what type of visitors the Speaker shall recognize.
The practice has been to recognize:
- heads of state and leaders of foreign governments, and official guests of the Governor General or of
the Prime Minister;
- parliamentary delegations, presiding officers and cabinet ministers from provincial and territorial
legislative assemblies, or from foreign countries;
- Canadians who have distinguished themselves in any field of endeavour by their achievements, deeds or
success of national or international scope. [169]
From time to time, a distinguished visitor (usually a head of state or of government) has given a joint
address to Members of the House of Commons and Senators in the House of Commons Chamber. The Speaker, as
host, takes a pre-eminent role in such events, which are organized in accordance with an established
protocol. [170]
Election of the Speaker as Presiding Officer
The election of the Speaker of the House of Commons is a constitutional requirement. [171]
An election must take place at the beginning of the first session of a Parliament, when the House is
without a Speaker. Should the Speaker resign or state his or her intention to resign in mid-Parliament,
election proceedings again take place; a vacancy occurring for any other reason also leads to the election
of a new Speaker. [172]
This constitutional requirement is the basis of the Standing Orders which specify when and under what
circumstances the election of a Speaker takes place. [173]
Although the Speaker has in most cases been elected at the opening of the first session of a Parliament,
several Speakers have been elected in mid-session or at the opening of the second or later session of a
Parliament. [174]
In any case, the election takes precedence over all other business and is not to be considered as a
question of confidence in the government. [175]
If necessary, the election continues beyond the ordinary hour of daily adjournment until a Speaker is
elected. No other business can come before the House until the election has taken place and the new Speaker
has taken the Chair. [176]
Although the time at which a Speaker is to be elected is described in the Constitution, no Standing Order
before 1985 ever indicated by what means this should be accomplished. From 1867 to 1985, the Clerk of the
House conducted the election. The general practice was for the Prime Minister to propose the name of a
Member to become Speaker. This debatable motion was usually seconded by a leading Minister, although
starting in 1953, the nomination typically was seconded by the Leader of the Opposition. [177]
After debate on the motion, the question was put by the Clerk and the Member was elected by a majority of
the Members present; in almost all cases, the motion was carried unanimously. [178]
The Speaker-elect, showing mock reticence, was then escorted to the Chair by the mover and seconder, after
which he or she accepted the nomination and the Mace was placed on the Table. It has been customary for the
Speaker-elect to make a pretence of reluctance while being escorted to the Chair. This has its origin in
the genuine reluctance with which early British Speakers assumed their duties. [179]
In 1982, the Special Committee on Standing Orders and Procedure (known after its chairman as the Lefebvre
Committee) recommended a new procedure to be followed in electing a Speaker by secret ballot. [180]
The recommendation was acted upon in 1985, when the government responded favourably to a re-issue of the
recommendation by the Special Committee on the Reform of the House of Commons (known after its chairman as
the McGrath Committee). [181]
In its response, the government suggested changes to the recommendation that were later reflected in
proposed amendments to the Standing Orders. The amendments were adopted by the House in June 1985. [182]
The new procedure went into effect in September of that year on a provisional basis and was first invoked
in 1986 when Speaker Bosley resigned the Speakership and, after 11 ballots, the House elected John Fraser
as the new Speaker. [183]
The protracted election prompted calls for changes in the process; to that end, the Standing Orders were
amended in 1987, to exclude from a subsequent ballot candidates receiving five percent or less of the total
votes cast. At the same time, the secret ballot procedure became permanent. [184]
In 1988, Speaker Fraser was re-elected on the first ballot. In 1994, Speaker Parent was elected after six
ballots, and re-elected in 1997 after four ballots.
Election of the Speaker by Secret Ballot
When the House meets at the beginning of a new Parliament, Members are summoned to the Senate Chamber
through a message delivered to the House by the Usher of the Black Rod. [185]
Preceded by the Clerk of the House, the Members go to the Senate Chamber where they are informed by a
Deputy of the Governor General [186]
that the causes of summoning will not be divulged (meaning that the Speech from the Throne will not be
read) “until the Speaker of the House of Commons shall have been chosen according to Law …”.
The Members then return to the House and proceed immediately to the election of a Speaker.
All Members of the House, except for Ministers and party leaders, are automatically considered candidates
for the Speakership. [187]
The Standing Orders designate who shall preside over the election of a Speaker [188]
but are silent as to whether the Member presiding could also be a candidate. In all four elections to date,
the Member presiding took the prescribed action to remove himself from the list of candidates. Any eligible
Member who does not wish to be considered must so inform the Clerk in writing by 6:00 p.m., at the latest,
on the day before the election is to take place. [189]
The notice of withdrawal must be signed by the Member. [190]
After the deadline has passed, the Clerk draws up an alphabetical list of the names of Members who do not
wish to be considered or who are ineligible by virtue of being Ministers or party leaders. A Member who has
withdrawn may, before the deadline, recall the letter of withdrawal and allow his or her name to go forward. [191]
The rules providing for the Speaker’s election by secret ballot are silent on many aspects of the
election process. In 1986, when preparations began for the first secret-ballot election, matters not
covered by the written rules were settled by the Clerk in consultation with the House Leaders, and have
since then become part of the practice associated with an election of the Speaker. [192]
The Chamber is set up somewhat differently from normal when a Speaker is to be elected. The Table is cleared
of its usual accoutrements and, while the Clerk’s chair remains at its head, the chairs of the Table
Officers are removed. A ballot box is placed on a stand at the foot of the Table and portable voting booths
are placed on either side of the Table. While the election proceeds, the Mace rests under the Table as no
Speaker is in the Chair.
When the election of a Speaker takes place at the beginning of a Parliament, it is presided over by the so
-called “dean of the House”, the Member with the longest unbroken record of service who is
neither a Minister nor a holder of any office within the House. [193]
After the return of the House from the Senate Chamber, the Clerk invites the dean of the House to take the
Chair as the Member presiding. When an election is held during a Parliament to replace a Speaker who has
given notice of his or her intention to resign, as was the case in 1986, the outgoing Speaker presides. [194]
In the absence of an outgoing Speaker at an election taking place in the course of a Parliament, the
Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Whole would preside. [195]
The Member presiding is vested with all the powers of the Chair and votes in the election; however, he or
she may not cast an additional ballot in the event of a tie. [196]
The Standing Orders require the Member presiding to inform the House that the list of Members who do not
wish to be considered for election to the office of Speaker, or who are ineligible, is available for
consultation at the Table. [197]
This is done before balloting begins; at the same time, the Member presiding reads out (in alphabetical
order) the names of the Members appearing on the first ballot, and informs the House that this list is
available in each voting booth. Both these lists will also have been distributed to Members at their desks.
It has happened that Members not wishing to be considered have sought to remove their names before having
passed the start of voting. The Member presiding has responded that, the deadline having passed (6:00 p.m.
of the previous day), the list for the first ballot cannot be amended, but doubtless the House would take
note of any such request. [198]
The voting begins when the Member presiding asks those who wish to cast their ballots to leave their desks,
proceed along the corridors behind the curtains in the direction of the Chair, and come to the Table
through the doorways at the left and right of the Chair, according to whether the Members sit on the Speaker’s
left or right.
At these doorways, Members have their names recorded and are issued ballot papers by Table Officers
assisting the Clerk. [199]
Members must enter through the doorway on the side of the House where they are seated. Once provided with a
ballot paper, Members then proceed to the voting booth on the appropriate side of the Table. Members print
the first and last names of a candidate on the ballot paper, [200]
deposit the paper in the ballot box [201]
and then leave the area around the Table in order to ensure the confidentiality of the vote for other
Members.
When the Member presiding is satisfied that all Members wishing to vote have done so, the Clerk
withdraws from the Chamber to count the ballots, with the assistance of other Table Officers, in a nearby
room. The Sergeant-at-Arms carries the ballot box, and pauses by the Chair while the Member presiding
deposits his or her ballot paper. The Member presiding then signifies that the proceedings are suspended
while the counting of the ballots takes place.
The ballots are counted in secret. Once the Clerk is satisfied as to the accuracy of the count, all ballot
papers and related records are destroyed. The Clerk is enjoined by the Standing Orders not to divulge in any
way the number of ballots cast for any candidate. [202]
When the count is complete, the bells are rung for a few minutes to call the House to order and the Clerk
re-enters he Chamber.
If any Member has received a majority of the votes cast, the Clerk gives the Member presiding the name of
the successful candidate, which is then announced from the Chair. [203]
If no Member has received a majority of the votes cast, then the Clerk provides the Member presiding with
a list of the candidates in alphabetical order for the next ballot. The list is drawn up as follows: from
the original list of candidates, the Clerk deletes the name of the last-place candidate (or names, in the
case of a tie vote for last place), as well as the name of any Member who received five percent or less of
the total votes cast. [204]
The rule further provides that no names be deleted in the event that every candidate receives the same
number of votes. The Member presiding announces that a second ballot will be necessary and reads out the
names of the candidates. At this point, any candidates on the second ballot who do not wish to be further
considered may rise and withdraw, stating their reasons. [205]
The Clerk is then instructed to remove from the list the names of Members who have thus withdrawn. When an
alphabetical list of eligible Members is available in each voting booth, the Member presiding asks Members
who wish to vote to proceed in the same manner as for the first ballot.
The voting procedure for the second ballot is the same as for the first, except that the ballot papers are a
different colour. When the Member presiding is satisfied that all Members wishing to vote have done so, he
or she instructs the Clerk to proceed with the count of the second ballot. When the count is complete, the
Clerk destroys all the ballot papers and related records, again to ensure the secrecy of the count as
required by the Standing Orders.
The Member presiding then calls the House to order and either announces the name of the successful candidate,
or that a third ballot will be necessary, in which case the names of the candidates eligible for the third
ballot will be read from the list prepared by the Clerk. Members who wish to withdraw their candidacy at
this point or on any subsequent ballot may do so and are not required to give reasons. [206]
The names of those who withdraw are then removed from the list of eligible candidates and, when the list is
made available, the Members proceed to vote.
Balloting continues in this fashion until one candidate has received a majority of the votes cast or until
only one name remains. If necessary, the House may continue to sit beyond its usual adjournment time until
a Speaker is declared elected. [207]
After announcing the name of the successful candidate from the Chair, the Member presiding invites the
Speaker-elect to take the Chair. The Member presiding steps down and escorts the Speaker-elect from his or
her seat to the dais. The Speaker-elect may make a token show of resistance. [208]
Standing at the top of the steps, the first official act of every Speaker elected since Confederation has
been to thank the House for the honour it has bestowed. The opening words follow a pattern established over
time: “Honourable Members, I beg to return my humble acknowledgements to the House for the great
honour you have been pleased to confer upon me in choosing me to be your Speaker”.
Speakers have typically included in their remarks a pledge to carry out their duties with firmness and
impartiality, an acknowledgement of the great responsibilities of the office, a request to the House for
its continued support and goodwill, and acknowledgements and commendations directed to predecessors, other
candidates (in the case of secret-ballot elections), constituents, family and fellow Members. [209]
The Speaker then takes the Chair. The voting booths and ballot box having been removed, the Sergeant-at-Arms
takes the Mace (symbol of the authority of the House) from under the Table, where it sits during the
election, and places it on the Table, signifying that now with the Speaker in the Chair, the House is
properly constituted.
Since the Speaker has been elected by secret ballot, the party leaders have risen on occasion to offer
congratulations and good wishes, and to pledge their support once the newly elected Speaker has taken the
Chair and the Mace has been laid on the Table. [210]
Before 1986, when the Speaker was nominated on a motion moved by the Prime Minister and elected when the
motion was adopted by the House, it was the custom for the individual nominated to be warmly spoken of in
the nomination speeches of the Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition, and congratulatory remarks
after the election did not occur as a rule. [211]
By the time the new Speaker has taken the Chair and heard from any Members wishing to offer
congratulations, the House may have gone beyond its usual time of adjournment as set out in the Standing
Orders; under these circumstances, the Speaker adjourns the House until the next sitting day. [212]
This occurred in 1986 when the House adjourned at 2:30 a.m. to reconvene later the same day for the opening
of the session. [213]
In 1988, the Speaker was elected after a single ballot, and the sitting was suspended for several hours
until the opening of Parliament later the same day. [214]
At other times, the Speaker was elected before the House reached its usual adjournment time, and the House
then adjourned to the following day at the time fixed for the opening of Parliament. [215]
During the election of a Speaker, debate is not permitted, no motions are accepted and the Member presiding
may not entertain any question of privilege. [216]
On one occasion, a point of order was raised and settled by the Chair. [217]
At the time fixed for the formal opening of Parliament with a Speech from the Throne, the House receives the
Usher of the Black Rod and goes in procession to the Senate Chamber. At the Bar of the Senate, the newly
elected Speaker stands on a small platform, removes his or her three-cornered hat and receives an
acknowledgement from the Governor General, who is seated on the Throne. The Speaker addresses the Governor
General by an established formula, as follows:
May it please Your Excellency,
The House of Commons has elected me their Speaker, though I am but little able to fulfil the important duties
thus assigned to me. If, in the performance of those duties, I should at any time fall into error, I pray
that the fault may be imputed to me, and not to the Commons, whose servant I am, and who, through me, the
better to enable them to discharge their duty to their Queen and Country, humbly claim all their undoubted
rights and privileges, especially that they may have freedom of speech in their debates, access to Your
Excellency’s person at all seasonable times, and that their proceedings may receive from Your
Excellency the most favourable construction. [218]
The Speaker of the Senate, on behalf of the Governor General, makes the traditional reply:
Mr./Madam Speaker,
I am commanded by His/Her Excellency the Governor General to declare to you that he/she freely confides in
the duty and attachment of the House of Commons to Her Majesty’s Person and Government, and not
doubting that their proceedings will be conducted with wisdom, temper and prudence, he/she grants, and upon
all occasions will recognize and allow, their constitutional privileges. I am commanded also to assure you
that the Commons shall have ready access to His/Her Excellency upon all seasonable occasions and that their
proceedings, as well as your words and actions, will constantly receive from him/her the most favourable
construction. [219]
A new Speaker always presents himself or herself to the Governor General; however, the claiming of
privileges by the Speaker on behalf of the House takes place only at the opening of a Parliament and is not
repeated in the event that a new Speaker is elected before the end of the Parliament. [220]
Election of the Speaker During a Session
When a Speaker is to be elected during a session, the Members assemble in the House at the usual time for
the start of the sitting. The Chair is taken either by the Speaker who has already indicated his or her
intention to resign the office, [221]
or, in the absence of the Speaker, by the Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Whole. [222]
Because the office of Speaker is vacant, the Mace is not on the Table. [223]
The Prime Minister informs the Members that the Governor General has given leave to the House to elect a
Speaker. The Chair occupant then presides over the usual proceedings for the election of a Speaker. Once a
successful candidate is announced, the Speaker-elect is escorted from his or her place and makes some brief
remarks from the upper steps before taking the Chair for the first time. The Mace is then placed on the
Table and the sitting is suspended for a few minutes pending the arrival of the Usher of the Black Rod.
Once summoned, the House proceeds to the Senate Chamber where the Speaker presents himself or herself and
receives the Governor General’s acknowledgement, in the traditional wording. [224]
On its return from the Senate, the House proceeds to the business of the sitting.
Only two of the 33 Speakers elected since Confederation were elected during a session. [225]
Both cases predate the current rules providing for the election of the Speaker by secret ballot. In 1899,
Speaker Bain succeeded Speaker Edgar, the only Speaker to have died while in office, and presided over the
House for the remainder of the Eighth Parliament, until 1901. Speaker Francis was elected during the
Thirty-Second Parliament (1984) to succeed Speaker Sauvé, who resigned to become Governor General of
Canada. Speaker Bain and Speaker Francis presided over the House for the balance of the session and the
Parliament in which they were elected.
Election of the Speaker at the Opening of a Second or Later Session Within a Parliament
When the House is to proceed to the election of a Speaker immediately at the opening of the second or
subsequent session within a Parliament, the House meets for the opening of the session on the date fixed by
proclamation. As for the election of a Speaker during a session, the Chair is taken either by the Speaker
who has already indicated his or her intention to resign the office, or by the Deputy Speaker, and the Mace
is not on the Table. The Prime Minister is recognized and signifies the consent of the Governor General to
proceed to the election of a new Speaker. [226]
The House then goes through the usual proceedings for the election of a Speaker. The Speaker-elect is
escorted from his or her seat to the dais where he or she makes the usual remarks and acknowledgements and
takes the Chair for the first time. The Mace is then placed on the Table. The sitting would normally be
adjourned at this point or shortly thereafter, and the presentation of the Speaker to the Governor General
and the reading of the Speech from the Throne would take place the following day. [227]
The election of a Speaker on the opening day of the second or subsequent session of a Parliament has
occurred six times since 1867. [228]
Each time, the vacancy in the Speakership arose through resignation. In 1986, the most recent example,
Speaker Bosley’s resignation took effect on the opening day of the Second Session of the Thirty-Third
Parliament, and Speaker Fraser then became the first to take the Chair under the new rules for the election
of the Speaker by secret ballot.
In all six cases, the House met for the opening of the session on the date fixed by proclamation. In the
five cases preceding 1986, the House was immediately summoned to the Senate and advised (as at the opening
of a Parliament) that a Speaker must be chosen before the Speech from the Throne could be read. [229]
On its return from the Senate, the House proceeded to the election of a Speaker; a Member was nominated by
the Prime Minister, seconded by a leading Minister, and (with one exception [230] )
after a brief intervention by the Leader of the Opposition, the person nominated was unanimously elected.
Campaigning for the Speakership
The rules for the election of the Speaker by secret ballot contain no provision for a nomination process and
are silent on the matter of campaigning for the office. [231]
The special procedure committee which recommended the secret-ballot process sought to give control of the
choice of Speaker to the House and its Members (away from what it called the “exclusive control”
of the Prime Minister), noting that the Speaker belongs not to the government or opposition but to the House. [232]
Speaker Bosley, appearing before the committee in 1985, expressed reservations about the success of a
secret-ballot system should political-style campaigning be resorted to. [233]
In each of the four secret-ballot elections held to date (1986, 1988, 1994, 1997), campaign activity
occurred but took place informally, outside the Chamber, because the rules do not permit debate during the
election process. [234]
In recent years, Members have noted the difficulty faced by those newly elected to the House who are called
upon to choose a Speaker with little time or opportunity to become informed about all the candidates. [235]
Prior to the election for the Speaker in 1994, some of the parties in the House organized caucus meetings
to which individual candidates were invited. [236]
Prior to the 1997 election, it was suggested that candidates should declare themselves and attend an
all-party question-and-answer session organized by one of the four opposition parties. [237]
Tenure
A Speaker is elected as the first item of business at the start of each Parliament, and presides over the
House for the life of the Parliament. [238]
When the Parliament is dissolved, the Speaker is deemed to remain in office for administrative purposes
until a new election takes place. [239]
Should a vacancy in the Speakership occur during a Parliament, another Speaker must be elected forthwith; [240]
no other business can come before the House until a new Speaker has been chosen.
A vacancy in the Speakership can arise through death or resignation of the office. Speaker Edgar (1896-99)
died while in office, in July 1899, during a session. Speaker Edgar had been away from the House for some
time, due to indisposition. In his absence, the Chair was taken by the Deputy Speaker. [241]
Speaker Edgar’s death was announced to the House on July 31, 1899, by the Prime Minister, who then
moved a motion for the adjournment of the House. After a brief intervention by a Member of the opposition,
the motion was adopted and the sitting was adjourned. [242]
The next day, the House met at its usual time and immediately proceeded to elect a new Speaker. [243]
A vacancy in the Speakership may occur when the Speaker expresses an intent to resign the office or if the
House were to take action to remove the Speaker from office. It has also happened that the office of
Speaker has been vacated when the incumbent accepted a position which necessitated an automatic
relinquishing of his or her seat in the House.
On three occasions, a vacancy in the Speakership arose after the Speaker gave written notice of intent to
resign. The resignations were those of Speaker Black in 1935, Speaker Sauvé in 1984 and Speaker
Bosley in 1986.
The resignation of Speaker Black (1930-35) as Speaker was tendered in a letter to the Prime Minister dated
January 15, 1935, during a prorogation. This was announced to the House by the Prime Minister when the House
met on January 17, the date set for the opening of the session. The House then proceeded to elect a new
Speaker. [244]
Speaker Sauvé (1980-84), having been designated to become Governor General of Canada, resigned as a
Member and as Speaker by letter to the Clerk of the House dated January 6, 1984. The letter stated that her
resignation would take effect as of midnight, January 15, 1984. The House, which had adjourned on December
21, reconvened on January 16, and the Clerk read the letter. The House then proceeded to the election of
Speaker Francis. [245]
Speaker Bosley (1984-86) resigned the Speakership in 1986. His concern about the “erosion of public
respect for Parliament” was known, and it was his opinion that he could best contribute to the reform
of the institution as a private Member, giving the House an “unfettered” choice of Speaker by
the new secret-ballot process. [246]
He wrote to the Clerk on September 5, 1986, while Parliament was prorogued, tendering his resignation to
take effect with the election of a successor on the date set by proclamation for the opening of the new
session. When the House met on September 30, the Speaker tabled copies of the correspondence and expressed
his acknowledgements to the House for the honour of having served as its Speaker. Then, pursuant to
Standing Order, he presided over the election by secret ballot of Speaker Fraser. [247]
In three further instances, Speakers accepted other positions, by virtue of which their seats in the House
(and thus the Speakership) were relinquished. Speaker Brodeur (1901-04) and Speaker Sévigny (1916-17)
were appointed to Cabinet [248]
and Speaker Sproule (1911-15) was appointed to the Senate. [249]
In each case, the appointment took effect during the interval between two sessions and, therefore, no
formal indication of intent to resign was communicated to the House. On those occasions, when the House
reconvened, it met without a Speaker. The letter informing the House of the Deputy Governor General’s
arrival for the opening of the new session, normally read by the Speaker, was instead read by the Clerk.
Later, when in accordance with usual practice, the Clerk announced the list of electoral districts for which
notifications of vacancy had been received, among them were those of Speaker Brodeur in 1904, [250]
Speaker Sproule in 1916 [251]
and Speaker Sévigny in 1917. [252]
There is also the unusual example of Speaker Anglin, who was twice elected Speaker in the course of the
Third Parliament (1874-78). First elected at the opening of Parliament in 1874, he vacated his seat in the
House during the intersession. [253]
A by-election was held, in which Mr. Anglin was re-elected. Thus, when the new session opened on February
7, 1878, the House was informed both of the vacancy in the riding held by the former Speaker, and of his
re-election to the House. [254]
He was again nominated for the Speakership, and re-elected. [255]
Few examples exist in Canada where the resignation of a Speaker was secured following the action of a
legislative body to effect a removal. [256]
In 1875, in the House of Assembly of the province of Nova Scotia, a motion was moved which proposed that
the Speaker’s resignation be requested and that a new Speaker be elected. [257]
The motion was adopted on a recorded division, and the House then adjourned to the following day when, as
the first item of business, the Speaker rose, tendered his resignation and left the Chair. [258]
The House then adopted a motion, moved by a member of the cabinet, that the resignation be accepted and
that a committee of Ministers be struck to inform the Lieutenant Governor that the House was without a
Speaker. [259]
When the House next met, the Committee reported that it had communicated with the Lieutenant Governor; a
new Speaker was then elected. [260]
In July 1956, in the House of Commons, Speaker Beaudoin (1953-57) offered his resignation, but this offer
was not taken up by the House. This occurred on the heels of the political controversy and procedural
disputes of what has since become known as the Pipeline Debate. [261]
During the consideration of the pipeline bill, numerous points of order were raised and the Chair faced
many challenges. There were 25 appeals from rulings of the Chair (allowed under the rules in effect at that
time), all of which were sustained. [262]
A motion of censure against the Speaker was moved and defeated. [263]
This is the only instance of a motion of censure against a Speaker of the House of Commons of Canada. Three
weeks after passage of the bill by the House, a question of privilege was raised which called into question
the Speaker’s impartiality. [264]
On July 2, at the opening of the sitting, the Speaker made a statement and placed his resignation before
the House to take effect at the pleasure of the House. [265]
However, no resolution of the House was forthcoming and no objection was registered when the Speaker
continued to fulfil his official duties. Speaker Beaudoin served for the balance of the Twenty-Second
Parliament.
There have been other cases where motions of censure were brought against Speakers of the Senate and other
legislatures in Canada; however, none were adopted. [266]
Other Presiding Officers
Historical Perspective
At Confederation, the constitutional responsibility of the Speaker to “preside at all meetings”
of the House [267]
was fulfilled by the Speaker alone, as there were no provisions allowing another Member to take the Chair. [268]
After just a few months, the First Parliament passed an Act which allowed the Speaker to choose any Member
to occupy the Chair in the Speaker’s absence during the course of a sitting. [269]
When the House formed itself into a Committee of the Whole, the Speaker had the authority to select a
Member to act as Chairman. [270]
Many Members were called upon to fulfil this task. [271]
There could be no guarantee that Members selected ad hoc to preside over the House or a Committee
of the Whole would be conversant with the rules or able to arrive at a satisfactory resolution of questions
of order. There were no set adjournment times for the daily sittings, and the House typically sat late into
the evening. All this tended to add to the burden of responsibility carried by the Speaker.
In 1885, having cited the British practice as an example to follow, the Prime Minister put forward the
proposition that the House would be better served if the positions of Speaker and Chairman of Committees of
the Whole were divided into two offices so that a permanent Chairmanship of Committees of the Whole would
be established. The salaried incumbent could also act as Speaker both at the beginning of and during a
sitting when the Speaker was absent. [272]
The Speaker would retain the right to call any Member to take the Chair temporarily during a sitting and
would still be obliged, in the absence of the Chairman, to select another Member to chair any Committee of
the Whole. The House was not entirely convinced of the need; [273]
nevertheless, the Prime Minister pursued the matter. After debate, rules were adopted providing for a
Chairman of Committees of the Whole to hold office for the duration of a Parliament [274]
and, later that year, a bill was passed enabling this Chairman to act as Speaker in the Speaker’s
absence. [275]
The provisions of that Act are now found in the Parliament of Canada Act and were the basis for
subsequent changes in the Standing Orders, which vested in the Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees
of the Whole all the legal powers of the Speaker when he or she is absent from the House.
In the years that followed, it became accepted practice for the Deputy Speaker, on occasion, to delegate the
powers of Chairman to other Members. [276]
In 1938, when it was foreseen that the Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Whole would be
absent from the House for a period of time, the House adopted an amendment to the rules to provide for the
selection of a Deputy Chairman of Committees of the Whole who would have all the powers of the Chairman. [277]
The rule codified the power of the Chairman to open a sitting of the House in the Speaker’s absence,
a power that up to then had not been shared. [278]
It was suggested that the new position would not be permanent but would be filled only as required; [279]
the rule provided for the office of Deputy Chairman to be filled on a sessional basis or as the need arose.
After the initial appointment for a single session in 1938, the post was left vacant for nine years and not
filled until 1947. [280]
From 1947 to 1953, subsequent appointments were made as the need arose. [281]
When nominating a Deputy Chairman of Committees of the Whole in 1953, the Prime Minister referred to the
appointment as “completing the organization of the personnel of the House” [282]
and, thereafter, the practice of selecting a Deputy Chairman for the duration of each session was
established.
As the work of the House and the length of its sessions continued to increase, the House identified a need
for the services of an additional Presiding Officer. The position of Assistant Deputy Chairman of Committees
of the Whole was created in 1967, through an amendment to the rules pursuant to the recommendation of a special
committee on procedure. [283]
Again, the rule enabled the incumbent to exercise all the powers of the Chairman of Committees of the
Whole, including those of Deputy Speaker, during the Speaker’s absence. There was no suggestion that
the position should be temporary, and since 1971 it has been routinely filled. [284]
The written rules on other Presiding Officers have undergone little change over the years. In 1906, the rule
obliging the Speaker to appoint a Member to preside at any Committee of the Whole (“shall appoint”)
was relaxed so as to remove the element of obligation (“may appoint”). [285]
In 1927, the term “Deputy Speaker”, which had for some time been in common use among Members in
referring to the Chairman of Committees of the Whole, began to be used in the written rules. [286]
The original rules governing the selection of the Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Whole
explicitly required the selection to take place at the start of each Parliament, after the Address in Reply
from the Speech from the Throne had been agreed to. However, this rule was not always adhered to [287]
and, in 1955, it was amended so that the selection could be made early in a new Parliament, regardless of
whether or not the Address had yet been agreed to. [288]
In 1968, a reference to its British antecedents was dropped from the rule providing for the appointment of
the Deputy Speaker. [289]
Authority
Every action of the Deputy Speaker, when acting in the Speaker’s place, has the same effect and
validity as if the Speaker had acted; or, in the terms of the Parliament of Canada Act:
Every act done and warrant, order or other document issued, signed or published by a Deputy Speaker
… that relates to any proceedings of the House of Commons or that, under any statute, would be
done, issued, signed or published by the Speaker, if then able to act, has the same effect and validity as
if it had been done, issued, signed or published by the Speaker. [290]
At the start of a sitting, the Parliament of Canada Act provides that when the Speaker’s
unavoidable absence is announced to the House by the Clerk, [291]
the Deputy Speaker takes the Chair. If the Speaker is still absent at the start of the next sitting, the
Deputy Speaker again assumes the Speaker’s role and may continue to do so from day to day until the
Speaker’s return. If the House should adjourn for longer than 24 hours, the Deputy Speaker can
continue to act as Speaker only for 24 hours from the time of adjournment. [292]
From time to time, the Speaker has been absent at the beginning of a sitting; more rarely, the Speaker has
been absent over several consecutive sittings. [293]
It has happened that in the absence of both the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker, the Deputy Chairman and
Assistant Deputy Chairman, as alternates to the Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Whole,
have opened a sitting of the House. [294]
In such cases, they are entitled to exercise all the powers vested in the Deputy Speaker during the
Speaker’s absence. [295]
Role
The primary roles of the Deputy Speaker and the other Presiding Officers are to support the Speaker in the
Chamber as presiding officers, to take the Chair when the House sits as a Committee of the Whole and, on
occasion, to chair legislative committees. In addition, the Deputy Speaker has certain administrative
responsibilities.
In the House, the Speaker is generally in the Chair at specific times: at the opening of the sitting and
during Members’ Statements, Oral Questions and Routine Proceedings. The remaining time in the Chair
is shared by the Deputy Speaker and the other Presiding Officers. [296]
On occasion, the Speaker or one of the other Presiding Officers may choose another Member to replace them
for a short period.
When the House forms itself into a Committee of the Whole, it is the duty of the Chairman of Committees of
the Whole to take the Chair if present in his or her place in the House. [297]
The fact that the rules now provide for the selection of a Deputy and Assistant Deputy Chairman of Commitees
of the Whole does not, in theory, affect the Speaker’s power to appoint another Member to preside as
Chairman in the absence of the Deputy Speaker; [298]
however, in keeping with the practice established at the turn of the twentieth century, the task of filling
the acting chairmanship typically falls to the Member presiding as Speaker. [299]
It has rarely been necessary for the Speaker to call upon another Member.
As regards administrative responsibilities, the Deputy Speaker may be asked to serve on the Board of
Internal Economy [300]
and is usually a member of the Executive Committee. With the Deputy and Assistant Deputy Chairman of
Committees of the Whole, the Deputy Speaker is a member of the Panel of Chairmen for legislative committees,
and may thus be appointed by the Speaker to chair a legislative committee, or act in place of the Speaker
to appoint Members to chair legislative committees. [301]
On one occasion, the House adopted a special order establishing a special committee to be chaired by the
Deputy Speaker. [302]
While the Standing Orders provide for the Speaker’s impartiality and independence by enjoining him
or her not to participate in any debate before the House, [303]
there is no such clear statement as to whether the Deputy Speaker and other Presiding Officers should take
part in debate. Until the 1930s, it was not unusual for the Deputy Speaker to participate actively in
debate, [304]
and there has been controversy from time to time over the extent to which the Chair occupants (other than
the Speaker) should remain aloof from partisan politics. [305]
In 1931, when a question arose as to the propriety of the Deputy Speaker speaking in debate, it was
generally felt that the actions of the Deputy Speaker must be governed by “good taste and judgement”. [306]
Since then, and in the absence of any rule or guideline governing the political activities of Presiding
Officers of the House or limiting their participation in debate or voting, the degree of participation has
been an individual decision. In 1993, Deputy Speaker Champagne agreed to act as co-Chair of her party’s
leadership convention. A question of privilege was raised in the House by a Member who argued that this
decision affected the appearance of impartiality attached to the office of Deputy Speaker and that she was
therefore guilty of a contempt of the House. Speaker Fraser ruled that, given the existing practice and the
absence of clear direction from the House, Deputy Speakers have used varying degrees of discretion in terms
of their party involvement. He clarified that they remain members of their political parties and, unlike
the Speaker, may attend caucus meetings, participate in debate and vote. The Speaker ruled that the Deputy
Speaker is not “cloaked with the same exigencies that are expected of the Speaker” and that the
matter did not constitute a prima facie case of privilege. [307]
In accordance with recent practice, the Deputy Speaker and other Presiding Officers generally avoid taking
part in debate, but do for the most part maintain their right to vote when not presiding over the House. [308]
In 1985, when the Assistant Deputy Chairman participated in debate on a bill before the House, an objection
was raised. [309]
Presiding Officers (with the exception of the Speaker) have presented petitions [310]
and made Members’ Statements, [311]
and no objection has been made. On occasion, a Presiding Officer has taken the opportunity to offer a
comment from the Chair, and again no objection was made. [312]
In general, occupants of the Chair have not sponsored or pursued private Members’ bills or motions, [313]
or placed written questions on the Order Paper. [314]
Method of Selection
The rules of the House provide for the selection of the Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the
Whole. [315]
The Deputy Speaker is selected at the start of every Parliament and holds office for the duration of the
Parliament. The selection generally occurs after the Speaker’s report to the House on the Speech from
the Throne, at the opening of the first session. [316]
A Member, usually the Prime Minister, [317]
moves a motion proposing that a certain Member assume the office of Deputy Speaker and Chairman of
Committees of the Whole House. With a few exceptions, the proposed Member has been from the government side
of the House [318]
and the motion has been seconded by a government Member. [319]
The rules require the Deputy Speaker to be fluent in the official language which is not that of the Speaker
“for the time being”. [320]
The names put forward have rarely met with opposition. [321]
The rules provide similarly for the selection of a Deputy Chairman and Assistant Deputy Chairman of
Committees of the Whole for a session. [322]
The appointments are made at the start of each session, or from time to time as necessary, by means of a
motion moved and seconded by Members from the government side of the House. [323]
In some recent cases, adoption of the motion has been preceded by debate and a recorded division. [324]
With just one exception, the Members selected to the offices of Deputy Chairman and Assistant Deputy
Chairman of Committees of the Whole have come from the government benches. [325]
Tenure
The selection of a Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Whole is effective for the life of the
Parliament; in the event of a vacancy in the office “by death, resignation, or otherwise”, the
House is required to proceed “forthwith” to the selection of a successor. [326]
Vacancies in the office of Deputy Speaker have occurred between sessions as well as during a session.
Vacancies have occurred four times between sessions (1889, 1914, 1959 and 1961), when Members who were
occupying the Chair as Deputy Speaker were appointed to Cabinet positions. Charles Carroll Colby and
Pierre-Édouard Blondin were appointed to Cabinet in 1889 and 1914 respectively. As was the law at the
time, they resigned their seats as Members, thus vacating the office of Deputy Speaker and Chairman of
Committees of the Whole. [327]
Each was re-elected in by-elections between sessions and in each case, on the first day of the new session,
the Speaker informed the House of the vacancy in representation and then announced the certificate of
election and return of the Member. [328]
On the fourth and third sitting day of the new session respectively, a new Deputy Speaker was selected; [329]
in accordance with the rules in effect at the time, the selection could not take place until after the
Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne had been agreed to. [330]
Pierre Sévigny and Jacques Flynn were appointed to Cabinet in 1959 and 1961 respectively. In each
case, on the first day of the new session, following the Speech from the Throne, the Prime Minister
informed the House of changes to the Cabinet and then moved a motion to appoint a Deputy Speaker and
Chairman of Committees of the Whole. [331]
In none of the foregoing cases do the official publications mention a resignation or letter of resignation
communicated to the House by the Speaker.
There have also been vacancies during a session (in 1935, 1952, 1970, 1984 and 1990). The death of Armand
LaVergne in 1935 is the only instance of the death of a Deputy Speaker while in office. [332]
A successor was chosen four sitting days after news of his death was brought to the House. [333]
J.A. Dion was appointed a judge in 1952 and resigned as a Member, thus creating a vacancy in the Deputy
Speakership. [334]
Hugh Faulkner was appointed a Parliamentary Secretary in 1970, and his resignation was communicated to the
House by the Speaker. [335]
Lloyd Francis, selected as Deputy Speaker at the opening of the Thirty-Second Parliament in 1980, [336]
vacated that office by virtue of his election to the Speakership following the resignation of Speaker
Sauvé in the Second Session of the Parliament. [337]
In the latter three cases, the new Deputy Speaker was selected on the day on which the House was informed
of the change in status of the Members. A less typical case is that of Deputy Speaker Marcel Danis, who was
appointed to the Cabinet on February 23, 1990. Following his Cabinet appointment, he did not preside over
the House, but remained in office as Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Whole until May 15,
1990, when his official resignation was communicated to the House and a new Deputy Speaker was elected. [338]
The offices of Deputy Chairman and Assistant Deputy Chairman of Committees of the Whole may be filled
“at the commencement of every session, or from time to time as necessity may arise”. [339]
Thus, a vacancy during a session would not necessarily be filled immediately, or at all. For example, after
the initial appointment of a Deputy Chairman of Committees of the Whole for a single session in 1938, the
post was left vacant until 1947. [340]
In December 1967, the Deputy Chairman of Committees of the Whole, Maurice Rinfret, died, and the position
remained vacant for the balance of the session. However, since 1974 (First Session, Thirtieth Parliament),
the House has operated with the full complement of Presiding Officers as the statutes and rules provide,
and current practice has been that when such vacancies arise they are filled without undue delay. [341]
Vacancies during a session in the offices of Deputy Chairman and Assistant Deputy Chairman have occurred
for various reasons. In more than one case, a Member serving as Deputy Chairman or Assistant Deputy
Chairman was appointed to fill a vacancy among the other Presiding Officers, [342]
or accepted an appointment of another kind. [343]
In 1961, the Prime Minister informed the House that the Deputy Chairman of Committees of the Whole wished
to be replaced, due to illness, and immediately moved a motion naming a successor. [344]
In 1996, the Deputy Chairman was appointed to the Senate and resigned as a Member, thus vacating the Deputy
Chairmanship. [345]
On other occasions, vacancies have occurred as the result of resignations. [346]
In some cases where the Deputy Chairman of Committees of the Whole stepped down, the fact of the
resignation was announced to the House by the Speaker. [347]
The selection of a particular individual as Chairman, Deputy Chairman or Assistant Deputy Chairman has been
renewed from Parliament to Parliament or from session to session as the case may be. [348]
It has also happened that individuals have moved from one presiding officer position to another, either
through filling vacancies during a session or through selection to other positions in a new session of
Parliament; however, there is little evidence to suggest that this experience has created a path to the
Speakership. Of the 33 Speakers who have occupied the Chair since Confederation, eight had prior experience
as a Presiding Officer in the House of Commons. [349]