Skip to main content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Order Paper

No. 26

Monday, September 22, 2025

11:00 a.m.


Order of Business

Government Orders — at 11:00 a.m.

Statements by Members — at 2:00 p.m.

Oral Questions — not later than 2:15 p.m. until 3:00 p.m.

Daily Routine of Business — at 3:00 p.m.

Tabling of Documents

Introduction of Government Bills

Statements by Ministers

Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations

Presenting Reports from Committees

Introduction of Private Members’ Bills

No. 1
June 10, 2025 — Yvan Baker (Etobicoke Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish Somali Heritage Month”.
No. 2
June 18, 2025 — Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Customs Act and the Customs Tariff (forced labour and child labour)”.
No. 3
September 11, 2025 — Don Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (voting age)”.
No. 4
September 11, 2025 — Don Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — Bill entitled “An Act to enact the Canada Pharmacare Act”.
No. 5
September 11, 2025 — Ziad Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the establishment and award of a Living Donor Recognition Medal”.
No. 6
September 15, 2025 — Sukh Dhaliwal (Surrey Newton) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Health Act (accountability)”.
No. 7
September 16, 2025 — Dane Lloyd (Parkland) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Prisons and Reformatories Act”.
No. 8
September 16, 2025 — Rachael Thomas (Lethbridge) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (consecutive sentences for sexual offences)”.
No. 9
September 16, 2025 — Jeff Kibble (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (increasing parole ineligibility)”.
No. 10
September 17, 2025 — Kelly DeRidder (Kitchener Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code, to make related amendments to the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act”.
No. 11
September 17, 2025 — Xavier Barsalou-Duval (Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Multiculturalism Act (non-application in Quebec)”.
No. 12
September 17, 2025 — Viviane Lapointe (Sudbury) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (restitution orders)”.
No. 13
September 18, 2025 — Jonathan Rowe (Terra Nova—The Peninsulas) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Fisheries Act (Atlantic groundfish fisheries)”.
No. 14
September 18, 2025 — Arpan Khanna (Oxford) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Department of Justice Act”.
No. 15
September 18, 2025 — Tatiana Auguste (Terrebonne) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish a national strategy respecting flood and drought forecasting”.
No. 16
September 19, 2025 — Kerry Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (parole review)”.
No. 17
September 19, 2025 — Patrick Weiler (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend The Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 and the Wrecked, Abandoned and Hazardous Vessels Act”.
No. 18
September 19, 2025 — Marianne Dandurand (Compton—Stanstead) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the Spectrum Policy Framework for Canada”.

First Reading of Senate Public Bills

Motions

Motions to concur in committee reports:
Debate — limited to three hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 1
September 11, 2025 — Dan Albas (Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 2
September 11, 2025 — Gabriel Hardy (Montmorency—Charlevoix) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 3
September 11, 2025 — Gabriel Hardy (Montmorency—Charlevoix) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 4
September 11, 2025 — Michael Barrett (Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands—Rideau Lakes) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 5
September 11, 2025 — Michael Barrett (Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands—Rideau Lakes) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 6
September 11, 2025 — Matt Strauss (Kitchener South—Hespeler) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Thursday, June 19, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 18, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 7
September 11, 2025 — Cathay Wagantall (Yorkton—Melville) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 8
September 11, 2025 — Cathay Wagantall (Yorkton—Melville) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 9
September 11, 2025 — Philip Lawrence (Northumberland—Clarke) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 10
September 11, 2025 — Kelly McCauley (Edmonton West) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 11
September 11, 2025 — Kelly McCauley (Edmonton West) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
No. 12
September 11, 2025 — Tamara Jansen (Cloverdale—Langley City) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 13
September 11, 2025 — Tamara Jansen (Cloverdale—Langley City) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
No. 14
September 11, 2025 — Helena Konanz (Similkameen—South Okanagan—West Kootenay) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Thursday, June 19, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 18, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 15
September 15, 2025 — Marie-Hélène Gaudreau (Laurentides—Labelle) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 16
September 15, 2025 — Dan Mazier (Riding Mountain) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Thursday, June 19, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 18, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 17
September 15, 2025 — Dan Albas (Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna) — That the third report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 18
September 15, 2025 — Dan Albas (Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna) — That the fourth report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 19
September 15, 2025 — Dan Albas (Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna) — That the fifth report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 20
September 16, 2025 — Xavier Barsalou-Duval (Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 21
September 16, 2025 — Xavier Barsalou-Duval (Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères) — That the third report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 22
September 16, 2025 — Xavier Barsalou-Duval (Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères) — That the fourth report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 23
September 16, 2025 — Xavier Barsalou-Duval (Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères) — That the fifth report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 24
September 16, 2025 — Philip Lawrence (Northumberland—Clarke) — That the third report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 25
September 16, 2025 — Philip Lawrence (Northumberland—Clarke) — That the fourth report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 26
September 16, 2025 — Philip Lawrence (Northumberland—Clarke) — That the fifth report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 27
September 16, 2025 — Kelly Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 28
September 16, 2025 — Kelly Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
No. 29
September 16, 2025 — Leslyn Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 30
September 16, 2025 — Leslyn Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) — That the third report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 31
September 16, 2025 — Leslyn Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) — That the fourth report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 32
September 16, 2025 — Leslyn Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) — That the fifth report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 33
September 16, 2025 — Blake Richards (Airdrie—Cochrane) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 34
September 16, 2025 — Blake Richards (Airdrie—Cochrane) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 35
September 18, 2025 — Jeremy Patzer (Swift Current—Grasslands—Kindersley) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 36
September 18, 2025 — Jeremy Patzer (Swift Current—Grasslands—Kindersley) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
No. 37
September 18, 2025 — Jagsharan Singh Mahal (Edmonton Southeast) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Science and Research, presented on Monday, September 15, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 14, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 38
September 18, 2025 — Jagsharan Singh Mahal (Edmonton Southeast) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Science and Research, presented on Monday, September 15, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 14, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 39
September 18, 2025 — Tony Baldinelli (Niagara Falls—Niagara-on-the-Lake) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Science and Research, presented on Monday, September 15, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 14, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 40
September 18, 2025 — Tony Baldinelli (Niagara Falls—Niagara-on-the-Lake) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Science and Research, presented on Monday, September 15, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 14, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 41
September 18, 2025 — Clifford Small (Central Newfoundland) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Tuesday, September 16, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 15, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 42
September 18, 2025 — Vincent Ho (Richmond Hill South) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Science and Research, presented on Monday, September 15, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 14, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 43
September 18, 2025 — Vincent Ho (Richmond Hill South) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Science and Research, presented on Monday, September 15, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 14, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 44
September 18, 2025 — Rhonda Kirkland (Oshawa) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Wednesday, September 17, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 16, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 45
September 18, 2025 — Frank Caputo (Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Wednesday, September 17, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 16, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 46
September 18, 2025 — John Brassard (Barrie South—Innisfil) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 47
September 18, 2025 — John Brassard (Barrie South—Innisfil) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 48
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 49
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
No. 50
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Science and Research, presented on Monday, September 15, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 14, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 51
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Science and Research, presented on Monday, September 15, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 14, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 52
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Tuesday, September 16, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 15, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 53
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Wednesday, September 17, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 16, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 54
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 55
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 56
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 57
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the third report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 58
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the fourth report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 59
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the fifth report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 60
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 61
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 62
September 19, 2025 — Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Thursday, June 19, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 18, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 63
September 19, 2025 — Michael Cooper (St. Albert—Sturgeon River) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 64
September 19, 2025 — Michael Cooper (St. Albert—Sturgeon River) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 20, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 19, 2025, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 65
September 19, 2025 — Chak Au (Richmond Centre—Marpole) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Wednesday, September 17, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 16, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 66
September 19, 2025 — Jason Groleau (Beauce) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Tuesday, September 16, 2025, be concurred in.
No. 67
September 19, 2025 — Jason Groleau (Beauce) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Tuesday, September 16, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 15, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 68
September 19, 2025 — Jason Groleau (Beauce) — That the third report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Tuesday, September 16, 2025, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 15, 2026, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.

Presenting Petitions

Questions on the Order Paper

Those questions not appearing in the list have been answered, withdrawn or made into orders for return.

Government Orders