Recall of the House During an Adjournment
When the House stands adjourned during a session, the rules provide the means by which the House may be
recalled prior to the date originally specified, to transact business as if it had been duly adjourned to
the earlier date. [88]
The decision to recall is taken by the Speaker, after consultation with the government and once the Speaker
is satisfied that the public interest would be served by an earlier meeting of the House. [89]
The rule makes no reference to criteria other than the public interest. Should the Speaker be satisfied
of the need for the recall, the rule further provides for the Speaker to give notice of the day and hour
of the resumption of the session. Normally, the Speaker requests a period of time following the notice
(the practice is a minimum of 48 hours) in which to notify Members individually and allow for their travel
time. Depending on the circumstances, a Special Order Paper and Notice Paper (in addition to the
regular Order Paper and Notice Paper) may be published at the request of the government. [90]
For the first 70 years after Confederation, the practice was to end the session by prorogation rather than
have a lengthy adjournment. [91]
In 1940, however, given the uncertainty of the wartime situation, it was deemed advisable to adjourn rather
than to prorogue, in order to enable the House to reconvene quickly if necessary. The House adopted a
motion to adjourn which empowered the Speaker to recall the House if, after consultation with the
government, it was concluded that it was in the public interest to do so. [92]
Similar motions were adopted in subsequent sessions and became routine when the House adjourned for an
extended period of time.
The first recall under these circumstances occurred in 1944, when the government wished to apprise the House
of the situation arising from the resignation of the Minister of National Defence. [93]
Several other recall took place before 1982, [94]
at which time the practice was codified by the adoption of a Standing Order worded similarly to the
adjournment motions used before 1982. [95]
The rule further provides that should the Speaker be unable to act due to illness or other reason, deputy
presiding officers may act in the Speaker’s place for the purpose of this particular Standing Order.
Consultation between the Speaker and the government regarding a recall of the House usually begins with a
government request made in writing to the Speaker, setting out reasons why it is in the public interest to
recall the House. The request may be made at any time. [96]
When a decision is taken to recall the House, the Speaker advises the Clerk of the House and asks that
the necessary steps be taken to resume the session. The Clerk then ensures that all is made ready for the
resumption of the sittings.
House officials are responsible for the logistics of the recall, including informing the Members and
publishing the Order Paper and Notice Paper (and a Special Order Paper and Notice Paper,
if the government so requests). [97]
Cancelling Recall Order
No mechanism exists to cancel an order to recall the House. However, on one occasion, after receiving such
a request from all the recognized parties in the House, the Speaker issued a formal statement in which he
cancelled an earlier notice for recall. The original notice was given on June 26, 1992, for the House to
meet on July 15, 1992; the notice of cancellation was given on July 11, 1992, and tabled on September 8,
1992, at which time the Speaker made a statement to the House. [98]
Tabling of Pertinent Correspondence by Speaker
It is usual practice, when the House reassembles following a recall, for the Speaker to inform the House
of the reason for the recall, the various steps taken to effect the recall and, if a Special Order
Paper and Notice Paper was requested, the steps taken for its publication and circulation. [99]
Since 1980, the Speaker has also tabled correspondence received from the government concerning the recall. [100]
Order of Business Upon Resumption of Sitting
A recall has no effect on the ordinary daily order of business of the House. When the House first meets
following a recall, Routine Proceedings, Question Period and other proceedings are all held in the usual
manner depending on the time of meeting of the House, which is set out in the notice of recall. [101]
Unless a motion to adjourn to a later date is adopted, or the session is ended by prorogation, the House
merely continues on subsequent days with its regular sittings as if it had been adjourned to the recall
date. In such cases, the House may well operate outside the parliamentary calendar for some time, as it
did in 1987 when the House was recalled in early August and did not again adjourn for an extended period
until the December break, which was in accordance with the calendar. [102]