|
Q-680
|
Monday, December 8, 2025 |
With regard to the expansion of tax credits to federal investment and other policy support measures to encourage major investments in carbon capture, utilization and storage, including the Pathways Alliance, and enhanced oil recovery to provide the certainty needed to attract additional domestic and foreign sources of capital:
(a) what is the impact of this decision on the modelling of greenhouse gas emissions projections, broken down by province, for each emissions projection scenario and for every milestone year between 2026 and 2050;
(b) what other policy support measures are being considered; (c) what are the impacts of each proposed measure, including enhanced oil recovery; (d) what are the public costs of these measures; (e) what are the environmental impacts (greenhouse gases, biodiversity, water, etc.);
(f) what are the health effects of these measures (economic costs, health problems, morbidity, premature deaths, etc.);
(g) what are the other effects of these measures; and
(h) as regards all the documentation relating to this same decision, including the scientific advice, briefing notes, studies and memoranda used by or provided to the Privy Council Office, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, the Department of Finance, Cabinet and the Prime Minister’s Office, what are their details, including (i) the date, (ii) the sender, (iii) the type of document, (iv) the title of the document, (v) a summary of the message’s content? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
|
Q-679
|
Monday, December 8, 2025 |
With regard to the government's decision to work collaboratively with Alberta to implement carbon pricing for large Alberta emitters in both the oil and gas and electricity sectors and ramp up to a minimum effective credit price of $130 per tonne of emissions:
(a) what are the proposed effective dates for a minimum effective credit price of $130 per tonne of emissions;
(b) what is the price trajectory to $130 per tonne of emissions and beyond, through 2050;
(c) what is the effective cost per tonne of carbon emissions paid in Alberta for each of the major emitting sectors (on average for each sector) for each year that the price has been in effect to date and the projections to 2050;
(d) what financial mechanisms are being considered “to ensure both parties maintain their respective commitments over the long term to provide certainty to industry, and to achieve the intended emissions reductions”;
(e) what is the impact of this decision on the modelling of greenhouse gas emission projections, for each emission projection scenario and for all milestone years from 2026 to 2050 and what are the details, including (i) the different estimated costs per tonne for each year from 2026 to 2050, (ii) the economic impacts for the different costs per tonne, (iii) the environmental impacts (green house gases, biodiversity, water, etc.), (iv) the health impacts (economic costs, health problems, morbidity, premature deaths, etc.), (v) any other impacts;
(f) for all documentation related to this decision, including scientific opinions, briefing notes, studies and briefs used by or provided to the Privy Council Office, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, the Department of Finance Canada, the Cabinet and the Prime Minister's Office, what are details, including (i) the date, (ii) the sender, (iii) the type of document, (iv) the title of the document, (v) a summary of the content of the message? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
|
Q-678
|
Monday, December 8, 2025 |
With regard to the Ksi Lisims liquefied natural gas project on the coast of British Columbia:
(a) what are the projections, in tonnes, of greenhouse gas emissions from the project
(i) in Canada, annually and cumulatively over the life of the project, from the construction phase to the end of the project's life,
(ii) internationally, annually and cumulatively over the life of the project, from the construction phase to the end of the project's life;
(b) for all internal government documentation assessing the impact of the Ksi Lisims project on
(i) the project's greenhouse gas emissions,
(ii) Canada's 2030 greenhouse gas reduction target,
(iii) public health,
(iv) the economy, including economic risks, gas prices and energy costs (for example, electricity costs and transportation costs) for Canadian consumers,
(v) gas production and the necessary capacity of gas transportation infrastructure to this terminal, what are the details, including the date, the sender, the type of document, the title of the document, a summary of the content of the message;
(c) what are the details of the national security review of the investments of Western LNG, partners in the Ksi Lisims project, including (i) the date, (ii) the sender, (iii) the type of document, (iv) the title of the document, (v) a summary of the content of the message; and
(d) for any documentation assessing the interests of the United-States in Western LNG, a partner in the Ksi Lisims project, what are the details, including (i) the date, (ii) the sender, (iii) the type of document, (iv) the title of the document, (v) a summary of the message's content? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
|
Q-78
|
Monday, June 2, 2025 |
With regard to the approval rate for French-speaking international students: how many study permit applications, other than extension applications, has Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada processed since January 1, 2023, broken down by (i) country of residence, (ii) number of people, (iii) year? |
Answered |
Monday, September 15, 2025 |
|
Q-77
|
Monday, June 2, 2025 |
With regard to the five-year lease that Public Services and Procurement Canada contracted with ILG LTÉE (Pierre Guay) in August 2021, to consolidate previous leases and retrofit two existing buildings (337 and 339 Guay Road, Lacolle):
(a) did the lease, which was to run from April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2027, end with the closure of Roxham Road, at midnight on March 25, 2023;
(b) if the new five-year lease contracted with ILG LTÉE did not end with the closure of Roxham Road on March 25, 2023, when did it end;
(c) if the new five-year lease contracted with ILG LTÉE did not end as of November 6, 2024, when will it end;
(d) if the new five-year lease contracted with ILG LTÉE did not end on March 25, 2023, is it possible to obtain the total amounts paid to ILG LTÉE since that date; and
(e) if the new five-year lease contracted with ILG LTÉE did not end on March 25, 2023, is it possible to obtain the total amounts that remain to be paid to ILG LTÉE until the end of the contract? |
Answered |
Monday, September 15, 2025 |
