House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 17 Tuesday, June 17, 2025 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
| June 16, 2025 — The Minister of Public Safety — Bill entitled “An Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts”. |
| Recommendation |
| (Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2)) |
| Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts”. |
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
| June 16, 2025 — Gord Johns (Courtenay—Alberni) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Marine Liability Act (national strategy respecting pollution caused by shipping container spills)”. |
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
Questions |
|
| Q-1872 — June 16, 2025 — Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill) — With regard to the removal of persons by the Canada Border Services Agency, since January 1, 2016: (a) how many persons subject to removal have departed or been removed from Canada, broken down by year; (b) what is the number of 'high-priority foreign nationals' subject to removal orders on grounds of serious inadmissibility, broken down by year and relevant Immigration and Refugee Protection Act section on inadmissibility; (c) of those in (b), how many were actually removed from Canada, broken down by year and relevant Immigration and Refugee Protection Act section on inadmissibility; (d) how many persons who are subject to removal orders on grounds of serious inadmissibility have not yet been removed, broken down by year, reason for non-removal, and relevant Immigration and Refugee Protection Act section on inadmissibility; and (e) regarding those in (d), how does the Canada Border Services Agency plan to find and remove these persons from Canada? |
| Q-1882 — June 16, 2025 — Scott Reid (Lanark—Frontenac) — With regard to CORCAN agriculture and agribusiness spending since fiscal year 2015-16: (a) what is the total amount of operational spending related to CORCAN agriculture and agribusiness, broken down by fiscal year; (b) what is the total amount of capital spending related to CORCAN agriculture and agribusiness, broken down by fiscal year; (c) what is the total amount of revenue related to CORCAN agriculture and agribusiness, broken down by fiscal year; (d) what is the total amount of operational spending related to CORCAN penitentiary farms, broken down by fiscal year; (e) what is the total amount of capital spending related to CORCAN penitentiary farms, broken down by fiscal year; (f) what is the total amount of revenue related to CORCAN penitentiary farms, broken down by fiscal year; (g) what is the total amount of operational spending related to CORCAN penitentiary farms, broken down by fiscal year and institution; (h) what is the total amount of capital spending related to CORCAN penitentiary farms, broken down by fiscal year and institution; and (i) what is the total amount of revenue related to CORCAN penitentiary farms, broken down by fiscal year and institution? |
| Q-1892 — June 16, 2025 — Scott Reid (Lanark—Frontenac) — With regard to expenditures for reestablishing the Correctional Service of Canada’s prison farms at Collins Bay and Joyceville Institutions: (a) since 2015, broken down by fiscal year, what is the total amount, including taxes, paid to (i) Taylor Hazell Architects, (ii) WSP Canada Engineering, (iii) Tacoma Engineers, (iv) Lashley & Associates, (v) Norwell Dairy Systems, (vi) Eastern Crop Doctor, (vii) Advanced Grain Handling Services, (viii) McCann Farm Automation, (ix) Hart Acre Grains, (x) Willows Agriservices, (xi) A et R Boulet, (xii) Chris Rots Enterprises, (xiii) St. Lawrence Veterinary Services, (xiv) Colliers Project Leaders, (xv) Pen Farm Herd Co-Op, (xvi) Dairy Farmers of Ontario, (xvii) Strong Bros Construction; (b) since 2015, broken down by fiscal year, what is the total amount, including taxes, spent on (i) veterinary services, (ii) project management services, (iii) construction site security services, (iv) pesticide application services, (v) fertilizer application services, (vi) combining and trucking services, (vii) silage services, (viii) procurement services, (ix) engineering and architectural design services, (x) translation services, (xi) legal services; (c) since 2018, what is the total number of beehives purchased, the total amount spent on beehives, and the current number of beehives at each site; (d) of the total number of beehives purchased in (c), how many beehives were purchased from Correctional Service Canada and CORCAN employees, and at what cost; (e) since 2018, what is the total number of beef cattle purchased, the total amount spent on beef cattle, and the current number of beef cattle at each site; (f) since 2018, what is the total number of dairy cattle purchased, the total amount spent on dairy cattle, and the current number of dairy cattle at each site; (g) of the total number of dairy cattle purchased in (f), how many cattle were purchased from members of Correctional Service Canada’s Prison Farm Advisory Panel and the Pen Farm Herd Co-Op, and at what cost; (h) since 2018, broken down by fiscal year, what is the total amount, including taxes, spent on (i) farm staff salaries and benefits, (ii) offender pay for farm work, (iii) farm equipment, (iv) demolitions and renovations at Collins Bay Institution, (v) demolitions and renovations at Joyceville Institution, (vi) new construction at Collins Bay Institution, (vii) new construction at Joyceville Institution excluding the dairy cattle barn; (i) what is the total amount, including taxes, spent on the dairy cattle barn at Joyceville Institution, including construction, modifications, procurement fees, consultancy fees (design, engineering, geotechnical, environmental, topographic, etc.), travel and meals, contingencies, project management, contract administration, and dairy equipment and technology for the cow barn; (j) on what date was final completion of the dairy cattle barn achieved and on what date was the barn handed over to Correctional Service Canada by the contractor; (k) since 2024, broken down by month, what have been the costs of operating the dairy cow barn, including staff salaries, veterinary care, feed and bedding, waste management, transportation, utilities, maintenance, internet fees, licensing, inspections, security and supervision; (l) since 2024, broken down by month, what have been the total revenues from the sale of milk; (m) since 2018, broken down by fiscal year, what have been the total revenues from the CORCAN Agribusiness business line, other than milk, broken down by the sale of (i) beef cattle, (ii) dairy cattle, (iii) crops, (iv) honey, (v) other (please identify); (n) since 2018, what is the total amount spent on offender vocational certifications directly related to the prison farm program; and (o) since 2015, including but not limited to all expenses identified in (a) to (n), what is the total amount spent to date on all aspects of reestablishing the penitentiary agriculture program, including planning, consultations, implementation, construction, operations, consultancy, procurement, inspections, assessments, regulatory fees and legal services? |
| Q-1902 — June 16, 2025 — Scott Reid (Lanark—Frontenac) — With regard to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada: for each of the president and vice-presidents, what are the details of all travel claim expenses in each instance of travel for which airfare expenses were greater than $0, incurred in each of 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, including, for each instance of applicable travel, (i) the travel start date, (ii) the travel end date, (iii) the total travel expense amount, (iv) the origin city, (v) the destination city, (vi) any cities or locations travelled to, other than the origin or destination cities, for which any expenses were claimed, including dates, times, and transportation method, (vii) the purpose of travel to each location, including the name, itinerary, and duration dates of any events, conferences, or other official gatherings attended, (viii) the dates, times, locations, purposes, and attendees for each meeting attended during travel, (ix) the total days of per diems claimed, (x) the daily per diem rate, (xi) the total amount of per diems claimed, (xii) the date, type, purpose, and amount spent on ground transportation, per use, (xiii) the location, per-night rate, and amount spent on accommodations, per night, (xiv) the daily itinerary items for each day of travel for which per diems were claimed? |
| Q-1912 — June 16, 2025 — Gord Johns (Courtenay—Alberni) — With regard to federal funding and the communities which comprise the federal electoral district of Courtenay—Alberni, between the 2005-06 and current fiscal year: (a) what are the federal funding and capital investments related to infrastructure, including direct transfers to the municipalities and First Nations, for the communities of (i) Tofino, (ii) Ucluelet, (iii) Port Alberni, (iv) Parksville, (v) Qualicum Beach, (vi) Cumberland, (vii) Courtenay, (viii) Deep Bay, (ix) Dashwood, (x) Royston, (xi) French Creek, (xii) Errington, (xiii) Coombs, (xiv) Nanoose Bay, (xv) Cherry Creek, (xvi) China Creek, (xvii) Bamfield, (xviii) Beaver Creek, (xix) Beaufort Range, (xx) Millstream, (xxi) Mt. Washington Ski Resort, broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, type of funding, funding opportunity or program and project; (b) what are the federal funding and capital investments related to infrastructure, transferred to (i) Comox Valley Regional District, (ii) Nanaimo Regional District, (iii) Alberni-Clayoquot Regional District, (iv) Powell River Regional District, broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, type of funding, funding opportunity or program and project; (c) what are the federal funding and capital investments related to infrastructure, transferred to the Island Trusts of (i) Hornby Island, (ii) Denman Island, (iii) Lasquetti Island, broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, type of funding, funding opportunity or program and project; and (d) what are the federal funding and capital investments related to infrastructure, transferred to (i) the Ahousaht First Nation, (ii) Hesquiaht First Nation, (iii) Huu-ay-aht First Nation, (iv) Hupacasath First Nation, (v) Tla-o-qui-aht First Nations, (vi) Toquaht First Nation, (vii) Tseshaht First Nation, (viii) Uchucklesaht First Nation, (ix) Ucluelet First Nation, broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, type of funding, funding opportunity or program and project? |
| Q-1922 — June 16, 2025 — Larry Brock (Brantford—Brant South—Six Nations) — With regard to ongoing lawsuits filed by the government against GC Strategies: what are the details of each, including (i) the date it was filed, (ii) the case name and number, (iii) where it was filed, (iv) the amount of damages sought, (v) the other parties named in the lawsuit, if applicable, (vi) the current status? |
| Q-1932 — June 16, 2025 — Grant Jackson (Brandon—Souris) — With regard to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, broken down by year: (a) since January 1, 2006, how many individuals who were credibly threatened by foreign actors have been contacted under the Royal Canadian Mounted Police's Duty to Warn policy; (b) how many of the individuals in (a) were members of Parliament; (c) how many of the members of Parliament were provided police protection; and (d) what was the cost of providing police protection to the individuals in (a)? |
| Q-1942 — June 16, 2025 — Vincent Ho (Richmond Hill South) — With regard to contracts entered into by the government relating to diversity, equity and inclusion services, between March 1, 2024, and June 1, 2025, and broken down by department or agency: (a) what is the total value of such contracts, broken down by type of service provided (policy development, training, guest speaker, fee, etc.); and (b) what are the details of each such contract, including the (i) vendor, (ii) date, (iii) amount or value, (iv) description of the goods or services, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid)? |
| Q-1952 — June 16, 2025 — Vincent Ho (Richmond Hill South) — With regard to grants and contributions entered into by the government that include references to diversity, equity and inclusion, in the agreement title, summary or description, since January 1, 2016: (a) what was the total value of such grants and contributions, broken down by year and by department, agency or other government entity; (b) what are the details of each such grant, including the (i) date, (ii) amount, (iii) title, (iv) recipient, (v) description; and (c) for each grant, what specific benefits, if any, have been achieved as a result? |
| Q-1962 — June 16, 2025 — Vincent Ho (Richmond Hill South) — With regard to grants provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, since 2020 and broken down by year: (a) what was the total number and value of grants provided; (b) what was the total number and value of grants available which were (i) available to all applicants on a strictly merit based assessment, (ii) restricted to those who self-identify as members of employment equity groups or certain minorities, broken down by type of restriction; and (c) what is the breakdown of (a) by the employment equity group or minority which was self-identified by the recipient? |
| Q-1972 — June 16, 2025 — James Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman) — With regard to the Royal Canadian Air Force: (a) how many filled fighter pilot positions were there in each year from 2020 to 2025; (b) how many fighter pilot positions in total were available to fill in each year from 2020 to 2025; (c) how many combat ready CF-18 flying positions were available to fill in each year from 2020 to 2025; (d) how many flying positions were available that were not combat ready (i.e. Squadron 410 Operational Training Unit (OTU), Squadron 419, wings, Aerospace Engineering Test Establishment, etc.) in each year from 2020 to 2025; (e) how many combat ready flying positions were available on each operational squadron and wing in each year from 2020 to 2025; (f) how many fighter pilot positions were available to fill each year from 2015 to 2025; (g) how many combat ready fighter pilots were released each year from 2020 to 2025; (h) how many fighter pilots in total were released annually from 2020 to 2025; (i) what are the estimated projections for 2025 to 2034 for (i) filled fighter pilot positions, (ii) fighter pilot positions, (iii) combat ready CF-18 and CF-35A flying positions, (iv) flying positions that are not combat ready, (v) combat ready flying positions available on each operational squadron and wing; (j) what is the estimated production rate of combat ready fighter pilots for each year from 2025 to 2034; (k) what is the estimated attrition rate for fighter pilots for each year from 2025 to 2034; (l) how many fighter pilot positions and personnel in the Royal Canadian Air Force are pre-Fighter Pilot Course students; (m) what is the Trained Effective Strength or operational functional point for fighter pilots; (n) what is the combat ready point for fighter pilots; (o) where and when does the combat ready point for fighter pilots take place; (p) what is the minimum, maximum, and mean time, in months, between recruitment and combat ready status for fighter pilots; (q) how many fighter pilots are greater than TIP 2 in CF-18 flying positions; (r) how many fighter pilots are two-ship leads in the CF-18 flying positions; (s) how many fighter pilots are four-ship leads in the CF-18 flying positions; (t) as of June 16, 2025, how many fighter pilots are (i) combat ready, (ii) non-combat ready, (iii) wingman, (iv) fighter electronic warfare instructors, (v) fighter weapons instructors; (u) are fighter pilot students (e.g. At Squadrons 410 and 419) included in fighter pilot positions Preferred Manning Level or Trained Effective Strength; and (v) how many fighter pilots are combat ready on the CF-35A? |
| Q-1982 — June 16, 2025 — James Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman) — With regard to national defence for the fiscal year 2025-26 and the Prime Minister's announcement on June 9, 2025, that stated that "This plan includes a cash increase of over $9 billion ($8.3 billion on an accrual basis) in defence investment this fiscal year (2025-26), bringing Canada's defence spending to 2% of gross domestic product": (a) how much total government spending is required to be defined as defence spending in order to reach 2% of gross domestic product; (b) what is the total planned budget for the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces; (c) what are the expenditures from other eligible government departments included in Canada's defence spending calculations, broken down by (i) department, (ii) type or category of expenditure, (iii) dollar value; (d) for the "new aircraft, armed vehicles, and ammunition" referenced in the Prime Minister's statement, what are the details, including the (i) type of new aircraft that will be acquired, (ii) budget for these aircrafts, (iii) type of new armed vehicles that will be acquired, (iv) budget for these armed vehicles; (e) is the budget for the new aircrafts and armed vehicles listed in (d) accounted for in the "cash increase of $9 billion", as referenced in the Department of National Defence backgrounder; (f) how much of the "cash increase of $9 billion" is accounted for in the Supplementary Estimates (A) tabled on June 9, 2025; and (g) what is the gross domestic product number used to calculate the Prime Minister's announcement regarding 2% defence spending? |
| Q-1992 — June 16, 2025 — James Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman) — With regard to the Prime Minister's announcement on June 9, 2025, that the government intends to expand "the reach, security mandate, and abilities of the Canadian Coast Guard" and the statement appearing in the National Post from the Prime Minister's Office spokesperson Emily Williams which stated that "the Prime Minister will soon initiate the process of moving the Canadian Coast Guard to the leadership of the Minister of National Defence": (a) when was the decision made to move the Canadian Coast Guard under the auspices of the Minister of National Defence; (b) was the Chief of the Defence Staff consulted on this decision, and, if so, when; (c) what is the total planned budget for the Canadian Coast Guard in the fiscal year 2025-26; (d) how much of the Canadian Coast Guard's total budget in the fiscal year 2025-26 will be considered as defence spending for the purposes of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's 2% of gross domestic product spending target; (e) is the government planning to arm current Canadian Coast Guard vessels; (f) if the answer to (e) is affirmative, what (i) armaments will be installed, (ii) additional training, if any, will be provided to Coast Guard personnel, (iii) is the planned budget for each; (g) aside from current projects to build new Coast Guard vessels as part of the National Shipbuilding Strategy, does the government intend to procure new vessels for the Canadian Coast Guard; and (h) if the answer to (g) is affirmative, what are the details, including the (i) type of vessel, (ii) planned budget, (iii) date of delivery, (iv) shipyard where they will be built? |
| Q-2002 — June 16, 2025 — Clifford Small (Central Newfoundland) — With regard to Marine Protected Areas, National Marine Conservation Areas and any other form of ocean protected areas that are now fully protected or at some stage of planning and to be considered part of the 30% by 2030 that Canada agreed to protect in compliance with the 15th Conference of the Parties Biodiversity Convention: (a) what are the details of all existing maps which show ocean protected areas and the reason it became a protected area, including which activities are permitted and which are prohibited currently within each area; (b) what are the details of the maps of all ocean protected areas at all stages of the establishing process, identifying for each stage which stakeholders were consulted; (c) what are the details of all memorandums of understandings or similar types of agreements signed at any stage of the establishment process; (d) for each protected area shown on the maps, what feature, aspect or species will be protected and how will the success of the objective be measured for each area identified; (e) what is the budget to fully implement all areas that are currently under consideration for protection and to fully implement the 30X30 initiative; (f) which groups, organizations, stakeholders, municipalities, environmental nongovernmental organizations or First Nations has the government received information about their advocacy for any ocean protected areas that are currently an Area of Interest, an area at any stage of the establishment process, or a fully established protected area, and what changes was each advocating for; (g) what will be the economic cost of stopping or curtailing renewable or nonrenewable resource industries from operating in areas that are identified but not yet fully implemented protected areas; (h) what will be the economic benefits in new gross domestic product for areas adjacent to proposed new protected areas, broken down by individual area and amount benefited by region; (i) which of the protected areas will have full or partial Indigenous governance; (j) what is date by which each new area is to become a fully established protected area; and (k) which of the proposed and established protected areas will be approved for installation of offshore wind turbines? |
| Q-2012 — June 16, 2025 — Clifford Small (Central Newfoundland) — With regard to Canadian fish stock assessments and stock advisory committees on commercial species, broken down by specific species: (a) what organizations, stakeholders, First Nations and environmental non-governmental organizations have observer status; (b) what organizations, stakeholders, First Nations and environmental non-governmental organizations have stakeholder status; (c) what is total length of time between when scientific and harvester data is received and when a quota decision is made; (d) what changes in science methodology have been made since 2015; (e) what changes in methodology to incorporate fish harvester logbook data into assessments, outlined by species, have been made since 2015; and (f) what are the net changes in the number of stakeholder seats and environmental non-governmental organizations seats at stock advisory, broken down by species and year since 2015? |
| Q-2022 — June 16, 2025 — Clifford Small (Central Newfoundland) — With regard to small craft harbours, since 2022: (a) which small craft harbours have applied for funding across Canada; (b) what are the details of each application, including the name of the harbour, the location, the scope and the budget; (c) what is the landed value of catch for each harbour in (b); (d) which harbours had projects approved and what is the scope and amount of federal funding for each; (e) what is the landed value of catch for each harbour in (d); (f) what percentage of each project is complete; (g) which projects are (i) within budget, (ii) over budget; (h) for each project which is over budget, what is the projected cost overrun and the reason for it being over budget; (i) which harbours have "shelf ready" tender documents for projects and what is the estimated cost of each project; (j) what is the landed value of catch for each of the harbours in (i); and (k) how much funding has been diverted from the regular small craft harbours budget, broken down by year and by province, to rebuild or repair as a result of damage from Hurricane Fiona? |
| Q-2032 — June 16, 2025 — Kelly Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — With regard to government expenditures on and sponsorship of the 2025 Formula 1 Grand Prix in Montreal, broken down by department or agency: (a) how much was spent sponsoring the event; (b) how many tickets were provided to the event as part of the sponsorship deal; (c) who was given and who used the tickets provided; (d) how much did the government spend purchasing tickets to the event and how many tickets were purchased; (e) for each ticket purchased in (d), who used the ticket; and (f) were any government members or officials gifted tickets to the event, and, if so, who received the tickets and from which entities? |
| Q-2042 — June 16, 2025 — Kelly Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — With regard to the attendance of the Minister of Transport and Internal Trade and the Minister of Finance and National Revenue at the 71st Bilderberg meeting in Stockholm: (a) did any support staff, either ministerial staff or government officials, travel with either of the ministers to Sweden, and, if so, who went; (b) for each minister, what was their itinerary from June 12 to 15, 2025, including who they met with and the topics of each meeting; (c) what was the agenda of the Bilderberg meeting; and (d) what agreements, achievements or advancements resulted from each minister's attendance and the meeting? |
| Q-2052 — June 16, 2025 — Gord Johns (Courtenay—Alberni) — With regard to the Canada Dental Care Plan, since the program’s inception: (a) what is the total number of approved applications; (b) how many seniors, persons with disabilities and children have benefited from the program; (c) what information is the government collecting regarding co-payments and denial of claims, preauthorization submissions and post-determination submissions; (d) how many claims, preauthorization submissions and post-determination submissions have been approved and denied; and (e) what information is communicated to clients when a claim, preauthorization submission or post-determination submission is rejected? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
| Main Estimates |
| OPPOSED VOTES |
| No. 1 — June 13, 2025 — The President of the Treasury Board — That Vote 1, in the amount of $253,537,041, under Department of Canadian Heritage — Operating expenditures, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, be concurred in. |
| June 13, 2025 — Rob Moore (Fundy Royal) — Notice of opposition to Vote 1, in the amount of $25,000, under Department of Canadian Heritage — Operating expenditures, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026. |
|
|
| No. 2 — June 13, 2025 — The President of the Treasury Board — That Vote 1, in the amount of $6,363,904,082, under Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation — Repayments to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, be concurred in. |
| June 13, 2025 — Rob Moore (Fundy Royal) — Notice of opposition to Vote 1, in the amount of $25,000, under Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation — Repayments to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026. |
|
|
| No. 3 — June 13, 2025 — The President of the Treasury Board — That Vote 1, in the amount of $2,223,420,163, under Department of Citizenship and Immigration — Operating expenditures, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, be concurred in. |
| June 13, 2025 — Rob Moore (Fundy Royal) — Notice of opposition to Vote 1, in the amount of $25,000, under Department of Citizenship and Immigration — Operating expenditures, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026. |
|
|
| No. 4 — June 16, 2025 — The President of the Treasury Board — That Vote 1, in the amount of $22,077,800, under Office of the Governor General's Secretary — Program expenditures and expenditures incurred for former Governors General, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, be concurred in. |
| June 16, 2025 — Christine Normandin (Saint-Jean) — Notice of opposition to Vote 1, in the amount of $22,077,800, under Office of the Governor General's Secretary — Program expenditures and expenditures incurred for former Governors General, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026. |
|
|
| No. 5 — June 16, 2025 — The President of the Treasury Board — That Vote 1, in the amount of $3,422,808, under Leaders' Debates Commission — Program expenditures, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, be concurred in. |
| June 16, 2025 — Christine Normandin (Saint-Jean) — Notice of opposition to Vote 1, in the amount of $3,422,808, under Leaders' Debates Commission — Program expenditures, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026. |
| UNOPPOSED VOTES |
| June 10, 2025 — The President of the Treasury Board — That the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, except any vote disposed of earlier today, be concurred in. |
| Supplementary Estimates (A) |
| UNOPPOSED VOTES |
| June 10, 2025 — The President of the Treasury Board — That the Supplementary Estimates (A) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, be concurred in. |
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|