House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 30 Friday, September 26, 2025 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
| September 25, 2025 — Kerry Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Wednesday, September 24, 2025, be concurred in. |
|
|
| September 25, 2025 — Kerry Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach) — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Wednesday, September 24, 2025, be concurred in. |
|
|
| September 25, 2025 — Kerry Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach) — That the third report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Wednesday, September 24, 2025, be concurred in. |
|
|
| September 25, 2025 — The Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill) — That the first report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, be concurred in. |
|
|
| September 25, 2025 — John Williamson (Saint John—St. Croix) — That the first report of the Liaison Committee, presented on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, be concurred in. |
Questions |
|
| Q-3722 — September 25, 2025 — Arnold Viersen (Peace River—Westlock) — With regard to the Temporary Foreign Workers Program, Labour Market Impact Assessments, human trafficking, and forced labour, since 2020, broken down by year, National Occupational Classification and province: (a) how many Labour Market Impact Assessments applications were (i) submitted, (ii) approved, (iii) rejected, (iv) withdrawn; (b) how many Labour Market Impact Assessments applications were refused or revoked on public policy grounds under sections 30(1.2) or 30(1.4) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and what is the breakdown; (c) for open work permit applications submitted by temporary foreign workers holding Labour Market Impact Assessment-based employer-specific permits who have been identified as being abused or at risk of abuse in relation to their employment in Canada, how many applications were (i) received, (ii) approved, (iii) rejected, (iv) withdrawn; (d) of the Labour Market Impact Assessment-based employer-specific work permits that later transitioned to an open work permit for vulnerable workers, what is the percentage of those broken down by sectors flagged as high-risk; and (e) with regard to policies to protect vulnerable populations from forced labour and exploitation, has the government consulted with law enforcement and stakeholders regarding at-risk or vulnerable occupations or undertaken an assessment in the past five years and, if not, why not? |
| Q-3732 — September 25, 2025 — Arnold Viersen (Peace River—Westlock) — With regard to the government’s relationship to Aylo, formerly known as MindGeek, and the company’s owner Ethical Capital Partners, since November 4, 2015: (a) has the Canadian government given assistance to Aylo, MindGeek, or Ethical Capital Partners in relation to national or international cases, through (i) legal aid and advice, (ii) consular aid and if so, when was it and what type of advice was provided; (b) has the Canadian government ever given funds (i) as a direct transfer, (ii) as a grant (iii) in the form of tax cuts to Aylo, MindGeek, or any subsidiaries, and if so, what are the details, including when and how much; (c) has Aylo or MindGeek ever requested consular or economic aid from the Canadian government, including from any department, agency, or other government entity, and, if so, what are the details including the dates and summaries of the requests; (d) has the government received any advice or direction from anyone outside of the government, related to Aylo, MindGeek, or any subsidiaries, and, if so, what are the details, including the dates and summaries of the advice or direction; (e) what are the details of any emails, texts, briefing notes, memos or correspondence related to (a), (b), (c) and (d), including the (i) title, (ii) date, (iii) sender, (iv) recipient, (v) subject matter, (vi) file number; (f) what documents have been prepared by the government departments or agencies about Aylo, MindGeek or Ethical Capital Partners, including the (i) date, (ii) title or subject matter, (iii) type of document (routine correspondence, directive, options to consider, etc.), (iv) department’s internal tracking number, (v) sender and recipient, if applicable, (vi) summary of contents; and (g) how many reports has the Royal Canadian Mounted Police received concerning Aylo, MindGeek or any subsidiaries, including a breakdown by (i) report type, (ii) date, (iii) outcome of the report? |
| Q-3742 — September 25, 2025 — Matt Strauss (Kitchener South—Hespeler) — With regard to the Canada Revenue Agency office at 166 Frederick Street in Kitchener, Ontario: (a) does the government own the building in which the Canada Revenue Agency office is located; (b) if the answer to (a) is negative, (i) who owns the building, (ii) what is the current monthly rental or leasing rate, (iii) since March 2020, how much has the government paid to rent or lease the office space; (c) if the answer to (a) is positive, for that property, since March 2020, and broken down by year, how much has the government transferred the (i) City of Kitchener, (ii) Regional Municipality of Waterloo, through the Payments in Lieu of Taxes program; and (d) for that property, since March 2020, and broken down by year, how much has the government paid for (i) cleaning (ii) heating, (iii) electricity, (iv) water and sewage, (v) security, (vi) other expenses required for operating the building, broken down by type? |
| Q-3752 — September 25, 2025 — Matt Strauss (Kitchener South—Hespeler) — With regard to the Canada Revenue Agency offices: (a) how many offices does the Canada Revenue Agency maintain in Canada, broken down by census metropolitan area; (b) what are the locations of each office; (c) how many Canada Revenue Agency staff work at each office in (b); (d) for each office in (b), (i) are Canada Revenue Agency staff currently allowed access to the office to work, (ii) is public allowed access to the office; (e) for each office that is not open to either Canada Revenue Agency staff, the public or both, is there an expected timeline for reopening that building, and, if so, what is the timeline for (i) Canada Revenue Agency staff, (ii) the public; (f) for each office that is closed to either Canada Revenue Agency staff, the public, or both, (i) who made the decision to keep the office closed, (ii) when was that decision made; and (g) have any briefing notes been prepared for the Minister of National Revenue or their staff regarding the potential re-opening of closed Canada Revenue Agency offices, and, if so, what are the details of those briefing notes, broken down by (i) date prepared, (ii) author, (iii) recipients, (iv) internal department tracking number, (v) title? |
| Q-3762 — September 25, 2025 — Andrew Lawton (Elgin—St. Thomas—London South) — With regard to the Temporary Foreign Worker Program: (a) how many calls has the Temporary Foreign Worker tip line received, broken down by month and year, since 2019; (b) of the calls in (a), what is the breakdown by the type of situation or incident reported (abuse, employer withholding passport, etc.), and whether or not it was investigated; (c) what is the breakdown of (a) and (b) by type of action taken as a result of the tip, including what, if any, punitive action was taken, including how many resulted in (i) a referral to police, (ii) charges laid, (iii) other punitive action, broken down by type; (d) how many reports made through the online portal has the Temporary Foreign Worker tip website received, broken down by month and year, since 2019; (e) of the tips in (d), what is the breakdown by type of situation or incident reported; (f) what is the breakdown of (d) and (e) by type of action taken as a result of the tip, including what, if any, punitive action was taken, including how many resulted in (i) a referral to police, (ii) charges laid, (iii) other punitive action, broken down by type; and (g) of the allegations made through the tips, how many were treated as credible or founded and how many were treated as frivolous or unfounded, broken down by (i) phone, (ii) online, tips? |
| Q-3772 — September 25, 2025 — Scott Anderson (Vernon—Lake Country—Monashee) — With regard to the cases of suspected invoicing fraud by information technology subcontractors that have been submitted for investigation to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and other law enforcement agencies, as referenced in the government response to Order Paper Question Q-105: (a) what are the details of all contracts and payments made to the companies and subcontractors involved in these cases since January 1, 2016, including, for each (i) the name of the company or subcontractor, (ii) the total amount paid by the government, (iii) the specific government department or agency that made the payments, (iv) a summary description of the goods or services provided, (v) the file number associated with the contract or payment; (b) what is the total value of the funds involved in the suspected fraud for each of the six cases submitted to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police; and (c) what is the total value of the funds involved in the nine cases submitted to Public Services and Procurement Canada? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
| M-18 — September 25, 2025 — The Honourable Judy A. Sgro (Humber River—Black Creek) — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should introduce a Human Rights in North Korea Act that would: |
| (a) create the position of Special Envoy on Human Rights in North Korea, whose mandate would include: |
| (i) monitoring and reporting on the human rights situation in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea), including the situation of political prison camps called Kwan-li-so, |
| (ii) monitoring and reporting on the situation of North Korean defectors, |
| (iii) supporting international efforts to protect the people of North Korea from crimes against humanity and to promote human rights and political freedoms in North Korea, including through dialogue with international organizations and foreign governments, |
| (iv) recommending ways for Canada to help protect the people of North Korea from crimes against humanity and to promote human rights and political freedoms in North Korea, |
| (v) recommending ways for Canada to assist North Korean defectors in China and elsewhere; |
| (b) provide for funding and support for non-governmental organizations that promote freedom, human rights, democracy and the rule of law in North Korea; |
| (c) provide for funding and support for non-governmental organizations that provide humanitarian assistance to North Korean defectors in China and elsewhere; |
| (d) require the Minister of Foreign Affairs to table regular reports in Parliament on: |
| (i) the situation of human rights in North Korea, including the situation of political prison camps Kwan-li-so, |
| (ii) the situation of North Korean defectors in China and elsewhere, including their ability to access services provided by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and by diplomatic missions, |
| (iii) Canadian policy regarding North Korean defectors, including North Korean refugee claimants, both within and outside Canada; and |
| (e) facilitate applications by North Korean defectors for refugee status in Canada. |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|