|
Q-1365
|
Tuesday, June 16, 2026 |
With regard to the Small Craft Harbours Program administered by Fisheries and Oceans Canada, broken down by each fiscal year since 2015-16: (a) what was the total amount of funding allocated and expended under the program; (b) what amount was allocated and expended in each province and territory; (c) what amount was allocated and expended in each Small Craft Harbours regional office or administrative region; (d) what were the names and locations of all harbours that received funding, and what amount was provided to each harbour; (e) what was the purpose of each funding allocation, including, but not limited to, repair, maintenance, dredging, divestiture, climate adaptation, or new construction projects; (f) what criteria, metrics, formulae, scoring systems, risk assessments, asset-condition indices, socioeconomic considerations, fisheries-related considerations, or other factors were used by the department to determine funding allocations and project prioritization; (g) what methodology was used to determine regional and provincial funding; (h) what criteria were used to rank, prioritize, approve, defer, or reject harbour infrastructure projects; (i) what weighting, if any, was assigned to factors such as asset condition, safety risks, commercial fishing activity, economic impact, harbour utilization, climate resilience, Indigenous participation, and emergency repair requirements; and (j) have the criteria or methodology changed since 2015, and, if so, what changes were made, when were they made, and why were they made? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1219
|
Monday, May 25, 2026 |
With regard to the review conducted by Transport Canada following the fatal recreational vehicle accident in July 2024 near West Perth, Ontario, involving a child and the operation of a slide-out ("bump-out") mechanism, and subsequent actions taken by Transport Canada: (a) on what date did Transport Canada initiate and complete its review into the safety of recreational vehicle slide-out mechanisms; (b) what data, incident reports, or stakeholder consultations were considered as part of this review, including any input from manufacturers, safety experts, or the families affected; (c) what were the key findings and conclusions of the review, specifically regarding the safety risks posed by slide-out mechanisms; (d) why did Transport Canada determine that no regulatory changes or mandatory safety standards were required following the review; (e) why did Transport Canada decide to rely on voluntary compliance by recreational vehicle manufacturers rather than implementing mandatory safety requirements; (f) what steps is Transport Canada taking to inform recreational vehicle owners and the public about the potential hazards associated with slide-out mechanisms; (g) which manufacturers have been notified of the potential hazards, and what response, including notification of the implementation of voluntary safety improvements, did Transport Canada receive in response from each manufacturer; (h) has Transport Canada conducted or commissioned any risk assessments quantifying the likelihood of similar incidents occurring in the future, and, if so, what were the findings; (i) is Transport Canada planning to issue a recall, safety bulletin, or mandatory retrofit requirement for existing recreational vehicles equipped with similar slide-out mechanisms, and, if so, what is being planned; (j) if the answer to (i) is no, why not; and (k) did Transport Canada engage with or consult any United States authorities, including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, regarding the safety of recreational vehicle slide-out (bump-out) mechanisms and, if so, (i) on what dates did such engagement occur, and what information was exchanged, (ii) what differences were identified between Canadian and United-States regulatory approaches, standards, or enforcement practices, (iii) how did those differences inform Transport Canada's decision not to implement mandatory regulatory changes? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-985
|
Monday, March 23, 2026 |
With regard to Farm Credit Canada and client and employee satisfaction: (a) what metrics are used to measure client satisfaction, including how Net Promoter Score is determined; (b) what were the annual Net Promoter Scores for each of the past 10 years, and how have these results impacted Farm Credit Canada's portfolio; (c) what was Farm Credit Canada's score from Aon Hewitt's top employer rankings, broken down by year for the past 10 years; (d) when was the last Pay Package Comparators review completed, and what were the results of the comparative review, broken down by the (i) lower job bands, (ii) median job bands, (iii) executive job bands; (e) what metrics does Farm Credit Canada use to measure employee satisfaction, and (i) what are the results from the most recent three surveys, (ii) how has the feedback been actioned, (iii) how are anonymous survey results tracked and investigated; (f) what analyses have been conducted regarding the impact of changes in executive leadership structure on (i) client satisfaction, (ii) employee engagement, (iii) industry outcomes, and what are the findings of these analyses; (g) has Farm Credit Canada, or any employee, attempted to manipulate the public perception of the agency on websites, like Glassdoor and Indeed, by generating fake positive reviews, and, if so, how; and (h) has Farm Credit Canada, or any employee, used artificial intelligence software or any software to scan negative reviews on any websites, like Glassdoor and Indeed, in an attempt to reveal the identity of former employees by matching reviews with internal communications, and, if so, how? |
Answered |
Friday, May 8, 2026 |
|
Q-984
|
Monday, March 23, 2026 |
With regard to Farm Credit Canada and concerns over the change in prioritization attention to western and eastern regions: (a) what have been the annual budgets for Client Service Representatives and Regional Managers since 2019; (b) what cuts have been made to the budgets for Client Service Representatives and Regional Managers since January 1, 2023, broken down by (i) travel budget cuts, (ii) training budget cuts; and (c) what analysis, if any, has been conducted regarding regional differences between Eastern and Western Canada, broken down by province, for (i) lending rates, (ii) loan terms, (iii) service levels, (iv) credit approvals? |
Answered |
Friday, May 8, 2026 |
|
Q-965
|
Thursday, March 19, 2026 |
With regard to governance and human resources oversight at Farm Credit Canada since January 1, 2023: (a) what is the current organizational structure for human resources oversight, including whether the Chief Executive Officer has held concurrent responsibility for human resources functions; (b) what policies are in place to manage conflicts of interest when complaints concern senior executives; (c) how are complaints regarding the Chief Executive Officer or other senior executives received, assessed and investigated; (d) how many complaints, grievances, ethics reports or disclosures have been submitted since January 1, 2023, broken down by (i) type of complaint, (ii) whether the subject was a senior executive, (iii) whether an investigation was initiated, (iv) the outcome of the investigation, if any; (e) how many disclosures have been made under the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act, since January 1, 2023, and how many involved senior leadership; (f) how many employees, past or present, have been asked to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements since 2018, broken down by year and by reason for the need of a Non-Disclosure Agreement; (g) do any of the Non-Disclosure Agreements prevent past or present employees from filing complaints with the Canadian Human Rights Commission; (h) what measures are in place to ensure employees are protected from reprisal when submitting anonymous surveys, ethics complaints or disclosures; (i) what policies govern the protection of employee medical information and client information during internal meetings; and (j) has any external review, audit or independent assessment been conducted regarding workplace culture, ethics compliance or executive conduct, and, if so, what were the findings? |
Answered |
Wednesday, May 6, 2026 |
|
Q-964
|
Thursday, March 19, 2026 |
With regard to Farm Credit Canada since January 1, 2023: (a) what is the breakdown of executive and director-level employees by (i) province of primary residence, (ii) designated work location, (iii) those whose position is based at the corporate headquarters in Regina; (b) how many executive or director-level employees reside outside of the province of Saskatchewan; (c) outside of official work trips, how many executive or director-level employees have worked remotely from a location outside of Canada, if any, and what is the breakdown by location; (d) what policies govern executive remote work arrangements and physical presence at headquarters; (e) what is the total amount spent annually on executive travel, broken down for each traveler by fiscal year and type of expenditure; and (f) what was the total amount spent on consultants, broken down by (i) fiscal year, (ii) competitive versus non-competitive contracts, (iii) contracts related to sustainability initiatives, (iv) contracts with people who were previously personnel or who have had a business relationship with the Chief Executive Officer or any other senior executive, (v) contracts with businesses who are owned or operated by individuals who were previous personnel or who have had a business relationship with the Chief Executive Officer or any other senior executive? |
Answered |
Wednesday, May 6, 2026 |
|
Q-780
|
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
With regard to the National Emergency Strategic Stockpile : (a) for each fiscal year from 2022-23 to 2025-26, what costs has the government incurred to store personal protective equipment that was expired or could no longer be deployed, and how much of those costs were paid to third-party logistics providers; (b) what is the government's explanation as to why it continues to incur millions of dollars annually in warehousing costs for expired personal protective equipment; (c) what are the government's plans for the approximately 64 million pieces of expired personal protective equipment that it disclosed to the Standing Committee on Health, including why it hasn't disposed of the units to date; (d) has the government been made aware of falsified lab reports for gowns and other personal protective equipment that were submitted in conjunction with the National Emergency Strategic Stockpile during the COVID-19 pandemic between 2020 and 2023, and, if so, what is its response; (e) what comparison has the Public Health Agency of Canada conducted between the operational readiness of the National Emergency Strategic Stockpile immediately prior to COVID-19 (January 2020) and its readiness as of January 2026, including deployable personal protective equipment volume and time-to-surge during an emergency; (f) what risk assessment has the government conducted to ensure that the same foreign supply-chain failures will not reoccur in a future emergency; and (g) how is the government respecting its ethical procurement obligations under Bill S-211, An Act to enact the Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act and to amend the Customs Tariff, in relation to procurement for the stockpile, including, (i) how many personal protective equipment suppliers to the National Emergency Strategic Stockpile have been flagged through open-source human rights reporting as having potential links to forced labour, (ii) what due-diligence steps were taken prior to renewing or issuing call-ups to those suppliers, (iii) how it reconciles those procurement decisions with its stated commitments to responsible and ethical supply chains? |
Answered |
Friday, March 13, 2026 |
|
Q-779
|
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
With regard to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Treasury Board appropriations, and the government's response to parliamentary committee recommendations: (a) what is the current process by which Treasury Board approved appropriations for Canada's obligations to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission flow through Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and on what legal, policy, and administrative basis does this arrangement continue; (b) why has the government not corrected the conflict of interest noted in the 11th report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, which was adopted during the 1st session of the 44th Parliament, that found that, Fisheries and Oceans Canada's dual role as both the funder and the delivery agent of the Sea Lamprey Control Program represents a conflict of interest; (c) what accountability mechanisms are currently in place to ensure that funds flowing through Fisheries and Oceans Canada are not influenced by the department's operational role in delivering the Sea Lamprey Control Program; (d) why has the government not yet implemented recommendation number eight of the standing committee's report, which calls for transferring responsibility for the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, including the flow of Treasury Board appropriations, from Fisheries and Oceans Canada to Global Affairs Canada; (e) what is the timeline for implementing the transfer in (d); and (f) what assessment has the government made of the risks posed by not yet implementing recommendation number eight, including risks to (i) Canada's compliance with its international treaty obligations, (ii) the credibility of Canada's governance of shared Great Lakes resources, (iii) the effective and timely delivery of sea lamprey control activities? |
Answered |
Friday, March 13, 2026 |
